OpenJournalRank

Religion Brain & Behavior

Taylor & Francis · United Kingdom

ISSN-L
2153-5981
ISSN
2153-599X
OpenAlex ID
S2764439977
APC list price
Not listed
Full statisticsSubscription or hybridCore list

In 2025, Religion Brain & Behavior had an OJR of 1.15: its 2022–2024 papers received 1.2 times the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 2.22. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

Religion Brain & Behavior is Q2 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 Sociology and Political Science ranking (#687 of 1,388 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

In context

How Religion Brain & Behavior compares with the journals of its comparison group: Social Sciences. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Not listed
Not listedfield median $3,400

OpenAlex has no listed APC for this journal, so there is no cost comparison.

Check the publisher’s author guidelines for current charges.

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

Middle half of the field: 2.1%–8.6%; median 4.7%; n = 1,882 field journals.

2.9× field median
13.8%vs field median 4.7%
0%5%10%15%

Field percentile: 90/100 among 1,882 eligible journals

90/100

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 33.5%–100.0%; median 58.5%; n = 3,066 field journals.

Typical for field
40.5%vs field median 58.5%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 32/100 among 3,066 eligible journals

32/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

Middle half of the field: 10.9%–26.7%; median 18.2%; n = 2,785 field journals.

Above typical range
30.9%vs field median 18.2%
0%20%40%

Field percentile: 84/100 among 2,785 eligible journals

84/100

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

Middle half of the field: -19.7%–+18.7%; median -2.6%; n = 2,852 field journals.

Above typical range
+109.4%vs field median -2.6%
-50%+50%+150%

Field percentile: 96/100 among 2,852 eligible journals

96/100

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–1.3%; median 0.0%; n = 3,066 field journals.

Above typical range
1.8%vs field median 0.0%
0.0%1.0%2.0%

Field percentile: 82/100 among 3,066 eligible journals

82/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.61–2.15; median 1.22; n = 3,041 field journals.

Typical for field
1.24vs field median 1.22
0.01.02.0

Field percentile: 51/100 among 3,041 eligible journals

51/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 27.2%–64.9%; median 44.4%; n = 3,066 field journals.

Typical for field
55.0%vs field median 44.4%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 63/100 among 3,066 eligible journals

63/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 42.0%–61.1%; median 49.7%; n = 3,059 field journals.

Above typical range
69.9%vs field median 49.7%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 86/100 among 3,059 eligible journals

86/100