OpenJournalRank

Poverty & Public Policy

Wiley · Germany

ISSN-L
1944-2858
ISSN
2194-6027
OpenAlex ID
S139652661
APC list price
$2,900
Full statisticsSubscription or hybridCore list

In 2025, Poverty & Public Policy had an OJR of 1.14: its 2022–2024 papers received 1.1 times the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 1.78. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

Poverty & Public Policy is Q2 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 Sociology and Political Science ranking (#694 of 1,388 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

OpenAlex-listed APC: US$2,900 (source snapshot September 23, 2026). Check current charges with the journal.

In context

How Poverty & Public Policy compares with the journals of its comparison group: Social Sciences. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Middle half of the field: $2,900–$3,650; median $3,400; n = 1,164 field journals.

Typical for field
$2,900vs field median $3,400
$0$2K$4K

Field percentile: 26/100 among 1,164 eligible journals

26/100

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 33.5%–100.0%; median 58.5%; n = 3,066 field journals.

Typical for field
46.7%vs field median 58.5%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 38/100 among 3,066 eligible journals

38/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

Middle half of the field: 10.9%–26.7%; median 18.2%; n = 2,785 field journals.

Typical for field
18.6%vs field median 18.2%
0%10%20%30%

Field percentile: 51/100 among 2,785 eligible journals

51/100

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

Middle half of the field: -19.7%–+18.7%; median -2.6%; n = 2,852 field journals.

Typical for field
-3.2%vs field median -2.6%
-30%-10%+10%+30%

Field percentile: 49/100 among 2,852 eligible journals

49/100

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–1.3%; median 0.0%; n = 3,066 field journals.

Typical for field
0.0%vs field median 0.0%
0.0%0.5%1.0%1.5%

Field percentile: 30/100 among 3,066 eligible journals

30/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.61–2.15; median 1.22; n = 3,041 field journals.

Typical for field
1.14vs field median 1.22
0.01.02.0

Field percentile: 46/100 among 3,041 eligible journals

46/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 27.2%–64.9%; median 44.4%; n = 3,066 field journals.

Typical for field
35.0%vs field median 44.4%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 37/100 among 3,066 eligible journals

37/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 42.0%–61.1%; median 49.7%; n = 3,059 field journals.

Below typical range
37.0%vs field median 49.7%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 9/100 among 3,059 eligible journals

9/100