OpenJournalRank

Intelligent Marine Technology and Systems

Springer Science+Business Media

ISSN-L
2948-1953
OpenAlex ID
S4387292960
APC list price
$0
Full statisticsSubscription or hybridCore list

In 2025, Intelligent Marine Technology and Systems had an OJR of 1.55: its 2022–2024 papers received 1.5 times the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 5.38. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

Intelligent Marine Technology and Systems is Q1 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 Oceanography ranking (#5 of 50 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

OpenAlex-listed APC: US$0 (source snapshot September 23, 2026). Check current charges with the journal.

In context

How Intelligent Marine Technology and Systems compares with the journals of its comparison group: Earth and Planetary Sciences. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Middle half of the field: $2,290–$3,692; median $3,200; n = 236 field journals.

$0 listed
$0 listedvs field median $3,200
$0$2K$4K

Field percentile: 1/100 among 236 eligible journals

1/100

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

Middle half of the field: 3.7%–10.8%; median 6.5%; n = 303 field journals.

Typical for field
7.8%vs field median 6.5%
0%5%10%15%

Field percentile: 59/100 among 303 eligible journals

59/100

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 36.0%–100.0%; median 62.6%; n = 389 field journals.

Typical for field
100.0%vs field median 62.6%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 83/100 among 389 eligible journals

83/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

Middle half of the field: 26.6%–51.4%; median 37.4%; n = 369 field journals.

Below typical range
21.7%vs field median 37.4%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 16/100 among 369 eligible journals

16/100

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–0.0%; median 0.0%; n = 389 field journals.

Typical for field
0.0%vs field median 0.0%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 43/100 among 389 eligible journals

43/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.46–1.05; median 0.76; n = 387 field journals.

2.0× field median
1.55vs field median 0.76
0.01.02.0

Field percentile: 91/100 among 387 eligible journals

91/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 20.7%–47.6%; median 32.1%; n = 389 field journals.

Below typical range
16.7%vs field median 32.1%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 15/100 among 389 eligible journals

15/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 36.1%–48.6%; median 41.4%; n = 389 field journals.

Above typical range
49.2%vs field median 41.4%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 76/100 among 389 eligible journals

76/100