OpenJournalRank

About OpenJournalRank

A journal ranking you can check.

OpenJournalRank is a free journal ranking. It measures field-normalized citation impact from open OpenAlex data, and it publishes the method and the results so anyone can check every score. Its code will be published under the MIT License.

  • Free, no accountEvery journal page, ranking and comparison is open to read. There is no login and no paywall.
  • Open dataThe published data is CC BY 4.0, built from OpenAlex, which is CC0. The code will be published under the MIT License.
  • Reproducible releasesReleases are annual and computed from a frozen snapshot. Each one is sealed with a SHA-256 manifest.
Release
2025.2
Journals
33,339 CWTS Core
Snapshot
OpenAlex, September 23, 2026
Method
nci3-v1, with changes: Meeting abstracts excluded from citable papers

The problem

Journal metrics are hard to check

Researchers, librarians and funders rely on journal metrics, and some good free ones exist. Very few of them let an outsider see the inputs, rerun the calculation and reuse the result.

  1. The most-cited metrics sit behind a subscription

    The Journal Impact Factor is published in Journal Citation Reports, which needs an institutional subscription. Clarivate prohibits wholesale sharing of JCR data outside the subscribing institution[1]. The formula is published, but which items count as “citable” in the denominator is decided by Clarivate journal by journal[2].

    Google Scholar Metrics is free, but its counts are produced automatically from an index you cannot export[28].

  2. Free metrics rest on data you can’t redistribute

    CiteScore, SJR and SNIP are free to view. All three are computed from Scopus, and Scopus terms forbid systematic reproduction or redistribution[13]. SCImago allows only non-commercial use with a citation[19]. Recomputing these numbers means licensing the same database.

    Some sites are open: OOIR offers its rankings under CC0[44] and Exaly is CC BY-SA[47]. Neither normalizes its headline metric by field.

  3. Little context, and hard comparisons

    Most rankings show one number. Price is rarely shown: SJR shows an estimated APC, not the listed price[18]. JCR leaves out citations to and from retracted papers, but only subscribers see it[6]. We found no free ranking site that shows retractions.

    Raw citation averages vary widely between fields[21]. Without normalization, a side-by-side comparison of journals from different fields can mislead.

“We are monitoring and incentivizing open science using closed data.”

Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information, preamble[56]. DORA likewise asks metric providers to publish the data and methods behind every metric[54], and the Leiden Manifesto asks that those evaluated be able to verify the data and analysis[55].

How we compare

OpenJournalRank next to ten other sources

Each tool has strengths. JCR is curated, Scopus has wide coverage, SJR is free and rich in context, and SNIP’s field normalization is rigorous. This comparison asks a narrower question: can you get the numbers, reuse them and rebuild them? Cells cite the sources listed at the bottom of the page.

Checked: These tools change, so an entry may be out of date. Each one cites what we read on that date.

