OpenJournalRank

Advanced Theory and Simulations

Wiley · Germany

ISSN-L
2513-0390
OpenAlex ID
S4210193742
APC list price
$4,430
Full statisticsSubscription or hybridCore list

In 2025, Advanced Theory and Simulations had an OJR of 0.66: its 2022–2024 papers received 66% of the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 3.11. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

Advanced Theory and Simulations is Q3 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 Materials Chemistry ranking (#188 of 363 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

OpenAlex-listed APC: US$4,430 (source snapshot September 23, 2026). Check current charges with the journal.

In context

How Advanced Theory and Simulations compares with the journals of its comparison group: Materials Science. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

The comparison is the pooled rate across 384 field journals (all their retracted papers divided by all their papers), so there is no percentile.

None retracted
0.00per 1,000 papers, 2015–2024

0 retracted of 1,471 papers; field rate pooled across 384 journals

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Middle half of the field: $2,198–$3,990; median $3,328; n = 348 field journals.

Above typical range
$4,430vs field median $3,328
$0$2K$4K$6K

Field percentile: 90/100 among 348 eligible journals

90/100

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

Middle half of the field: 1.8%–7.3%; median 3.9%; n = 455 field journals.

Typical for field
3.4%vs field median 3.9%
0%4%8%

Field percentile: 45/100 among 455 eligible journals

45/100

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 14.7%–100.0%; median 43.0%; n = 504 field journals.

Typical for field
48.4%vs field median 43.0%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 53/100 among 504 eligible journals

53/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

Middle half of the field: 18.2%–30.4%; median 24.1%; n = 495 field journals.

Typical for field
27.9%vs field median 24.1%
0%20%40%

Field percentile: 67/100 among 495 eligible journals

67/100

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

Middle half of the field: -18.2%–+36.1%; median +2.0%; n = 446 field journals.

Typical for field
+31.6%vs field median +2.0%
-40%0%+40%

Field percentile: 72/100 among 446 eligible journals

72/100

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–0.1%; median 0.0%; n = 504 field journals.

Typical for field
0.0%vs field median 0.0%
0.00%0.05%0.10%0.15%

Field percentile: 34/100 among 504 eligible journals

34/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.38–1.07; median 0.64; n = 498 field journals.

Typical for field
0.66vs field median 0.64
0.00.51.01.5

Field percentile: 51/100 among 498 eligible journals

51/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 12.1%–39.2%; median 22.3%; n = 504 field journals.

Typical for field
29.0%vs field median 22.3%
0%20%40%

Field percentile: 62/100 among 504 eligible journals

62/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 37.2%–48.5%; median 43.1%; n = 503 field journals.

Typical for field
45.8%vs field median 43.1%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 63/100 among 503 eligible journals

63/100