OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2012

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Domain ranking · 2012

Life Sciences journal rankings 2012

2,484 ranked journals · Domain

Life Sciences has 2,484 ranked journals in 2012. The median journal has an OJR of 0.91, below the world average of 1.00, up 0.01 on 2011; Q1 starts at OJR 1.53. The top three are Nature Genetics, The Journal of Peasant Studies, and Pharmacological Reviews.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2012. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2009–2011, the window the 2012 score is computed on.

2,484
15% of all ranked journals
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.91+0.01 vs 2011
This domainAll 0.94World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

31%
All fields: 24%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,550
Median positive listed APC: $3,550 among 1,342 journals. Another 9 list $0; 1,133 have no known price. All fields: $3,413.

Fields in Life Sciences (5)

Up to All journals

2,484 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Life Sciences ranking, 2012

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2011. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2009–2011, the window the 2012 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2009–2011 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2003 to 2012.

Compare
1Nature GeneticsNature Portfolio · United States
12.22Q129.44 2.95 down from 201182057%$12,690
2The Journal of Peasant StudiesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
10.80Q18.37 3.11 up from 201113423%—
3Pharmacological ReviewsAmerican Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · United States
10.21Q127.63 2.95 up from 20118135%$4,500
4CellCell Press · United States
9.89Q125.42 0.85 up from 20111,664100%$11,400
5Ecology LettersWiley · United Kingdom
8.82Q112.29 0.53 up from 201144423%$5,300
6NatureNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
6.97Q112.72 0.98 up from 20119,69931%$12,690
7Nature ImmunologyNature Portfolio · United States
6.65Q118.89 0.95 down from 201165346%$12,690
8Cell stem cellElsevier BV · United States
6.64Q118.30 0.35 up from 2011559100%$10,400
9FEMS Microbiology ReviewsOAOxford University Press · Netherlands
6.33Q112.75 0.08 down from 201117273%$3,297
10Nature Cell BiologyNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
6.19Q117.66 2.37 up from 201170448%$12,690
11Psychological ReviewAmerican Psychological Association · United States
6.16Q111.17 2.13 up from 201115526%—
12Nature CommunicationsOANature Portfolio · United Kingdom
6.10Q112.49 2.61 up from 201160699%$6,990
13ImmunityCell Press · United States
5.97Q117.34 1.38 down from 2011635100%$10,400
14ScienceAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science · United States
5.62Q18.31 0.05 up from 201112,46823%—
15Current Directions in Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
5.34Q17.17 0.19 up from 201121619%$3,900
16Nature NeuroscienceNature Portfolio · United States
5.28Q113.75 0.85 down from 201186865%$12,690
17NeuronCell Press · United States
5.27Q115.53 1.54 up from 20111,21999%$10,400
18Progress in Lipid ResearchElsevier BV · United Kingdom
5.25Q112.75 0.81 up from 20118913%$5,530
19Nature BiotechnologyNature Portfolio · United States
5.19Q111.76 2.41 up from 20111,10027%$12,690
20The Plant CellOxford University Press · United States
5.17Q110.20 0.37 up from 201198599%$4,934
21Journal of Clinical InvestigationOAAmerican Society for Clinical Investigation · United States
5.17Q112.39 0.23 down from 20111,44799%$5,200
22Systematic BiologyOxford University Press · United States
5.09Q18.87 0.25 up from 201127049%$2,166
23Biotechnology AdvancesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
5.05Q19.97 0.80 down from 201135419%$5,460
24Critical Reviews in Plant SciencesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
5.05Q16.57 0.32 up from 20117213%—
25Cell MetabolismCell Press · United States
4.89Q113.18 1.77 up from 2011483100%$10,400
26Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNational Academy of Sciences · United States
4.84Q111.23 0.05 down from 201112,345100%—
27Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United States
4.80Q16.68 0.37 up from 201181728%$3,900
28Journal of Rural StudiesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.78Q13.10 0.85 up from 201113924%$4,090
29Cognitive PsychologyElsevier BV · United States
4.75Q17.14 1.41 up from 20116536%$3,570
30Molecular CellElsevier BV · United States
4.74Q114.45 0.89 up from 20111,145100%$10,400
31Molecular Aspects of MedicineElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.71Q112.05 0.39 up from 20118747%$5,220
32Molecular Systems BiologyOASpringer Nature · United Kingdom
4.67Q113.59 3.74 up from 2011319100%$7,990
33Journal of Agrarian ChangeWiley · United Kingdom
4.66Q12.42 0.52 up from 201112018%$3,820
34Drug Resistance UpdatesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.63Q112.34 1.94 up from 20116452%$5,410
35The Journal of Experimental MedicineRockefeller University Press · United States
4.56Q113.56 1.18 up from 201190994%—
4.55Q17.25 1.20 up from 2011815%$5,000
37Nature ProtocolsNature Portfolio · United States
4.54Q110.38 0.11 down from 201149549%—
38Frontiers in NeuroendocrinologyElsevier BV · United States
4.52Q19.00 3.52 down from 201111158%$4,800
39PLANT PHYSIOLOGYOxford University Press · United States
4.46Q18.38 0.34 up from 20111,61285%$3,851
40New PhytologistWiley · United Kingdom
4.39Q16.62 0.02 up from 20111,23354%$5,790
41Cell Host & MicrobeCell Press · United States
4.38Q110.73 0.46 down from 2011411100%$10,400
42PLoS BiologyOAPublic Library of Science · United States
4.33Q110.63 0.66 up from 2011854100%$5,500
43Progress in NeurobiologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.31Q111.04 0.13 down from 201124948%$5,190
44Developmental CellElsevier BV · United States
4.27Q111.07 0.78 down from 201167699%$10,400
45The American Journal of Human GeneticsElsevier BV · United States
4.27Q110.95 0.35 down from 201169292%$5,150
46Reviews in AquacultureWiley · United Kingdom
4.25Q12.76 1.05 down from 20115143%$4,480
47Sociologia RuralisWiley · Netherlands
4.23Q12.00 0.27 down from 20117632%$3,920
48The Plant JournalWiley · United Kingdom
4.20Q17.82 0.18 up from 20111,07457%$5,450
49Nature Structural & Molecular BiologyNature Portfolio · United States
4.19Q111.82 0.01 up from 201175756%$12,690
50Molecular Biology and EvolutionOAOxford University Press · United States
4.14Q110.49 5.12 up from 201197981%$3,418