  • Yes
  • Partly
  • No
  • Unclear
Icons mark how fully a tool meets each point; coverage and updates are described without a rating. Small raised numbers link to the sources below.
ToolCost and accessData licenceRecomputable by othersMethod documentedField-normalizedCoverageUpdatesContext shownCompare tool
This site
OpenJournalRankOJR · OpenAlex data
Yes: Free, no account[57]
Yes: Data CC BY 4.0, inputs CC0; code to be published under MIT[57]
Partly: Open inputs and SHA-256-sealed releases; code to be published (MIT)[57]
Yes: Full method and calculation rules (nci3-v1)[57]
Yes: Yes: subfield, year and document type[57]
Partly: 33,339 CWTS Core journals; non-core not ranked yet[41]
Partly: Annual, frozen releases[57]
Values never change within a release. That makes them reproducible but slower to reflect new citations than a live index. Release 2025.2 uses the OpenAlex snapshot of September 23, 2026.
Yes: OA share, listed APC, self-citation, retractions, collaboration, growth, document mix[57]
Yes: Side by side, any journals[57]
Subscription databases
Journal Citation ReportsClarivate · JIF, JCI
No: Institutional subscription[1]
No: No sharing outside the subscribing institution; publication needs permission[1]
No: Needs Web of Science data[2]
Even with access, the JIF denominator depends on Clarivate’s judgement of which items are “citable”. Document types are assigned at the section level, and each journal is reviewed individually.
Partly: Formula published; citable-item rules editorial[2]
Partly: JIF: no. JCI: yes, by category, year and type[4]
22,643 journals (JCR 2026), curated from Web of Science Core Collection[3, 8]
Annual, June[3]
Partly: JIF without self-cites, OA counts, retracted citations excluded; APC not found[5, 7, 6]
Yes: Yes, for subscribers[5]
DimensionsDigital Science
Partly: Free for personal, non-commercial use; Analytics is paid[30]
No: Personal use only; no redistribution or text mining[31]
Partly: Free data access for approved research projects[32]
Through its SRAD programme, Digital Science gives university researchers free access to the API and BigQuery data for non-commercial scientometric work, by application. The data still cannot be redistributed.
Partly: FCR and RCR defined; field codes assigned by machine[33]
Partly: At article level (FCR, RCR); no journal metric of its own[33]
Broad, uncurated publication index; journal count unclear[30]
Unclear: Continuous; frequency not officially stated[30]
Partly: OA filters, Altmetric, links to grants and patents[30]
Partly: Paid Analytics can rank source titles within a search[34]
Free to view, built on Scopus
Scopus SourcesElsevier · CiteScore
Yes: Free to view; list download needs a login[9, 12]
No: No systematic reproduction or redistribution; display allowed with a link back[13, 14]
Partly: Per-title data free for checking; full recompute needs Scopus[10]
Yes: Formula published: 4-year window, five document types[11]
No: No; percentile within subject category[11]
CiteScore itself is a raw citations-per-document ratio. Scopus Sources adds a percentile and rank within each subject category, which helps within a field but not across fields.
32,089 active titles, selected by an advisory board[9, 15]
Annual, plus a monthly CiteScore Tracker[9]
Partly: OA filter, % cited, discontinued titles flagged; no APC or retraction fields[16]
Unclear: “Compare sources”, up to 10 titles, per library guides[17]
SCImago Journal & Country RankSCImago · SJR
Yes: Free, no account; CSV download[18]
Partly: Non-commercial use with citation; not an open licence[19]
No: Needs the full Scopus citation network[20]
Yes: Documented prestige algorithm[20]
Partly: Partly, through prestige weighting; quartiles per category[21]
30,412 journals (2025 edition), as selected by Scopus[22, 18]
Annual[18, 22]
SCImago’s FAQ says SJR is updated every June. A university library reports that the 2025 edition came out on 15 April 2026.
Partly: Self-cites, international collaboration, OA flag, estimated APC; no retractions[18]
SJR shows an estimated APC, which SCImago says does not reflect the actual APC. Retractions are not shown. SCImago offers integrity indicators as a separate product.
Yes: Compare journals page[23]
CWTS Journal IndicatorsCWTS Leiden · SNIP
Yes: Free; full Excel download[26]
Unclear: No licence stated; underlying data from Scopus[24]
No: Needs Scopus citation data[24]
Yes: Documented, with 95% stability intervals[25, 27]
Yes: Yes, normalized on the citing side[27]
Over 20,000 Scopus journals[24]
Annual (latest June 2026)[24]
Partly: % self-citations; no OA, APC or retractions[25]
Unclear: Filter by field; no dedicated compare view confirmed[24]
ResurchifyScopus and SJR values
Yes: Free to browse[51]
Unclear: Reuse terms unclear; values derived from Scopus[51]
No: Needs Scopus data[51]
Partly: Impact formula described; overall rank unclear[51]
No: No[51]
Scopus sources, including conferences[51]
About yearly (pages dated June 2025)[51]
No: Call-for-papers listings; no OA, APC or retractions[51]
Unclear: Unclear[51]
Free to view, other data
Google Scholar MetricsGoogle · h5-index
Yes: Free, no account[28]
No: No data licence, API or bulk download found[28]
No: Counts made automatically from a non-exportable index[28]
Partly: h5 defined; inclusion and citing corpus not disclosed[28]
No: No[28]
Venues with 100+ articles in 5 years; top 20 per category, top 100 per language[28]
Coverage is very broad and multilingual, a real strength. Category lists are browsable in English only.
Annual, usually July; 2025 edition is the latest we found[29]
No: None[28]
No: Ranked lists only[28]
OOIRCrossref citations · TQCC
Yes: Free[43]
Yes: Rankings reusable under CC0[44]
Partly: Open inputs (Crossref); code not found[43]
Partly: Metrics defined on the site[44]
No: No; ranked within fields[44]
All disciplines since 2023; journal count unclear[45]
Regular (last updated 1 Oct 2026)[44]
Unclear: Unclear[44]
Unclear: Unclear[44]
ExalyMixed sources, incl. Crossref
Yes: Free, no registration[46]
Yes: CC BY-SA 4.0 (share-alike)[47]
Partly: Per-journal CSV and JSON; code not public[49, 48]
Partly: Formulas shown per journal; data sources described inconsistently[49, 48]
No: No; percentile within discipline[49]
Broad (over 100 million documents); journal count unclear[46]
“Regularly”; no schedule[50]
Partly: Impact without self-citations; no OA, APC or retractions[49]
Yes: Compare two journals[46]
Open data, no ranking
OpenAlexOpen catalogue · raw data
Yes: Free; free API key, heavy use paid[37]
Yes: CC0[35]
Yes: Free quarterly snapshots[36]
The live API changes daily. Exact recomputation needs a dated snapshot, which is why each OpenJournalRank release names its snapshot.
Not a ranking; per-source summary statistics[38]
No: No (2-year mean citedness, h-index)[38]
268,799 sources of all types, not selective[40]
Continuous; free snapshot quarterly[36]
Partly: Raw fields: OA, DOAJ, listed APC, retraction flag[38, 39]
No: No[35]

