OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2007

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Domain ranking · 2007

Life Sciences journal rankings 2007

1,956 ranked journals · Domain

Life Sciences has 1,956 ranked journals in 2007. The median journal has an OJR of 0.81, below the world average of 1.00, up 0.03 on 2006; Q1 starts at OJR 1.38. The top three are Pharmacological Reviews, Cell, and Ecology Letters.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2007. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2004–2006, the window the 2007 score is computed on.

1,956
15% of all ranked journals
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.81+0.03 vs 2006
This domainAll 0.86World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

24%
All fields: 16%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,650
Median positive listed APC: $3,650 among 1,068 journals. Another 4 list $0; 884 have no known price. All fields: $3,550.

Fields in Life Sciences (5)

Up to All journals

1,956 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Life Sciences ranking, 2007

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2006. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2004–2006, the window the 2007 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2004–2006 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2007.

Compare
1Pharmacological ReviewsAmerican Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · United States
9.38Q122.29 1.09 up from 2006860%$4,500
2CellCell Press · United States
8.31Q121.58 1.55 down from 20061,49598%$11,400
3Ecology LettersWiley · United Kingdom
7.92Q111.06 1.43 up from 200642119%$5,300
4Briefings in BioinformaticsOAOxford University Press · United Kingdom
7.55Q14.97 12.71 down from 200613475%$3,885
5Nature GeneticsNature Portfolio · United States
7.54Q120.29 2.43 up from 200695630%$12,690
6NatureNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
6.53Q111.01 0.70 up from 20069,22418%$12,690
6.43Q119.70 5.06 up from 20066013%—
8The Plant CellOxford University Press · United States
6.34Q111.35 0.06 down from 200683699%$4,934
9Nature ImmunologyNature Portfolio · United States
5.75Q117.71 0.95 down from 200667619%$12,690
10Psychological ReviewAmerican Psychological Association · United States
5.40Q16.73 1.97 down from 200616813%—
11Progress in Lipid ResearchElsevier BV · United Kingdom
5.30Q111.83 1.06 up from 20065325%$5,530
12ImmunityCell Press · United States
5.15Q115.54 0.56 down from 2006530100%$10,400
13Nature NeuroscienceNature Portfolio · United States
5.05Q113.05 0.08 down from 200689935%$12,690
14Progress in NeurobiologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.97Q111.32 1.27 down from 200616622%$5,190
15FEMS Microbiology ReviewsOAOxford University Press · Netherlands
4.92Q18.86 1.20 up from 200615255%$3,297
16Cell MetabolismCell Press · United States
4.82Q112.24 0.18 up from 2006238100%$10,400
17The American Journal of Human GeneticsElsevier BV · United States
4.76Q110.52 1.29 down from 200684489%$5,150
18The Plant JournalWiley · United Kingdom
4.70Q18.74 0.33 up from 200696557%$5,450
19Sociologia RuralisWiley · Netherlands
4.65Q11.48 1.76 down from 20066643%$3,920
20The Journal of Experimental MedicineRockefeller University Press · United States
4.64Q114.12 0.01 up from 20061,15292%—
21Nature BiotechnologyNature Portfolio · United States
4.57Q18.66 0.31 down from 20061,16418%$12,690
22Systematic BiologyOxford University Press · United States
4.49Q17.57 3.64 down from 200625528%$2,166
23Nature Cell BiologyNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
4.46Q112.25 0.09 up from 200676926%$12,690
24Critical Reviews in BiotechnologyTaylor & Francis · United States
4.45Q16.17 1.72 up from 2006300%—
25NeuronCell Press · United States
4.44Q112.38 0.53 down from 20061,24499%$10,400
26Journal of Experimental Psychology GeneralAmerican Psychological Association
4.42Q16.28 0.95 down from 200612020%—
27ScienceAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science · United States
4.41Q16.26 0.05 up from 200614,39610%—
28Critical Reviews in Plant SciencesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
4.41Q16.39 1.29 up from 20067215%—
29Journal of Clinical InvestigationOAAmerican Society for Clinical Investigation · United States
4.40Q113.32 2.52 up from 20062,080100%$5,200
30Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNational Academy of Sciences · United States
4.40Q110.59 0.07 down from 200610,25399%—
31Journal of Rural StudiesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.23Q11.82 0.05 down from 200615516%$4,090
32Molecular CellElsevier BV · United States
4.22Q112.40 0.79 down from 20061,116100%$10,400
33Molecular Aspects of MedicineElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.11Q19.91 2.86 up from 20067610%$5,220
34PLANT PHYSIOLOGYOxford University Press · United States
3.98Q17.60 0.16 up from 20061,67299%$3,851
35Neuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsElsevier BV · United States
3.86Q19.06 0.35 down from 200625823%$4,860
36Molecular Plant-Microbe InteractionsOAAmerican Phytopathological Society · United States
3.78Q15.71 1.02 up from 200642047%$3,000
37The American NaturalistUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
3.77Q15.57 0.82 up from 20066838%—
38Critical Reviews in Food Science and NutritionTaylor & Francis · United States
3.77Q15.91 0.64 up from 20061180%—
39Pharmacology & TherapeuticsElsevier BV · United States
3.76Q18.49 0.70 up from 200633025%$5,660
40Molecular Systems BiologyOASpringer Nature · United Kingdom
3.67Q19.50 4.02 up from 2006102100%$7,990
41Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United States
3.62Q15.38 0.12 up from 200655618%$3,900
42ZoomorphologySpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
3.59Q15.63 3.91 up from 20065119%$3,890
43The EMBO JournalOASpringer Nature · Germany
3.59Q19.47 1.51 down from 20061,42695%$7,990
44New PhytologistWiley · United Kingdom
3.58Q15.64 0.73 up from 200696055%$5,790
45Biological PsychiatryElsevier BV · United States
3.56Q19.14 0.57 up from 20061,14232%$5,489
46The Quarterly Review of BiologyUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
3.56Q12.16 0.53 down from 2006751%—
3.53Q15.59 0.93 up from 20061,37599%—
48Circulation ResearchLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
3.53Q18.95 0.83 down from 20061,12452%—
49Molecular & Cellular ProteomicsOAElsevier BV · United States
3.51Q18.92 0.27 up from 200655999%$3,430
50PLoS BiologyOAPublic Library of Science · United States
3.50Q17.96 0.57 up from 20061,241100%$5,500

