OpenJournalRank

Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development

Springer Science+Business Media · Brazil

ISSN-L
2195-1721
OpenAlex ID
S2490763971
APC list price
$1,085
Full statisticsOpen accessCore list

In 2025, Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development had an OJR of 1.16: its 2022–2024 papers received 1.2 times the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 2.09. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development is Q2 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 Information Systems ranking (#58 of 195 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

OpenAlex-listed APC: US$1,085 (source snapshot September 23, 2026). Check current charges with the journal.

In context

How Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development compares with the journals of its comparison group: Computer Science. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Middle half of the field: $2,172–$3,290; median $2,895; n = 506 field journals.

0.37× field median
$1,085vs field median $2,895
$0$2K$4K

Field percentile: 10/100 among 506 eligible journals

10/100

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 30.6%–100.0%; median 72.2%; n = 1,120 field journals.

Typical for field
100.0%vs field median 72.2%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 79/100 among 1,120 eligible journals

79/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

Middle half of the field: 15.8%–32.9%; median 23.9%; n = 1,061 field journals.

Typical for field
30.2%vs field median 23.9%
0%20%40%

Field percentile: 68/100 among 1,061 eligible journals

68/100

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

Middle half of the field: -14.5%–+47.2%; median +9.2%; n = 990 field journals.

Typical for field
+19.4%vs field median +9.2%
-20%+20%+60%

Field percentile: 58/100 among 990 eligible journals

58/100

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–0.8%; median 0.0%; n = 1,120 field journals.

Typical for field
0.0%vs field median 0.0%
0.0%0.4%0.8%

Field percentile: 30/100 among 1,120 eligible journals

30/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.29–1.39; median 0.70; n = 1,101 field journals.

Typical for field
1.16vs field median 0.70
0.00.51.01.5

Field percentile: 69/100 among 1,101 eligible journals

69/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 22.1%–64.4%; median 40.6%; n = 1,120 field journals.

Typical for field
34.9%vs field median 40.6%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 43/100 among 1,120 eligible journals

43/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 45.1%–62.1%; median 51.5%; n = 1,117 field journals.

Typical for field
58.7%vs field median 51.5%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 68/100 among 1,117 eligible journals

68/100