The tool column stays in place while you scroll sideways.

OpenJournalRank

OJR · OpenAlex data · This site

Cost and access
Yes: Free, no account[57]
Data licence
Yes: Data CC BY 4.0, inputs CC0; code to be published under MIT[57]
Recomputable by others
Partly: Open inputs and SHA-256-sealed releases; code to be published (MIT)[57]
Method documented
Yes: Full method and calculation rules (nci3-v1)[57]
Field-normalized
Yes: Yes: subfield, year and document type[57]
Coverage
Partly: 33,339 CWTS Core journals; non-core not ranked yet[41]
Updates
Partly: Annual, frozen releases[57]
Values never change within a release. That makes them reproducible but slower to reflect new citations than a live index. Release 2025.2 uses the OpenAlex snapshot of September 23, 2026.
Context shown
Yes: OA share, listed APC, self-citation, retractions, collaboration, growth, document mix[57]
Compare tool
Yes: Side by side, any journals[57]

Journal Citation Reports

Clarivate · JIF, JCI · Subscription databases

Cost and access
No: Institutional subscription[1]
Data licence
No: No sharing outside the subscribing institution; publication needs permission[1]
Recomputable by others
No: Needs Web of Science data[2]
Even with access, the JIF denominator depends on Clarivate’s judgement of which items are “citable”. Document types are assigned at the section level, and each journal is reviewed individually.
Method documented
Partly: Formula published; citable-item rules editorial[2]
Field-normalized
Partly: JIF: no. JCI: yes, by category, year and type[4]
Coverage
22,643 journals (JCR 2026), curated from Web of Science Core Collection[3, 8]
Updates
Annual, June[3]
Context shown
Partly: JIF without self-cites, OA counts, retracted citations excluded; APC not found[5, 7, 6]
Compare tool
Yes: Yes, for subscribers[5]

