OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2001

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Domain ranking · 2001

Life Sciences journal rankings 2001

1,528 ranked journals · Domain

Life Sciences has 1,528 ranked journals in 2001. The median journal has an OJR of 0.62, below the world average of 1.00, up 0.03 on 2000; Q1 starts at OJR 1.06. The top three are Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, Cell, and Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2001. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 score is computed on.

1,528
15% of all ranked journals
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.62+0.03 vs 2000
This domainAll 0.68World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

19%
All fields: 12%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,790
Median positive listed APC: $3,790 among 837 journals. Another 4 list $0; 687 have no known price. All fields: $3,560.

Fields in Life Sciences (5)

Up to All journals

1,528 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Life Sciences ranking, 2001

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2000. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 1998–2000 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2001.

Compare
11.11Q119.09 3.27 up from 2000733%—
2CellCell Press · United States
10.19Q126.69 4.11 down from 20001,21594%$11,400
3Annual Review of Ecology and SystematicsAnnual Reviews · United States
9.20Q17.93no change635%—
4Pharmacological ReviewsAmerican Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · United States
8.65Q119.14 4.94 up from 2000757%$4,500
5Nature GeneticsNature Portfolio · United States
8.28Q119.85 0.12 up from 20001,06039%$12,690
6NatureNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
6.97Q19.18 0.07 down from 20008,83710%$12,690
6.73Q115.88 0.74 down from 2000520%—
8ImmunityCell Press · United States
6.56Q119.10 1.91 down from 200046694%$10,400
9Molecular CellElsevier BV · United States
6.12Q115.88 2.88 down from 2000662100%$10,400
10Frontiers in NeuroendocrinologyElsevier BV · United States
5.52Q114.76 4.55 up from 2000379%$4,800
11Nature Cell BiologyNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
5.44Q114.33 1.65 up from 200044011%$12,690
12The Journal of Experimental MedicineRockefeller University Press · United States
5.21Q115.06 0.11 up from 20001,28098%—
13NeuronCell Press · United States
5.04Q112.93 1.62 down from 200091398%$10,400
14Journal of Clinical InvestigationOAAmerican Society for Clinical Investigation · United States
5.04Q112.51 0.39 up from 20001,47990%$5,200
4.89Q19.45 2.87 down from 200042——
16The EMBO JournalOASpringer Nature · Germany
4.82Q112.71 1.67 down from 20002,05496%$7,990
17ScienceAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science · United States
4.73Q15.89 0.51 down from 200012,8483%—
18Nature NeuroscienceNature Portfolio · United States
4.62Q111.14 1.11 up from 200066611%$12,690
19Progress in NeurobiologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.58Q110.11 0.33 down from 20002076%$5,190
20Cognitive PsychologyElsevier BV · United States
4.48Q14.84 0.57 up from 2000580%$3,570
21Nature ImmunologyNature Portfolio · United States
4.45Q110.54no 2000 value11711%$12,690—
22Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNational Academy of Sciences · United States
4.38Q110.24 0.32 down from 20008,43991%—
23The Journal of Cell BiologyRockefeller University Press · United States
4.28Q111.95 1.54 down from 20001,67796%—
24Brain Research ReviewsElsevier BV · Netherlands
4.22Q19.26 0.98 down from 20001986%—
25Sociologia RuralisWiley · Netherlands
4.17Q11.36 0.12 up from 20009014%$3,920
26Psychological ReviewAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.99Q13.90 0.14 down from 20002223%—
27The American NaturalistUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
3.95Q14.28 0.03 up from 20004157%—
28The Journal of Peasant StudiesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
3.86Q11.14 0.59 up from 2000793%—
29Annual Review of ImmunologyAnnual Reviews · United States
3.78Q148.65 3.88 down from 2000844%—
30Annals of the Missouri Botanical GardenMissouri Botanical Garden · United States
3.78Q13.03 2.07 down from 20009411%—
31Human Molecular GeneticsOxford University Press · United Kingdom
3.71Q19.65 0.10 down from 200089918%$4,390
32Annual Review of BiochemistryAnnual Reviews · United States
3.66Q135.16 11.91 down from 2000884%—
33Journal of Cognitive NeuroscienceThe MIT Press · United States
3.65Q16.15 1.52 up from 200024612%—
34Systematic BiologyOxford University Press · United States
3.63Q15.99 0.75 up from 200018323%$2,166
35Molecular Plant-Microbe InteractionsOAAmerican Phytopathological Society · United States
3.51Q14.40 0.31 up from 200042854%$3,000
36Neural ComputationThe MIT Press · United States
3.47Q14.83 1.11 up from 200033210%—
37The Plant JournalWiley · United Kingdom
3.34Q15.88 0.61 down from 200094051%$5,450
38Critical Reviews in NeurobiologyBegell House · United States
3.28Q15.52 3.29 down from 200037——
39Circulation ResearchLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
3.27Q18.20 0.19 up from 20001,09656%—
40The Plant CellOxford University Press · United States
3.26Q15.96 0.32 down from 20001,12039%$4,934
41The American Journal of Human GeneticsElsevier BV · United States
3.22Q17.66 0.17 down from 20001,48185%$5,150
42Molecular and Cellular BiologyTaylor & Francis · United States
3.21Q19.27 0.50 down from 20002,62099%—
43Critical Reviews in Plant SciencesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
3.17Q13.04 0.04 up from 20001220%—
44Critical Reviews in Food Science and NutritionTaylor & Francis · United States
3.15Q13.55 0.03 up from 20003812%—
45Progress in Lipid ResearchElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.13Q14.67 0.82 down from 2000470%$5,530
46Journal of NeuroscienceSociety for Neuroscience · United States
3.12Q18.54 0.43 down from 20003,14499%—
47OikosWiley · United Kingdom
3.03Q12.84 0.09 up from 200071513%$3,640
48CognitionElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.03Q13.15 0.04 up from 20001876%$3,910
49American Journal Of PathologyElsevier BV · United States
2.99Q16.84 0.52 up from 20001,11299%$2,800
50Cerebral CortexOxford University Press · United States
2.99Q16.92 1.66 up from 200026927%$5,038

