OpenJournalRank

Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry

Wiley · Germany

ISSN-L
2193-5807
ISSN
2193-5815
OpenAlex ID
S2491942749
APC list price
$4,030
Full statisticsSubscription or hybridCore list

In 2025, Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry had an OJR of 0.57: its 2022–2024 papers received 57% of the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 2.27. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry is Q2 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 Organic Chemistry ranking (#59 of 142 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

OpenAlex-listed APC: US$4,030 (source snapshot September 23, 2026). Check current charges with the journal.

In context

How Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry compares with the journals of its comparison group: Chemistry. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

The comparison is the pooled rate across 177 field journals (all their retracted papers divided by all their papers), so there is no percentile.

Near field rate
0.64per 1,000 papers, 2015–2024

2 retracted of 3,144 papers; field rate pooled across 177 journals

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Middle half of the field: $2,190–$4,110; median $3,610; n = 141 field journals.

Typical for field
$4,030vs field median $3,610
$0$2K$4K

Field percentile: 70/100 among 141 eligible journals

70/100

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

Middle half of the field: 1.8%–8.4%; median 4.3%; n = 197 field journals.

Typical for field
5.0%vs field median 4.3%
0%4%8%

Field percentile: 57/100 among 197 eligible journals

57/100

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 17.9%–100.0%; median 41.5%; n = 232 field journals.

Typical for field
28.6%vs field median 41.5%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 37/100 among 232 eligible journals

37/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

Middle half of the field: 14.0%–26.7%; median 20.0%; n = 228 field journals.

Typical for field
14.1%vs field median 20.0%
0%10%20%30%

Field percentile: 25/100 among 228 eligible journals

25/100

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

Middle half of the field: -27.7%–+7.2%; median -11.4%; n = 212 field journals.

Typical for field
+3.8%vs field median -11.4%
-40%-20%0%

Field percentile: 71/100 among 212 eligible journals

71/100

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–0.0%; median 0.0%; n = 232 field journals.

Typical for field
0.0%vs field median 0.0%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 38/100 among 232 eligible journals

38/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.29–0.79; median 0.51; n = 232 field journals.

Typical for field
0.57vs field median 0.51
0.00.40.8

Field percentile: 58/100 among 232 eligible journals

58/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 20.0%–50.3%; median 35.7%; n = 232 field journals.

Typical for field
27.9%vs field median 35.7%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 35/100 among 232 eligible journals

35/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 39.5%–52.9%; median 44.6%; n = 231 field journals.

Typical for field
41.2%vs field median 44.6%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 34/100 among 231 eligible journals

34/100