Dimensions

Digital Science · Subscription databases

Cost and access
Partly: Free for personal, non-commercial use; Analytics is paid[30]
Data licence
No: Personal use only; no redistribution or text mining[31]
Recomputable by others
Partly: Free data access for approved research projects[32]
Through its SRAD programme, Digital Science gives university researchers free access to the API and BigQuery data for non-commercial scientometric work, by application. The data still cannot be redistributed.
Method documented
Partly: FCR and RCR defined; field codes assigned by machine[33]
Field-normalized
Partly: At article level (FCR, RCR); no journal metric of its own[33]
Coverage
Broad, uncurated publication index; journal count unclear[30]
Updates
Unclear: Continuous; frequency not officially stated[30]
Context shown
Partly: OA filters, Altmetric, links to grants and patents[30]
Compare tool
Partly: Paid Analytics can rank source titles within a search[34]

Scopus Sources

Elsevier · CiteScore · Free to view, built on Scopus

Cost and access
Yes: Free to view; list download needs a login[9, 12]
Data licence
No: No systematic reproduction or redistribution; display allowed with a link back[13, 14]
Recomputable by others
Partly: Per-title data free for checking; full recompute needs Scopus[10]
Method documented
Yes: Formula published: 4-year window, five document types[11]
Field-normalized
No: No; percentile within subject category[11]
CiteScore itself is a raw citations-per-document ratio. Scopus Sources adds a percentile and rank within each subject category, which helps within a field but not across fields.
Coverage
32,089 active titles, selected by an advisory board[9, 15]
Updates
Annual, plus a monthly CiteScore Tracker[9]
Context shown
Partly: OA filter, % cited, discontinued titles flagged; no APC or retraction fields[16]
Compare tool
Unclear: “Compare sources”, up to 10 titles, per library guides[17]

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

SCImago · SJR · Free to view, built on Scopus

Cost and access
Yes: Free, no account; CSV download[18]
Data licence
Partly: Non-commercial use with citation; not an open licence[19]
Recomputable by others
No: Needs the full Scopus citation network[20]
Method documented
Yes: Documented prestige algorithm[20]
Field-normalized
Partly: Partly, through prestige weighting; quartiles per category[21]
Coverage
30,412 journals (2025 edition), as selected by Scopus[22, 18]
Updates
Annual[18, 22]
SCImago’s FAQ says SJR is updated every June. A university library reports that the 2025 edition came out on 15 April 2026.
Context shown
Partly: Self-cites, international collaboration, OA flag, estimated APC; no retractions[18]
SJR shows an estimated APC, which SCImago says does not reflect the actual APC. Retractions are not shown. SCImago offers integrity indicators as a separate product.
Compare tool
Yes: Compare journals page[23]

CWTS Journal Indicators

CWTS Leiden · SNIP · Free to view, built on Scopus

Cost and access
Yes: Free; full Excel download[26]
Data licence
Unclear: No licence stated; underlying data from Scopus[24]
Recomputable by others
No: Needs Scopus citation data[24]
Method documented
Yes: Documented, with 95% stability intervals[25, 27]
Field-normalized
Yes: Yes, normalized on the citing side[27]
Coverage
Over 20,000 Scopus journals[24]
Updates
Annual (latest June 2026)[24]
Context shown
Partly: % self-citations; no OA, APC or retractions[25]
Compare tool
Unclear: Filter by field; no dedicated compare view confirmed[24]

Resurchify

Scopus and SJR values · Free to view, built on Scopus

Cost and access
Yes: Free to browse[51]
Data licence
Unclear: Reuse terms unclear; values derived from Scopus[51]
Recomputable by others
No: Needs Scopus data[51]
Method documented
Partly: Impact formula described; overall rank unclear[51]
Field-normalized
No: No[51]
Coverage
Scopus sources, including conferences[51]
Updates
About yearly (pages dated June 2025)[51]
Context shown
No: Call-for-papers listings; no OA, APC or retractions[51]
Compare tool
Unclear: Unclear[51]

