OpenJournalRank

Asian Journal of Physics

Publisher not recorded · India

ISSN-L
0971-3093
OpenAlex ID
S4210168473
APC list price
Not listed
Full statisticsSubscription or hybridCore list

In 2025, Asian Journal of Physics had an OJR of 0.02: its 2022–2024 papers received 2% of the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 0.06. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

Asian Journal of Physics is Q4 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics ranking (#105 of 105 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

In context

How Asian Journal of Physics compares with the journals of its comparison group: Physics and Astronomy. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Not listed
Not listedfield median $3,000

OpenAlex has no listed APC for this journal, so there is no cost comparison.

Check the publisher’s author guidelines for current charges.

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 37.5%–100.0%; median 73.4%; n = 358 field journals.

Typical for field
61.8%vs field median 73.4%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 43/100 among 358 eligible journals

43/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

Middle half of the field: 20.6%–39.5%; median 30.1%; n = 348 field journals.

Above typical range
40.7%vs field median 30.1%
0%20%40%

Field percentile: 77/100 among 348 eligible journals

77/100

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–0.0%; median 0.0%; n = 358 field journals.

Typical for field
0.0%vs field median 0.0%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 44/100 among 358 eligible journals

44/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.29–1.07; median 0.61; n = 352 field journals.

0.04× field median
0.02vs field median 0.61
0.00.51.01.5

Field percentile: 3/100 among 352 eligible journals

3/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 27.0%–59.1%; median 38.3%; n = 358 field journals.

2.4× field median
92.2%vs field median 38.3%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 96/100 among 358 eligible journals

96/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 42.2%–57.8%; median 48.2%; n = 356 field journals.

2.1× field median
100.0%vs field median 48.2%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 97/100 among 356 eligible journals

97/100