OpenJournalRank

Research on World Agricultural Economy

Publisher not recorded · Singapore

ISSN-L
2737-4777
ISSN
2737-4785, 2737-4858, 2737-4866
OpenAlex ID
S4210177428
APC list price
$400
Full statisticsOpen accessCore list

In 2025, Research on World Agricultural Economy had an OJR of 0.84: its 2022–2024 papers received 84% of the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 1.57. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

Research on World Agricultural Economy is Q3 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 General Agricultural and Biological Sciences ranking (#18 of 33 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

OpenAlex-listed APC: US$400 (source snapshot September 23, 2026). Check current charges with the journal.

In context

How Research on World Agricultural Economy compares with the journals of its comparison group: Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Middle half of the field: $1,590–$3,690; median $3,000; n = 600 field journals.

0.13× field median
$400vs field median $3,000
$0$2K$4K

Field percentile: 9/100 among 600 eligible journals

9/100

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

Middle half of the field: 1.5%–6.7%; median 3.8%; n = 812 field journals.

Typical for field
2.8%vs field median 3.8%
0%4%8%

Field percentile: 42/100 among 812 eligible journals

42/100

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 40.5%–100.0%; median 100.0%; n = 1,096 field journals.

Typical for field
100.0%vs field median 100.0%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 73/100 among 1,096 eligible journals

73/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

Middle half of the field: 18.8%–34.7%; median 25.7%; n = 1,043 field journals.

Typical for field
26.2%vs field median 25.7%
0%20%40%

Field percentile: 52/100 among 1,043 eligible journals

52/100

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

Middle half of the field: -23.3%–+19.3%; median -5.7%; n = 996 field journals.

Above typical range
+157.7%vs field median -5.7%
-50%+50%+150%

Field percentile: 96/100 among 996 eligible journals

96/100

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–0.8%; median 0.0%; n = 1,096 field journals.

Above typical range
2.2%vs field median 0.0%
0%1%2%3%

Field percentile: 92/100 among 1,096 eligible journals

92/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.30–1.15; median 0.62; n = 1,087 field journals.

Typical for field
0.91vs field median 0.62
0.00.51.01.5

Field percentile: 65/100 among 1,087 eligible journals

65/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 18.5%–57.0%; median 34.5%; n = 1,096 field journals.

Typical for field
43.3%vs field median 34.5%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 59/100 among 1,096 eligible journals

59/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 38.2%–51.7%; median 43.9%; n = 1,095 field journals.

Typical for field
50.5%vs field median 43.9%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 72/100 among 1,095 eligible journals

72/100