OpenJournalRank

Energy Harvesting and Systems

De Gruyter · Germany

ISSN-L
2329-8766
ISSN
2329-8774
OpenAlex ID
S4210192938
APC list price
$1,187
Full statisticsSubscription or hybridCore list

In 2025, Energy Harvesting and Systems had an OJR of 0.60: its 2022–2024 papers received 60% of the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 3.98. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

Energy Harvesting and Systems is Q3 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 Electrical and Electronic Engineering ranking (#317 of 595 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

OpenAlex-listed APC: US$1,187 (source snapshot September 23, 2026). Check current charges with the journal.

In context

How Energy Harvesting and Systems compares with the journals of its comparison group: Engineering. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Middle half of the field: $1,990–$3,720; median $2,890; n = 1,349 field journals.

0.41× field median
$1,187vs field median $2,890
$0$2K$4K

Field percentile: 14/100 among 1,349 eligible journals

14/100

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

Middle half of the field: 2.1%–9.2%; median 4.9%; n = 1,952 field journals.

Below typical range
0.0%vs field median 4.9%
0%4%8%

Field percentile: 4/100 among 1,952 eligible journals

4/100

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 17.8%–100.0%; median 53.0%; n = 2,405 field journals.

Typical for field
60.6%vs field median 53.0%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 53/100 among 2,405 eligible journals

53/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

Middle half of the field: 15.9%–29.1%; median 22.2%; n = 2,312 field journals.

Typical for field
21.0%vs field median 22.2%
0%20%40%

Field percentile: 45/100 among 2,312 eligible journals

45/100

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–0.2%; median 0.0%; n = 2,405 field journals.

Above typical range
1.0%vs field median 0.0%
0.0%0.4%0.8%

Field percentile: 88/100 among 2,405 eligible journals

88/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.34–1.17; median 0.67; n = 2,362 field journals.

Typical for field
0.62vs field median 0.67
0.00.51.01.5

Field percentile: 47/100 among 2,362 eligible journals

47/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 15.9%–50.5%; median 29.79%; n = 2,405 field journals.

Typical for field
29.81%vs field median 29.79%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 50/100 among 2,405 eligible journals

50/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 38.2%–51.4%; median 43.9%; n = 2,402 field journals.

Above typical range
55.6%vs field median 43.9%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 82/100 among 2,402 eligible journals

82/100