OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2017

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Domain ranking · 2017

Life Sciences journal rankings 2017

2,983 ranked journals · Domain

Life Sciences has 2,983 ranked journals in 2017. The median journal has an OJR of 0.82, below the world average of 1.00, unchanged on 2016; Q1 starts at OJR 1.37. The top three are Cell, Nature Genetics, and Pharmacological Reviews.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2017. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2014–2016, the window the 2017 score is computed on.

2,983
15% of all ranked journals
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.82
This domainAll 0.84World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

39%
All fields: 32%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,470
Median positive listed APC: $3,470 among 1,574 journals. Another 20 list $0; 1,389 have no known price. All fields: $3,350.

Fields in Life Sciences (5)

Up to All journals

2,983 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Life Sciences ranking, 2017

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2016. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2014–2016, the window the 2017 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2014–2016 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2008 to 2017.

Compare
1CellCell Press · United States
9.32Q124.31 0.22 up from 20162,029100%$11,400
2Nature GeneticsNature Portfolio · United States
9.26Q123.24 0.20 down from 201683566%$12,690
3Pharmacological ReviewsAmerican Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · United States
8.20Q120.93 1.07 up from 20168161%$4,500
4The Journal of Peasant StudiesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
7.54Q14.06 1.29 down from 201623728%—
5NatureNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
7.21Q114.01 0.96 up from 20169,42743%$12,690
6Ecology LettersWiley · United Kingdom
6.90Q110.27 1.08 down from 201643533%$5,300
7Nature NeuroscienceNature Portfolio · United States
6.53Q118.73 2.09 up from 201682266%$12,690
8FEMS Microbiology ReviewsOAOxford University Press · Netherlands
6.38Q113.75 0.86 down from 201613684%$3,297
9Journal of Extracellular VesiclesOATaylor & Francis · United States
6.31Q118.97 1.02 up from 2016113100%$4,410
10Nature BiotechnologyNature Portfolio · United States
6.29Q113.13 2.70 down from 20161,07933%$12,690
11Science AdvancesOAAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science · United States
6.28Q114.06 1.37 up from 2016773100%$4,500
12ImmunityCell Press · United States
6.21Q116.52 1.71 down from 201675995%$10,400
13Current Directions in Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
6.12Q17.37 1.22 down from 201621847%$3,900
14Nature Cell BiologyNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
6.01Q117.25 0.70 up from 201648462%$12,690
15Nature CommunicationsOANature Portfolio · United Kingdom
5.76Q114.42 0.07 up from 20169,562100%$6,990
16Cell MetabolismCell Press · United States
5.74Q116.47 1.70 up from 2016737100%$10,400
17Current Protocols in BioinformaticsWiley · United States
5.73Q113.49 2.93 up from 20166117%$5,050
18Studies in MycologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
5.67Q113.16 3.31 down from 201646100%$1,430
5.59Q19.78 1.12 up from 201617816%$5,000
20Cell stem cellElsevier BV · United States
5.52Q114.92 0.13 down from 201663099%$10,400
21Cell Host & MicrobeCell Press · United States
5.51Q113.67 1.31 up from 2016597100%$10,400
22Genome biologyOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
5.33Q114.06 1.69 up from 2016880100%$5,490
23Biotechnology AdvancesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
5.28Q113.24 1.11 up from 201632526%$5,460
24MicrobiomeOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
5.25Q111.85 0.63 up from 2016181100%$4,990
25Nature ProtocolsNature Portfolio · United States
4.98Q114.04 1.77 up from 201650148%—
26Progress in NeurobiologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.93Q113.77 0.33 up from 201616139%$5,190
27Nature MicrobiologyNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
4.92Q110.08no 2016 value26462%$12,690—
28Fungal DiversitySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
4.92Q115.21 1.30 up from 20169920%$3,490
29Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United States
4.79Q17.72 0.67 up from 201660145%$3,900
30Journal of Clinical InvestigationOAAmerican Society for Clinical Investigation · United States
4.75Q112.62 0.28 up from 20161,426100%$5,200
31Trends in Food Science & TechnologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.74Q18.60 1.09 up from 201640221%$5,440
32NeuronCell Press · United States
4.73Q112.66 0.57 down from 20161,591100%$10,400
33Nature ImmunologyNature Portfolio · United States
4.68Q113.48 0.95 up from 201676242%$12,690
34Critical Reviews in Plant SciencesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
4.67Q14.16 4.82 down from 20166030%—
35Circulation ResearchLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
4.62Q112.27 0.45 up from 20161,00144%—
36Drug Resistance UpdatesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.48Q113.04 0.96 up from 20166638%$5,410
37Molecular CellElsevier BV · United States
4.43Q113.30 1.01 down from 20161,18999%$10,400
38ACS Central ScienceOAAmerican Chemical Society · United States
4.39Q111.02 3.33 up from 2016177100%$0 listed
39Journal of Rural StudiesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.37Q13.59 0.09 up from 201639047%$4,090
40ScienceAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science · United States
4.31Q17.66 0.22 down from 201614,12719%—
41Frontiers in NeuroendocrinologyElsevier BV · United States
4.31Q17.26 4.21 down from 20169437%$4,800
42Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNational Academy of Sciences · United States
4.27Q19.85 0.28 down from 201611,57199%—
43Nature MethodsNature Portfolio · United States
4.26Q110.54 0.28 down from 20161,27737%$12,690
44Microbial Ecology in Health and DiseaseTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
4.26Q110.84 2.07 up from 201655100%$1,725
45Agronomy for Sustainable DevelopmentSpringer Science+Business Media · France
4.22Q15.84 0.53 up from 201620397%$2,990
46Science Translational MedicineAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science · United States
4.21Q110.02 0.15 up from 20161,43940%—
47SOILOACopernicus Publications · Germany
4.12Q16.34 4.52 down from 2016100100%$1,110
48Psychological ReviewAmerican Psychological Association · United States
4.06Q17.20 0.55 down from 201610859%—
49The Plant CellOxford University Press · United States
4.03Q18.00 0.46 down from 2016853100%$4,934
50New PhytologistWiley · United Kingdom
3.98Q17.17 0.12 down from 20161,62266%$5,790

