OpenJournalRank

Veterinary Record Case Reports

Wiley · United Kingdom

ISSN-L
2052-6121
OpenAlex ID
S2764785811
APC list price
$1,480
Full statisticsSubscription or hybridCore list

In 2025, Veterinary Record Case Reports had an OJR of 0.12: its 2022–2024 papers received 12% of the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 0.29. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

Veterinary Record Case Reports is Q4 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 Small Animals ranking (#55 of 60 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

OpenAlex-listed APC: US$1,480 (source snapshot September 23, 2026). Check current charges with the journal.

In context

How Veterinary Record Case Reports compares with the journals of its comparison group: Veterinary. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

The comparison is the pooled rate across 55 field journals (all their retracted papers divided by all their papers), so there is no percentile.

Near field rate
0.55per 1,000 papers, 2015–2024

1 retracted of 1,831 papers; field rate pooled across 55 journals

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Middle half of the field: $1,950–$3,438; median $2,995; n = 40 field journals.

0.49× field median
$1,480vs field median $2,995
$0$2K$4K

Field percentile: 21/100 among 40 eligible journals

21/100

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

Middle half of the field: 3.7%–13.3%; median 7.0%; n = 45 field journals.

Typical for field
13.3%vs field median 7.0%
0%5%10%15%

Field percentile: 74/100 among 45 eligible journals

74/100

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 37.5%–100.0%; median 72.9%; n = 68 field journals.

Typical for field
54.5%vs field median 72.9%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 33/100 among 68 eligible journals

33/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

Middle half of the field: 13.8%–29.4%; median 23.3%; n = 67 field journals.

Below typical range
13.6%vs field median 23.3%
0%20%40%

Field percentile: 25/100 among 67 eligible journals

25/100

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

Middle half of the field: -24.1%–+9.6%; median -10.4%; n = 68 field journals.

Above typical range
+21.9%vs field median -10.4%
-40%0%+40%

Field percentile: 80/100 among 68 eligible journals

80/100

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–1.3%; median 0.2%; n = 68 field journals.

Typical for field
0.0%vs field median 0.2%
0.0%0.5%1.0%1.5%

Field percentile: 24/100 among 68 eligible journals

24/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.24–0.89; median 0.50; n = 68 field journals.

0.24× field median
0.12vs field median 0.50
0.00.40.8

Field percentile: 10/100 among 68 eligible journals

10/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 29.6%–64.8%; median 44.6%; n = 68 field journals.

Above typical range
77.7%vs field median 44.6%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 86/100 among 68 eligible journals

86/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 40.1%–55.5%; median 43.8%; n = 68 field journals.

Typical for field
55.3%vs field median 43.8%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 73/100 among 68 eligible journals

73/100