OpenJournalRank

Advances in Fuzzy Systems

Hindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom

ISSN-L
1687-7101
ISSN
1687-711X
OpenAlex ID
S117816480
APC list price
$1,000
Full statisticsOpen accessIn DOAJCore list

In 2025, Advances in Fuzzy Systems had an OJR of 0.82: its 2022–2024 papers received 82% of the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 2.11. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

Advances in Fuzzy Systems is Q2 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 Management Science and Operations Research ranking (#50 of 107 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

OpenAlex-listed APC: US$1,000 (source snapshot September 23, 2026). Check current charges with the journal.

In context

How Advances in Fuzzy Systems compares with the journals of its comparison group: Decision Sciences. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Middle half of the field: $2,550–$3,550; median $3,190; n = 77 field journals.

0.31× field median
$1,000vs field median $3,190
$0$2K$4K

Field percentile: 7/100 among 77 eligible journals

7/100

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 24.0%–100.0%; median 55.5%; n = 184 field journals.

Typical for field
100.0%vs field median 55.5%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 83/100 among 184 eligible journals

83/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

Middle half of the field: 19.8%–35.6%; median 26.3%; n = 170 field journals.

Above typical range
40.6%vs field median 26.3%
0%20%40%

Field percentile: 84/100 among 170 eligible journals

84/100

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

Middle half of the field: -18.3%–+26.7%; median +1.8%; n = 170 field journals.

Below typical range
-40.7%vs field median +1.8%
-60%-20%+20%

Field percentile: 6/100 among 170 eligible journals

6/100

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–1.3%; median 0.0%; n = 184 field journals.

Typical for field
0.0%vs field median 0.0%
0.0%0.5%1.0%1.5%

Field percentile: 28/100 among 184 eligible journals

28/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.43–1.37; median 0.81; n = 180 field journals.

Typical for field
0.82vs field median 0.81
0.00.51.01.5

Field percentile: 51/100 among 180 eligible journals

51/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 25.5%–57.1%; median 38.5%; n = 184 field journals.

Typical for field
40.6%vs field median 38.5%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 54/100 among 184 eligible journals

54/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 42.5%–56.7%; median 49.1%; n = 184 field journals.

Above typical range
61.4%vs field median 49.1%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 79/100 among 184 eligible journals

79/100