OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2001

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Field ranking · 2001

Agricultural and Biological Sciences journal rankings 2001

569 ranked journals · Field in Life Sciences

Agricultural and Biological Sciences has 569 ranked journals in 2001. The median journal has an OJR of 0.41, below the world average of 1.00, down 0.04 on 2000; Q1 starts at OJR 0.83. The top three are Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, Sociologia Ruralis, and The American Naturalist.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2001. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 score is computed on.

569
37% of Life Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.41-0.04 vs 2000
This fieldAll 0.68World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

25%
All fields: 12%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,546
Median positive listed APC: $3,546 among 274 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 294 have no known price. All fields: $3,560.

Subfields in Agricultural and Biological Sciences (11)

Up to Life Sciences

569 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Agricultural and Biological Sciences ranking, 2001

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2000. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 1998–2000 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2001.

Compare
1Annual Review of Ecology and SystematicsAnnual Reviews · United States
9.20Q17.93no change635%—
2Sociologia RuralisWiley · Netherlands
4.17Q11.36 0.12 up from 20009014%$3,920
3The American NaturalistUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
3.95Q14.28 0.03 up from 20004157%—
4The Journal of Peasant StudiesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
3.86Q11.14 0.59 up from 2000793%—
5Annals of the Missouri Botanical GardenMissouri Botanical Garden · United States
3.78Q13.03 2.07 down from 20009411%—
6Molecular Plant-Microbe InteractionsOAAmerican Phytopathological Society · United States
3.51Q14.40 0.31 up from 200042854%$3,000
7The Plant JournalWiley · United Kingdom
3.34Q15.88 0.61 down from 200094051%$5,450
8The Plant CellOxford University Press · United States
3.26Q15.96 0.32 down from 20001,12039%$4,934
9Critical Reviews in Plant SciencesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
3.17Q13.04 0.04 up from 20001220%—
10Critical Reviews in Food Science and NutritionTaylor & Francis · United States
3.15Q13.55 0.03 up from 20003812%—
11OikosWiley · United Kingdom
3.03Q12.84 0.09 up from 200071513%$3,640
12Plant Cell & EnvironmentWiley · United Kingdom
2.97Q13.79 0.65 up from 200040863%$5,440
2.91Q13.73 0.07 up from 20001,06697%—
14Journal of Rural StudiesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
2.89Q11.25 0.14 down from 20001492%$4,090
15PLANT PHYSIOLOGYOxford University Press · United States
2.72Q14.90 0.16 up from 20001,56769%$3,851
2.59Q12.26 0.30 down from 2000340%$3,570
17Behavioral EcologyOxford University Press · United Kingdom
2.58Q12.65 0.13 up from 200027533%$3,906
18Animal BehaviourElsevier BV · United Kingdom
2.46Q12.69 0.33 up from 20008885%$2,740
19New PhytologistWiley · United Kingdom
2.45Q12.68 0.25 up from 200063649%$5,790
20Functional EcologyOAWiley · United Kingdom
2.32Q12.00 0.02 down from 200034353%$3,000
2.26Q11.67 0.29 up from 20007715%$2,020
22Molecular Phylogenetics and EvolutionElsevier BV · United States
2.25Q13.27 0.52 down from 20003933%$3,830
23Behavioral Ecology and SociobiologySpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
2.25Q12.34 0.03 down from 200037312%$3,590
24PlantaSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
2.24Q13.64 0.05 up from 20006865%$4,590
25The Botanical ReviewSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.24Q11.52 0.75 down from 2000437%$3,790
26Systematic BotanyAmerican Society of Plant Taxonomists · United States
2.17Q12.00 0.56 down from 20001510%—
27Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.15Q11.81 0.61 up from 200036312%$4,190
28Ecology LettersWiley · United Kingdom
2.07Q12.06 0.01 down from 200019315%$5,300
29European Journal of Soil ScienceWiley · United Kingdom
2.07Q11.43 0.09 down from 200023512%$4,490
30Journal of Agricultural EconomicsWiley · United Kingdom
2.06Q10.84 0.06 up from 200012822%$4,150
31GeodermaOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.02Q11.77 0.62 up from 20003188%$3,320
32American Journal of BotanyWiley · United States
1.91Q12.31 0.22 down from 200062727%$2,660
33Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global ChangeSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.89Q11.09 0.15 down from 20006310%$3,490
34Soil Biology and BiochemistryElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.89Q11.85 0.11 down from 20007048%$4,950
35Soil ScienceLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
1.84Q11.42 0.34 up from 20003369%—
36Plant Molecular BiologySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.83Q13.62 0.54 up from 20008527%$4,590
37Food technologyInstitute of Food Technologists · United States
1.80Q11.10 0.90 down from 2000760%—
38Physiological and Biochemical ZoologyUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
1.80Q12.09 0.86 up from 200016711%—
39EvolutionOxford University Press · United States
1.78Q12.59 0.39 down from 20001,26110%$3,214
40CATENAElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.78Q11.69 0.50 up from 20002037%$3,680
41Journal of Evolutionary BiologyOxford University Press · Switzerland
1.75Q12.54 0.62 up from 200030037%$3,123
42CladisticsWiley · United States
1.72Q13.52 1.26 up from 200017733%$3,960
43Physiological and Molecular Plant PathologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.71Q12.68 0.38 up from 20001618%$3,550
44EthologyWiley · Germany
1.68Q11.83 0.40 up from 200028712%$4,650
45Field Crops ResearchElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.67Q11.80 0.47 up from 20003208%$3,680
46Theoretical and Applied GeneticsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.64Q12.44 0.11 down from 20001,0135%$5,190
47Journal of Soil and Water ConservationSoil and Water Conservation Society · United States
1.62Q11.06 0.02 up from 20001764%—
48Trends in Food Science & TechnologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.61Q11.33 0.43 down from 20001743%$5,440
49Agricultural SystemsElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.61Q11.02 0.11 up from 200020616%$4,000
50Biology and Fertility of SoilsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.61Q11.19 0.17 down from 20004435%$4,790

Citations made in 2001. Corpus-wide, 67.0% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

211 additional Agricultural and Biological Sciences journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1998–2000, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2001. Publication window: 1998–2000. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
569
Window papers (baseline)
231,427 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Median OJR
0.412 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Rising journals (2025)
86Comparison-group list (86)

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1998–2000 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals5115695956316276436706967077558098579029561,0071,0661,0981,1191,1331,1341,1301,1171,1141,1051,0941,096
Window papers (baseline)200,144231,427246,134264,449261,081277,391297,451323,008349,012381,325425,469471,184501,593520,260541,091572,424593,779602,980613,440635,565669,420715,658750,083770,538777,286816,566
Median OJR0.4480.4120.4090.4540.4500.4140.4620.4630.5560.530.540.650.660.630.62410.5870.5570.5630.550.5940.624870.624850.6150.62430.610.617
Category context (2025)
MeasureCategory statisticEligible population
Journal self-citation shareMedian: 3.8%812 journals
Retracted papers per 1,000Pooled rate: 0.681 per 1,000783 journals
Output growthMedian: -5.7%996 journals
Open access shareMedian: 100.0%1,096 journals
Listed APC (USD)Median including $0 listed prices: $3,000600 ranked journals with a known listed price, including $0 listed prices
International collaboration shareMedian: 25.7%1,043 journals
Review shareMedian: 0.0%1,096 journals
Articles-only OJRMedian: 0.621,087 journals
Uncited shareMedian: 34.5%1,096 journals
Citation concentrationMedian: 43.9%1,095 journals

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.