OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2010

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Domain ranking · 2010

Life Sciences journal rankings 2010

2,222 ranked journals · Domain

Life Sciences has 2,222 ranked journals in 2010. The median journal has an OJR of 0.87, below the world average of 1.00, unchanged on 2009; Q1 starts at OJR 1.49. The top three are Nature Genetics, Ecology Letters, and Cell.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2010. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2007–2009, the window the 2010 score is computed on.

2,222
15% of all ranked journals
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.87
This domainAll 0.93World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

28%
All fields: 20%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,590
Median positive listed APC: $3,590 among 1,228 journals. Another 8 list $0; 986 have no known price. All fields: $3,490.

Fields in Life Sciences (5)

Up to All journals

2,222 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Life Sciences ranking, 2010

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2009. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2007–2009, the window the 2010 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2007–2009 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2001 to 2010.

Compare
1Nature GeneticsNature Portfolio · United States
11.32Q131.40 4.60 up from 200992058%$12,690
2Ecology LettersWiley · United Kingdom
9.48Q112.73 0.13 down from 200939820%$5,300
3CellCell Press · United States
9.11Q123.30 1.04 up from 20091,78699%$11,400
4Pharmacological ReviewsAmerican Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · United States
8.92Q122.35 3.32 up from 20095455%$4,500
5NatureNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
6.79Q111.40 0.41 up from 20099,87627%$12,690
6Frontiers in NeuroendocrinologyElsevier BV · United States
6.31Q112.95 1.99 down from 20099358%$4,800
7Cell stem cellElsevier BV · United States
6.25Q117.06 2.20 up from 2009475100%$10,400
8Nature ImmunologyNature Portfolio · United States
6.19Q118.20 1.01 up from 200968256%$12,690
9ImmunityCell Press · United States
6.18Q119.60 2.21 up from 2009626100%$10,400
10Biotechnology AdvancesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
6.10Q19.59 0.78 down from 200921414%$5,460
11FEMS Microbiology ReviewsOAOxford University Press · Netherlands
5.82Q113.07 2.01 up from 200915466%$3,297
12Sociologia RuralisWiley · Netherlands
5.68Q13.12 0.60 up from 20098013%$3,920
13Journal of Clinical InvestigationOAAmerican Society for Clinical Investigation · United States
5.59Q113.19 0.43 down from 20091,397100%$5,200
14Nature Cell BiologyNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
5.49Q114.10 0.02 up from 200973150%$12,690
15Cell MetabolismCell Press · United States
5.44Q114.75 0.65 up from 2009401100%$10,400
16The Plant CellOxford University Press · United States
5.26Q19.56 0.42 down from 200993298%$4,934
17ScienceAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science · United States
5.26Q17.40 0.47 up from 200913,56423%—
18Nature BiotechnologyNature Portfolio · United States
5.24Q110.30 0.20 down from 20091,08728%$12,690
19Psychological ReviewAmerican Psychological Association · United States
5.22Q18.77 0.25 up from 200917132%—
20Nature NeuroscienceNature Portfolio · United States
5.01Q112.71 0.22 up from 200983668%$12,690
21Systematic BiologyOxford University Press · United States
4.97Q19.11 0.89 down from 200926142%$2,166
22Molecular CellElsevier BV · United States
4.91Q113.39 0.95 down from 20091,097100%$10,400
23Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNational Academy of Sciences · United States
4.79Q111.03 0.23 up from 200911,80299%—
24The American Journal of Human GeneticsElsevier BV · United States
4.77Q111.29 0.32 down from 200973795%$5,150
25Progress in Lipid ResearchElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.75Q110.69 1.09 up from 20097436%$5,530
26PLoS BiologyOAPublic Library of Science · United States
4.74Q110.36 0.67 down from 2009893100%$5,500
27Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United States
4.59Q16.63 0.32 down from 200971032%$3,900
28Molecular Biology and EvolutionOAOxford University Press · United States
4.58Q15.99 5.70 down from 200987978%$3,418
4.56Q13.94 2.90 down from 20097143%$3,570
30Current Directions in Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
4.56Q16.05 0.25 down from 200922129%$3,900
31Molecular Aspects of MedicineElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.55Q114.55 6.44 up from 200911037%$5,220
32NeuronCell Press · United States
4.53Q112.65 1.05 up from 20091,21799%$10,400
33Drug Resistance UpdatesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.49Q111.12 0.43 down from 20096220%$5,410
34The Journal of Experimental MedicineRockefeller University Press · United States
4.49Q112.31 0.30 down from 20091,11387%—
35The Plant JournalWiley · United Kingdom
4.43Q17.83 0.18 down from 20091,12259%$5,450
36Molecular Systems BiologyOASpringer Nature · United Kingdom
4.42Q110.66 1.94 down from 2009261100%$7,990
37Pharmacology & TherapeuticsElsevier BV · United States
4.40Q19.28 0.60 down from 200929828%$5,660
38Progress in NeurobiologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.36Q111.13 0.05 up from 200920724%$5,190
39PLoS GeneticsOAPublic Library of Science · United States
4.34Q110.87 0.16 down from 20091,062100%$3,043
40Critical Reviews in Plant SciencesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
4.29Q16.05 1.22 down from 20095216%—
4.23Q1—no 2009 value43——
42Journal of Rural StudiesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.20Q12.64 0.07 up from 200914816%$4,090
43Cell Host & MicrobeCell Press · United States
4.18Q110.77 1.46 up from 2009377100%$10,400
44Orphanet Journal of Rare DiseasesOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
4.09Q18.03 0.26 up from 2009112100%$2,990
45Trends in Food Science & TechnologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.07Q13.86 0.08 down from 200925913%$5,440
46New PhytologistWiley · United Kingdom
4.05Q16.51 0.36 up from 20091,15558%$5,790
47PLANT PHYSIOLOGYOxford University Press · United States
4.04Q17.46 0.43 up from 20091,608100%$3,851
48Briefings in BioinformaticsOAOxford University Press · United Kingdom
4.00Q112.12 4.14 up from 200916079%$3,885
49Nature ProtocolsNature Portfolio · United States
3.99Q110.82 2.79 up from 200973737%—
50Critical Reviews in Food Science and NutritionTaylor & Francis · United States
3.97Q16.63 1.69 up from 200914021%—

