OpenJournalRank

AJPM Focus

Elsevier BV · United States

ISSN-L
2773-0654
OpenAlex ID
S4220651960
APC list price
$1,910
Full statisticsOpen accessIn DOAJCore list

In 2025, AJPM Focus had an OJR of 1.16: its 2022–2024 papers received 1.2 times the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 2.48. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

AJPM Focus is Q2 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 General Health Professions ranking (#155 of 466 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

OpenAlex-listed APC: US$1,910 (source snapshot September 23, 2026). Check current charges with the journal.

In context

How AJPM Focus compares with the journals of its comparison group: Health Professions. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Middle half of the field: $2,231–$3,910; median $3,290; n = 259 field journals.

Below typical range
$1,910vs field median $3,290
$0$2K$4K

Field percentile: 17/100 among 259 eligible journals

17/100

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

Middle half of the field: 1.6%–7.7%; median 3.6%; n = 405 field journals.

0.35× field median
1.3%vs field median 3.6%
0%4%8%

Field percentile: 19/100 among 405 eligible journals

19/100

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 36.8%–100.0%; median 74.5%; n = 586 field journals.

Typical for field
100.0%vs field median 74.5%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 80/100 among 586 eligible journals

80/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

Middle half of the field: 11.7%–27.2%; median 19.6%; n = 558 field journals.

Below typical range
11.3%vs field median 19.6%
0%10%20%30%

Field percentile: 22/100 among 558 eligible journals

22/100

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–4.2%; median 1.8%; n = 586 field journals.

Typical for field
2.3%vs field median 1.8%
0%2%4%

Field percentile: 58/100 among 586 eligible journals

58/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.41–1.35; median 0.86; n = 581 field journals.

Typical for field
1.14vs field median 0.86
0.00.51.01.5

Field percentile: 66/100 among 581 eligible journals

66/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 26.7%–61.3%; median 41.6%; n = 586 field journals.

Below typical range
25.1%vs field median 41.6%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 22/100 among 586 eligible journals

22/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 42.2%–58.7%; median 47.9%; n = 585 field journals.

Typical for field
46.9%vs field median 47.9%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 45/100 among 585 eligible journals

45/100