Google Scholar Metrics

Google · h5-index · Free to view, other data

Cost and access
Yes: Free, no account[28]
Data licence
No: No data licence, API or bulk download found[28]
Recomputable by others
No: Counts made automatically from a non-exportable index[28]
Method documented
Partly: h5 defined; inclusion and citing corpus not disclosed[28]
Field-normalized
No: No[28]
Coverage
Venues with 100+ articles in 5 years; top 20 per category, top 100 per language[28]
Coverage is very broad and multilingual, a real strength. Category lists are browsable in English only.
Updates
Annual, usually July; 2025 edition is the latest we found[29]
Context shown
No: None[28]
Compare tool
No: Ranked lists only[28]

OOIR

Crossref citations · TQCC · Free to view, other data

Cost and access
Yes: Free[43]
Data licence
Yes: Rankings reusable under CC0[44]
Recomputable by others
Partly: Open inputs (Crossref); code not found[43]
Method documented
Partly: Metrics defined on the site[44]
Field-normalized
No: No; ranked within fields[44]
Coverage
All disciplines since 2023; journal count unclear[45]
Updates
Regular (last updated 1 Oct 2026)[44]
Context shown
Unclear: Unclear[44]
Compare tool
Unclear: Unclear[44]

Exaly

Mixed sources, incl. Crossref · Free to view, other data

Cost and access
Yes: Free, no registration[46]
Data licence
Yes: CC BY-SA 4.0 (share-alike)[47]
Recomputable by others
Partly: Per-journal CSV and JSON; code not public[49, 48]
Method documented
Partly: Formulas shown per journal; data sources described inconsistently[49, 48]
Field-normalized
No: No; percentile within discipline[49]
Coverage
Broad (over 100 million documents); journal count unclear[46]
Updates
“Regularly”; no schedule[50]
Context shown
Partly: Impact without self-citations; no OA, APC or retractions[49]
Compare tool
Yes: Compare two journals[46]

OpenAlex

Open catalogue · raw data · Open data, no ranking

Cost and access
Yes: Free; free API key, heavy use paid[37]
Data licence
Yes: CC0[35]
Recomputable by others
Yes: Free quarterly snapshots[36]
The live API changes daily. Exact recomputation needs a dated snapshot, which is why each OpenJournalRank release names its snapshot.
Method documented
Not a ranking; per-source summary statistics[38]
Field-normalized
No: No (2-year mean citedness, h-index)[38]
Coverage
268,799 sources of all types, not selective[40]
Updates
Continuous; free snapshot quarterly[36]
Context shown
Partly: Raw fields: OA, DOAJ, listed APC, retraction flag[38, 39]
Compare tool
No: No[35]

What we do differently

Built so you don’t have to take our word for it

  • Open data

    The rankings are original analysis of open data from OpenAlex. The data files behind every page are public, and you can reuse them with attribution. The pipeline that turns OpenAlex records into rankings will be published under the MIT License.

    Licences
    Source codeMIT (to be published)
    Data and page textCC BY 4.0
    OpenAlex inputsCC0
  • Sealed, reproducible releases

    Each release is computed once from a frozen OpenAlex snapshot. Its sealed manifest records every file’s path, size and SHA-256 hash, plus the build commit. A deploy is refused if any file differs from the manifest.

    Release 2025.2 manifest records
    release   2025.2
    snapshot  OpenAlex, 2026-09-23
    method    nci3-v1
    commit    the Git commit the release was built from
    files[]   path · size · sha256
  • Field-normalized

    The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

    The OJR (OpenJournalRank Indicator) compares a journal’s citations with the world average for papers of the same subfield, publication year and type. A score of 1.0 means its papers were cited as often as that average. Ranks come with likely ranges, and trajectories show which journals are rising or falling.

