OpenJournalRank

Disaster Prevention and Resilience

Publisher not recorded

ISSN-L
2832-4056
OpenAlex ID
S4387278491
APC list price
Not listed
Full statisticsSubscription or hybridCore list

In 2025, Disaster Prevention and Resilience had an OJR of 0.62: its 2022–2024 papers received 62% of the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 1.79. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

Disaster Prevention and Resilience is Q3 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 Civil and Structural Engineering ranking (#139 of 268 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

In context

How Disaster Prevention and Resilience compares with the journals of its comparison group: Engineering. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Not listed
Not listedfield median $2,890

OpenAlex has no listed APC for this journal, so there is no cost comparison.

Check the publisher’s author guidelines for current charges.

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 17.8%–100.0%; median 53.0%; n = 2,405 field journals.

Typical for field
80.0%vs field median 53.0%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 56/100 among 2,405 eligible journals

56/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–0.2%; median 0.0%; n = 2,405 field journals.

Typical for field
0.0%vs field median 0.0%
0.00%0.10%0.20%

Field percentile: 34/100 among 2,405 eligible journals

34/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.34–1.17; median 0.67; n = 2,362 field journals.

Typical for field
0.62vs field median 0.67
0.00.51.01.5

Field percentile: 47/100 among 2,362 eligible journals

47/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 15.9%–50.5%; median 29.8%; n = 2,405 field journals.

Typical for field
32.5%vs field median 29.8%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 55/100 among 2,405 eligible journals

55/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 38.2%–51.4%; median 43.9%; n = 2,402 field journals.

Typical for field
45.1%vs field median 43.9%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 55/100 among 2,402 eligible journals

55/100