OpenJournalRank

Current Medicine

Springer Science+Business Media

ISSN-L
2731-0868
OpenAlex ID
S4387280534
APC list price
$1,570
Full statisticsSubscription or hybridCore list

In 2025, Current Medicine had an OJR of 1.04: its 2022–2024 papers received 1.0 times the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 4.00. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

Current Medicine is Q2 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 Molecular Biology ranking (#480 of 1,152 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

OpenAlex-listed APC: US$1,570 (source snapshot September 23, 2026). Check current charges with the journal.

In context

How Current Medicine compares with the journals of its comparison group: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Middle half of the field: $2,480–$4,090; median $3,300; n = 943 field journals.

0.48× field median
$1,570vs field median $3,300
$0$2K$4K

Field percentile: 13/100 among 943 eligible journals

13/100

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

Middle half of the field: 0.8%–4.1%; median 1.9%; n = 1,206 field journals.

Below typical range
0.0%vs field median 1.9%
0%2%4%

Field percentile: 3/100 among 1,206 eligible journals

3/100

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 43.8%–100.0%; median 100.0%; n = 1,367 field journals.

Typical for field
100.0%vs field median 100.0%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 75/100 among 1,367 eligible journals

75/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

Middle half of the field: 17.4%–31.6%; median 24.4%; n = 1,335 field journals.

Typical for field
31.6%vs field median 24.4%
0%20%40%

Field percentile: 75/100 among 1,335 eligible journals

75/100

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–1.7%; median 0.3%; n = 1,367 field journals.

Typical for field
0.0%vs field median 0.3%
0.0%1.0%2.0%

Field percentile: 21/100 among 1,367 eligible journals

21/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.53–1.35; median 0.87; n = 1,336 field journals.

Typical for field
1.04vs field median 0.87
0.00.51.01.5

Field percentile: 61/100 among 1,336 eligible journals

61/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 13.1%–36.3%; median 22.7%; n = 1,367 field journals.

Above typical range
39.5%vs field median 22.7%
0%20%40%

Field percentile: 78/100 among 1,367 eligible journals

78/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 37.8%–49.2%; median 42.1%; n = 1,363 field journals.

Typical for field
45.7%vs field median 42.1%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 65/100 among 1,363 eligible journals

65/100