OpenJournalRank

Sport & Exercise Psychology Review

British Psychological Society

ISSN-L
1745-4980
ISSN
2396-961X
OpenAlex ID
S4387286394
APC list price
Not listed
Full statisticsSubscription or hybridCore list

In 2025, Sport & Exercise Psychology Review had an OJR of 0.50: its 2022–2024 papers received 50% of the world-average citations for comparable papers. Its Impact factor (2-year) was 1.05. Both figures are calculated from OpenAlex data.

Sport & Exercise Psychology Review is Q4 in OpenJournalRank’s 2025 Developmental and Educational Psychology ranking (#103 of 121 eligible journals). These are OJR quartiles, calculated independently of SCImago, Scopus and JCR quartiles.

In context

How Sport & Exercise Psychology Review compares with the journals of its comparison group: Psychology. Windows are 2022–2024 (retractions 2015–2024).

Each group is the journal’s field, or its domain when the field has too few eligible journals. On each value track the shaded band is the middle half of the group and the tick its median. The percentile under it is a mid-rank position out of 100: journals with a lower value count fully and tied journals count half, so ties share a mid-rank. Colour marks only retractions, cost and an unusual self-citation share; other differences carry no quality judgement.

How field comparisons work

  • This journal
  • Median
  • Middle half of field

Integrity and cost

Retracted papers per 1,000

Papers marked retracted per 1,000 citable papers at the OpenAlex snapshot date; this does not show the reasons for retraction or assess a journal’s practices.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Listed APC (USD)

The article processing charge OpenAlex lists for the source; zero means a listed charge of $0.

Not listed
Not listedfield median $3,390

OpenAlex has no listed APC for this journal, so there is no cost comparison.

Check the publisher’s author guidelines for current charges.

Journal self-citation share

Share of citations to window papers that come from the same journal; a high share can reflect a narrow specialty and is not evidence of misconduct.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Openness and reach

Open access share

Share of window papers marked open access among papers with known OA status.

Middle half of the field: 32.7%–100.0%; median 55.7%; n = 1,032 field journals.

Typical for field
39.4%vs field median 55.7%
0%40%80%

Field percentile: 31/100 among 1,032 eligible journals

31/100

International collaboration share

Share of window papers with at least two distinct affiliation countries among papers with a known country.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Output growth

Change in citable paper counts between two adjacent three-year windows; it does not show changes in research quality or explain why output changed.

No comparison
—

Comparison group too small or not enough papers for this measure.

Document mix

Review share

Reviews as a share of all citable window papers.

Middle half of the field: 0.0%–4.7%; median 2.1%; n = 1,032 field journals.

Typical for field
3.0%vs field median 2.1%
0%2%4%6%

Field percentile: 61/100 among 1,032 eligible journals

61/100

Articles-only OJR

OJR for classified window articles only, using the same baseline cells as the overall score.

Middle half of the field: 0.51–1.55; median 0.96; n = 1,023 field journals.

Typical for field
0.59vs field median 0.96
0.01.02.0

Field percentile: 29/100 among 1,023 eligible journals

29/100

Citation distribution

Uncited share

Share of window papers receiving no non-self citations in the indicator year.

Middle half of the field: 23.8%–56.8%; median 36.5%; n = 1,032 field journals.

Typical for field
51.5%vs field median 36.5%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 71/100 among 1,032 eligible journals

71/100

Citation concentration

Share of non-self citations received by the journal’s most-cited 10% of window papers.

Middle half of the field: 40.6%–54.9%; median 45.5%; n = 1,030 field journals.

Typical for field
47.2%vs field median 45.5%
0%20%40%60%

Field percentile: 56/100 among 1,030 eligible journals

56/100