Citations made in 2017. Corpus-wide, 77.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

959 additional Life Sciences journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2014–2016, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2017. Publication window: 2014–2016. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
2,983
Window papers (baseline)
1,651,790 +6.7% from indicator year 2014
Median OJR
0.8180 -5.7% from indicator year 2014
Rising journals (2025)
273

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2014–2016 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1,4161,5281,6151,7121,7311,8011,8651,9562,0042,0962,2222,3552,4842,5992,7052,8382,9232,9833,0273,0373,0153,0003,0303,0323,0143,016
Window papers (baseline)681,698747,894789,157838,563854,790911,302969,9831,041,3011,106,2851,194,9951,291,8161,389,1751,451,1511,495,4991,547,9781,608,2801,646,1561,651,7901,653,5661,677,6611,731,4631,821,7341,907,3161,955,1911,960,7792,008,547
Median OJR0.590.620.630.690.710.740.7780.8100.8130.8690.86750.900.910.8730.86780.830.81770.81800.809250.8060.8140.809310.800.7840.770.79
Category context (2025)
MeasureCategory statisticEligible population
Journal self-citation shareMedian: 2.5%2,489 journals
Retracted papers per 1,000Pooled rate: 3.276 per 1,0002,252 journals
Output growthMedian: -7.1%2,737 journals
Open access shareMedian: 99.1%3,016 journals
Listed APC (USD)Median including $0 listed prices: $3,2581,900 ranked journals with a known listed price, including $0 listed prices
International collaboration shareMedian: 25.1%2,917 journals
Review shareMedian: 0.3%3,016 journals
Articles-only OJRMedian: 0.792,965 journals
Uncited shareMedian: 26.6%3,016 journals
Citation concentrationMedian: 42.9%3,011 journals

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.