OpenJournalRank

Fruit Research

Publisher not recorded · United States

ISSN-L
2769-4615
OpenAlex ID
S4210226955
APC list price
Not listed
Full statisticsOpen accessIn DOAJCore list

In 2025, Fruit Research had an OJR of 0.74: its 2022–2024 papers received 74% of the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 2.48. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

Fruit Research is Q2 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 Plant Science ranking (#214 of 551 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

In context

How Fruit Research compares with the journals of its comparison group: Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Not listed
Not listedfield median $3,000

OpenAlex has no listed APC for this journal, so there is no cost comparison.

Check the publisher’s author guidelines for current charges.

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

Middle half of the field: 1.5%–6.7%; median 3.8%; n = 812 field journals.

Typical for field
5.8%vs field median 3.8%
0%4%8%

Field percentile: 70/100 among 812 eligible journals

70/100

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 40.5%–100.0%; median 100.0%; n = 1,096 field journals.

Typical for field
100.0%vs field median 100.0%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 73/100 among 1,096 eligible journals

73/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

Middle half of the field: 18.8%–34.7%; median 25.7%; n = 1,043 field journals.

Typical for field
20.8%vs field median 25.7%
0%20%40%

Field percentile: 32/100 among 1,043 eligible journals

32/100

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–0.8%; median 0.0%; n = 1,096 field journals.

Typical for field
0.0%vs field median 0.0%
0.0%0.4%0.8%

Field percentile: 27/100 among 1,096 eligible journals

27/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.30–1.15; median 0.62; n = 1,087 field journals.

Typical for field
0.74vs field median 0.62
0.00.51.01.5

Field percentile: 57/100 among 1,087 eligible journals

57/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 18.5%–57.0%; median 34.5%; n = 1,096 field journals.

Below typical range
17.6%vs field median 34.5%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 23/100 among 1,096 eligible journals

23/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 38.2%–51.7%; median 43.9%; n = 1,095 field journals.

Below typical range
36.3%vs field median 43.9%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 16/100 among 1,095 eligible journals

16/100