    The NCI3 method, in one line
    OJR = actual ÷ expected citations
    3-year window · journal self-citations excluded
  • Context next to the score

    A score alone can hide a lot. Each journal page sets the score beside measures of cost, integrity and publishing mix, and compares each one with its field.

    • OA share
    • Listed APC (USD)
    • Self-citation
    • Retractions
    • International collaboration
    • Output growth
    • Document mix
    • Impact factor (2-year)
  • Compare side by side

    Add journals from any page and compare their scores, ranks, trajectories and context measures in one view, all on the same definitions.

    Try itOpen a journal and choose Add to compare. Go to Journals
  • Free, with no account

    There is no sign-up, no subscription tier and no hidden premium score. Every page shows how its numbers were calculated and links to the method.

    How pages are madeEvery ranking figure is computed by our code from a frozen OpenAlex snapshot; provider values are labelled as OpenAlex values. Page text uses fixed templates filled with computed numbers. No page text is written by AI. This process makes scores reproducible and applies the same definitions to every journal.

What we don’t do (yet)

Known limitations

Open data has gaps too. These are the ones that most affect our numbers.

  • Incomplete reference lists

    A citation is counted only if OpenAlex captured the citing paper’s reference list[58]. In this release, 84.3% of 2025 articles and reviews had at least one matched reference (87.1% for 2024). Every score shows its citing year’s coverage.

  • Document types

    OpenAlex assigns document types automatically. A study of an earlier snapshot found it classed almost no journal items as reviews, where Scopus and Web of Science classed about 9–10%[52]. OpenAlex has since added a review type, but a 2025 study still found far more type errors in OpenAlex than in Web of Science[53]. Because reviews are cited more, we show each journal’s review share and an articles-only OJR next to the main score.

  • New and untested

    Methods are versioned (nci3-v1), and any change will appear in a new release rather than altering an old one.

  • Core journals only, for now

    This release covers 33,339 CWTS Core journals[41]. Journals outside that list, including many regional and non-English journals, are not ranked yet. They will be added later as a separate population. The world-average baseline includes every journal in OpenAlex, including journals outside the ranked set.

  • Annual, not live

    Values are frozen for a year so that they can be reproduced. Scopus’s monthly CiteScore Tracker will reflect new citations sooner[9].

  • Not a quality verdict

    The OJR measures citation impact under a published method. It does not judge research quality or endorse a journal. These are this site’s quartiles, not SCImago, Scopus or Journal Impact Factor (JIF) quartiles. Citations from repository-hosted works, such as preprints and data archives, are excluded by policy.

For what published studies say about these gaps and about each of our design choices, read What the research says about OJR.

Who we are

Who we are and how to cite us

OpenJournalRank

An independent research group.

Contact: contact@openjournalrank.com

The code will be published under the OpenJournalRank organization; contact us for access meanwhile.

How to cite

Name the release, because values are recomputed for every year in each release. Say if you changed the data.

OpenJournalRank, release 2025.2, computed from the OpenAlex snapshot of September 23, 2026. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. https://openjournalrank.com
Please also credit OpenAlex as the data source[42].

Sources

Sources

Checked on October 19, 2026. Some vendor pages block automated reading. In those cases we used the vendor’s press release or a library guide, and marked anything we could not confirm as “unclear”. Corrections are welcome at contact@openjournalrank.com.

