OpenJournalRank

Journal of Food Composition and Analysis

Elsevier BV · United States

ISSN-L
0889-1575
ISSN
1096-0481
OpenAlex ID
S25323420
APC list price
$3,450
Full statisticsSubscription or hybridCore list

In 2025, Journal of Food Composition and Analysis had an OJR of 1.46: its 2022–2024 papers received 1.5 times the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 5.52. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

Journal of Food Composition and Analysis is Q1 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 Analytical Chemistry ranking (#4 of 34 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

OpenAlex-listed APC: US$3,450 (source snapshot September 23, 2026). Check current charges with the journal.

In context

How Journal of Food Composition and Analysis compares with the journals of its comparison group: Chemistry. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

The comparison is the pooled rate across 177 field journals (all their retracted papers divided by all their papers), so there is no percentile.

0.42× field rate
0.24per 1,000 papers, 2015–2024

1 retracted of 4,204 papers; field rate pooled across 177 journals

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Middle half of the field: $2,190–$4,110; median $3,610; n = 141 field journals.

Typical for field
$3,450vs field median $3,610
$0$2K$4K

Field percentile: 44/100 among 141 eligible journals

44/100

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

Middle half of the field: 1.8%–8.4%; median 4.3%; n = 197 field journals.

Above typical range
8.5%vs field median 4.3%
0%4%8%

Field percentile: 75/100 among 197 eligible journals

75/100

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 17.9%–100.0%; median 41.5%; n = 232 field journals.

Typical for field
20.1%vs field median 41.5%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 28/100 among 232 eligible journals

28/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

Middle half of the field: 14.0%–26.7%; median 20.0%; n = 228 field journals.

Typical for field
21.0%vs field median 20.0%
0%10%20%30%

Field percentile: 52/100 among 228 eligible journals

52/100

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

Middle half of the field: -27.7%–+7.2%; median -11.4%; n = 212 field journals.

Above typical range
+148.4%vs field median -11.4%
-50%+50%+150%

Field percentile: 96/100 among 212 eligible journals

96/100

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–0.0%; median 0.0%; n = 232 field journals.

Above typical range
0.4%vs field median 0.0%
0.0%0.2%0.4%

Field percentile: 89/100 among 232 eligible journals

89/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.29–0.79; median 0.51; n = 232 field journals.

2.9× field median
1.47vs field median 0.51
0.01.02.0

Field percentile: 90/100 among 232 eligible journals

90/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 20.0%–50.3%; median 35.7%; n = 232 field journals.

0.24× field median
8.6%vs field median 35.7%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 7/100 among 232 eligible journals

7/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 39.5%–52.9%; median 44.6%; n = 231 field journals.

Below typical range
33.6%vs field median 44.6%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 5/100 among 231 eligible journals

5/100