Citations made in 2007. Corpus-wide, 72.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

569 additional Life Sciences journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2004–2006, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2007. Publication window: 2004–2006. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
1,956
Window papers (baseline)
1,041,301 +21.8% from indicator year 2004
Median OJR
0.810 +14.7% from indicator year 2004
Rising journals (2025)
273

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2004–2006 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1,4161,5281,6151,7121,7311,8011,8651,9562,0042,0962,2222,3552,4842,5992,7052,8382,9232,9833,0273,0373,0153,0003,0303,0323,0143,016
Window papers (baseline)681,698747,894789,157838,563854,790911,302969,9831,041,3011,106,2851,194,9951,291,8161,389,1751,451,1511,495,4991,547,9781,608,2801,646,1561,651,7901,653,5661,677,6611,731,4631,821,7341,907,3161,955,1911,960,7792,008,547
Median OJR0.590.620.630.690.710.740.7780.8100.8130.8690.86750.900.910.8730.86780.830.81770.81800.809250.8060.8140.809310.800.7840.770.79
Category context (2025)
MeasureCategory statisticEligible population
Journal self-citation shareMedian: 2.5%2,489 journals
Retracted papers per 1,000Pooled rate: 3.276 per 1,0002,252 journals
Output growthMedian: -7.1%2,737 journals
Open access shareMedian: 99.1%3,016 journals
Listed APC (USD)Median including $0 listed prices: $3,2581,900 ranked journals with a known listed price, including $0 listed prices
International collaboration shareMedian: 25.1%2,917 journals
Review shareMedian: 0.3%3,016 journals
Articles-only OJRMedian: 0.792,965 journals
Uncited shareMedian: 26.6%3,016 journals
Citation concentrationMedian: 42.9%3,011 journals

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.