OpenJournalRank

European Review of Economic History

Oxford University Press · United Kingdom

ISSN-L
1361-4916
ISSN
1474-0044
OpenAlex ID
S176820844
APC list price
$4,468
Full statisticsSubscription or hybridCore list

In 2025, European Review of Economic History had an OJR of 0.83: its 2022–2024 papers received 83% of the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 1.00. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

European Review of Economic History is Q3 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 Economics and Econometrics ranking (#391 of 710 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

OpenAlex-listed APC: US$4,468 (source snapshot September 23, 2026). Check current charges with the journal.

In context

How European Review of Economic History compares with the journals of its comparison group: Economics, Econometrics and Finance. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Middle half of the field: $2,712–$3,598; median $3,275; n = 442 field journals.

Above typical range
$4,468vs field median $3,275
$0$2K$4K$6K

Field percentile: 93/100 among 442 eligible journals

93/100

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 32.5%–100.0%; median 59.7%; n = 853 field journals.

Typical for field
50.0%vs field median 59.7%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 42/100 among 853 eligible journals

42/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

Middle half of the field: 18.0%–36.5%; median 27.5%; n = 793 field journals.

Typical for field
35.2%vs field median 27.5%
0%20%40%

Field percentile: 72/100 among 793 eligible journals

72/100

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

Middle half of the field: -19.4%–+19.4%; median -3.6%; n = 787 field journals.

Typical for field
-5.1%vs field median -3.6%
-40%0%+40%

Field percentile: 47/100 among 787 eligible journals

47/100

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–0.6%; median 0.0%; n = 853 field journals.

Typical for field
0.0%vs field median 0.0%
0.0%0.4%0.8%

Field percentile: 34/100 among 853 eligible journals

34/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.46–1.67; median 0.94; n = 849 field journals.

Typical for field
0.83vs field median 0.94
0.01.02.0

Field percentile: 44/100 among 849 eligible journals

44/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 26.9%–62.5%; median 42.5%; n = 853 field journals.

Typical for field
45.9%vs field median 42.5%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 55/100 among 853 eligible journals

55/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 42.7%–59.5%; median 48.9%; n = 852 field journals.

Below typical range
41.3%vs field median 48.9%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 20/100 among 852 eligible journals

20/100