  1. Clarivate. A quick refresher on Journal Citation Reports: use cases, branding and terms of use.
  2. Clarivate. Journal Citation Reports reference guide (2024).
  3. Clarivate. Clarivate releases Journal Citation Reports 2026, 17 June 2026.
  4. Clarivate. Introducing the Journal Citation Indicator.
  5. Clarivate. The many flavors of the Journal Impact Factor.
  6. Research Information. Clarivate removes citations to and from retracted articles from JIF, May 2025.
  7. Research Information. Journal Citation Reports to feature open access data.
  8. NISO. Clarivate announces changes to the 2023 Journal Citation Reports.
  9. Elsevier. Introducing CiteScore 2025.
  10. Elsevier. CiteScore metrics.
  11. Elsevier Support. What is CiteScore?
  12. Elsevier Support. How do I use the Scopus Sources feature?
  13. Elsevier. Scopus terms and conditions.
  14. Elsevier Developers. Journal metrics display guidelines.
  15. Elsevier. Scopus Content Selection and Advisory Board.
  16. Elsevier. Scopus content policy and selection.
  17. Imperial College London Library. Scopus: compare journals.
  18. SCImago. SCImago Journal & Country Rank: help and FAQ.
  19. SCImago. SCImago Journal & Country Rank: about us.
  20. González-Pereira, Guerrero-Bote & Moya-Anegón. The SJR indicator: a new indicator of journals’ scientific prestige. arXiv:0912.4141.
  21. Elsevier Support. What is SCImago Journal Rank?
  22. Universitat Politècnica de València Library. SJR 2025 edition released.
  23. SCImago. Compare journals.
  24. CWTS. CWTS Journal Indicators.
  25. CWTS. CWTS Journal Indicators: methodology.
  26. CWTS. CWTS Journal Indicators: downloads.
  27. Waltman, van Eck, van Leeuwen & Visser. Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator. arXiv:1209.0785.
  28. Google Scholar. Google Scholar Metrics.
  29. Google Scholar Blog. 2025 Scholar Metrics released, July 2025.
  30. Digital Science. Dimensions products.
  31. Digital Science. Dimensions website terms.
  32. Digital Science. Scientometric Research Access to Data (SRAD).
  33. UNC Libraries. Dimensions: metrics.
  34. PolyU Library. Dimensions Analytics guide.
  35. OpenAlex. About OpenAlex.
  36. OpenAlex. OpenAlex snapshot.
  37. OpenAlex. API authentication and pricing.
  38. OpenAlex. Source object.
  39. OpenAlex. Work object.
  40. OpenAlex API. Sources count, queried 19 October 2026.
  41. OpenAlex. CWTS Core sources (is_core).
  42. Priem, Piwowar & Orr. OpenAlex: a fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts. arXiv:2205.01833, 2022.
  43. OOIR. About OOIR.
  44. OOIR. Journal rankings.
  45. Kenyatta University Library. The Observatory of International Research.
  46. Exaly. Home.
  47. Exaly. Licence.
  48. Exaly. Technology.
  49. Exaly. Example journal impact page.
  50. Exaly. FAQ.
  51. Resurchify. Example journal impact page.
  52. Haupka, Culbert, Schniedermann, Jahn & Mayr. Analysis of the publication and document types in OpenAlex, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed and Semantic Scholar. arXiv:2406.15154.
  53. Mongeon et al. Investigating document type discrepancies between OpenAlex and the Web of Science. CAIS 2025.
  54. DORA. San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment, recommendations 11–12.
  55. Hicks, Wouters, Waltman, de Rijcke & Rafols. The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature 520, 429–431 (2015).
  56. Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information. Preamble, 2024.
  57. OpenJournalRank. Source code, method and data licence (MIT; CC BY 4.0). To be published under the OpenJournalRank organization; available on request meanwhile.
  58. OpenJournalRank. OpenAlex reference coverage by year, 13 October 2026.

Journal Impact Factor™ and Journal Citation Reports™ are trademarks of Clarivate. CiteScore™ is a trademark and Scopus® a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. SJR is an indicator of SCImago. Google Scholar is a trademark of Google LLC. Dimensions is a product of Digital Science. OpenJournalRank is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of them.

The OJR and our quartiles are computed independently from OpenAlex. They are not Journal Impact Factor, CiteScore, SJR or SNIP values.