Citations made in 2010. Corpus-wide, 73.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

697 additional Life Sciences journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2007–2009, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2010. Publication window: 2007–2009. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
2,222
Window papers (baseline)
1,291,816 +24.1% from indicator year 2007
Median OJR
0.8675 +7.2% from indicator year 2007
Rising journals (2025)
273

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2007–2009 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1,4161,5281,6151,7121,7311,8011,8651,9562,0042,0962,2222,3552,4842,5992,7052,8382,9232,9833,0273,0373,0153,0003,0303,0323,0143,016
Window papers (baseline)681,698747,894789,157838,563854,790911,302969,9831,041,3011,106,2851,194,9951,291,8161,389,1751,451,1511,495,4991,547,9781,608,2801,646,1561,651,7901,653,5661,677,6611,731,4631,821,7341,907,3161,955,1911,960,7792,008,547
Median OJR0.590.620.630.690.710.740.7780.8100.8130.8690.86750.900.910.8730.86780.830.81770.81800.809250.8060.8140.809310.800.7840.770.79
Category context (2025)
MeasureCategory statisticEligible population
Journal self-citation shareMedian: 2.5%2,489 journals
Retracted papers per 1,000Pooled rate: 3.276 per 1,0002,252 journals
Output growthMedian: -7.1%2,737 journals
Open access shareMedian: 99.1%3,016 journals
Listed APC (USD)Median including $0 listed prices: $3,2581,900 ranked journals with a known listed price, including $0 listed prices
International collaboration shareMedian: 25.1%2,917 journals
Review shareMedian: 0.3%3,016 journals
Articles-only OJRMedian: 0.792,965 journals
Uncited shareMedian: 26.6%3,016 journals
Citation concentrationMedian: 42.9%3,011 journals

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.