Citations made in 2001. Corpus-wide, 67.0% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

493 additional Life Sciences journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1998–2000, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2001. Publication window: 1998–2000. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
1,528
Window papers (baseline)
747,894 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Median OJR
0.62 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Rising journals (2025)
273

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1998–2000 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1,4161,5281,6151,7121,7311,8011,8651,9562,0042,0962,2222,3552,4842,5992,7052,8382,9232,9833,0273,0373,0153,0003,0303,0323,0143,016
Window papers (baseline)681,698747,894789,157838,563854,790911,302969,9831,041,3011,106,2851,194,9951,291,8161,389,1751,451,1511,495,4991,547,9781,608,2801,646,1561,651,7901,653,5661,677,6611,731,4631,821,7341,907,3161,955,1911,960,7792,008,547
Median OJR0.590.620.630.690.710.740.7780.8100.8130.8690.86750.900.910.8730.86780.830.81770.81800.809250.8060.8140.809310.800.7840.770.79
Category context (2025)
MeasureCategory statisticEligible population
Journal self-citation shareMedian: 2.5%2,489 journals
Retracted papers per 1,000Pooled rate: 3.276 per 1,0002,252 journals
Output growthMedian: -7.1%2,737 journals
Open access shareMedian: 99.1%3,016 journals
Listed APC (USD)Median including $0 listed prices: $3,2581,900 ranked journals with a known listed price, including $0 listed prices
International collaboration shareMedian: 25.1%2,917 journals
Review shareMedian: 0.3%3,016 journals
Articles-only OJRMedian: 0.792,965 journals
Uncited shareMedian: 26.6%3,016 journals
Citation concentrationMedian: 42.9%3,011 journals

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.