Citations made in 2012. Corpus-wide, 75.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

800 additional Life Sciences journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2009–2011, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2012. Publication window: 2009–2011. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
2,484
Window papers (baseline)
1,451,151 +21.4% from indicator year 2009
Median OJR
0.91 +4.8% from indicator year 2009
Rising journals (2025)
273

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2009–2011 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1,4161,5281,6151,7121,7311,8011,8651,9562,0042,0962,2222,3552,4842,5992,7052,8382,9232,9833,0273,0373,0153,0003,0303,0323,0143,016
Window papers (baseline)681,698747,894789,157838,563854,790911,302969,9831,041,3011,106,2851,194,9951,291,8161,389,1751,451,1511,495,4991,547,9781,608,2801,646,1561,651,7901,653,5661,677,6611,731,4631,821,7341,907,3161,955,1911,960,7792,008,547
Median OJR0.590.620.630.690.710.740.7780.8100.8130.8690.86750.900.910.8730.86780.830.81770.81800.809250.8060.8140.809310.800.7840.770.79
Category context (2025)
MeasureCategory statisticEligible population
Journal self-citation shareMedian: 2.5%2,489 journals
Retracted papers per 1,000Pooled rate: 3.276 per 1,0002,252 journals
Output growthMedian: -7.1%2,737 journals
Open access shareMedian: 99.1%3,016 journals
Listed APC (USD)Median including $0 listed prices: $3,2581,900 ranked journals with a known listed price, including $0 listed prices
International collaboration shareMedian: 25.1%2,917 journals
Review shareMedian: 0.3%3,016 journals
Articles-only OJRMedian: 0.792,965 journals
Uncited shareMedian: 26.6%3,016 journals
Citation concentrationMedian: 42.9%3,011 journals

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.