OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2018

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Domain ranking · 2018

Life Sciences journal rankings 2018

3,027 ranked journals · Domain

Life Sciences has 3,027 ranked journals in 2018. The median journal has an OJR of 0.81, below the world average of 1.00, down 0.01 on 2017; Q1 starts at OJR 1.35. The top three are Cell, Nature Genetics, and The Journal of Peasant Studies.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2018. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2015–2017, the window the 2018 score is computed on.

3,027
14% of all ranked journals
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.81-0.01 vs 2017
This domainAll 0.83World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

40%
All fields: 33%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,470
Median positive listed APC: $3,470 among 1,607 journals. Another 21 list $0; 1,399 have no known price. All fields: $3,330.

Fields in Life Sciences (5)

Up to All journals

3,027 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Life Sciences ranking, 2018

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2017. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2015–2017, the window the 2018 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2015–2017 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2009 to 2018.

Compare
1CellCell Press · United States
9.81Q128.47 4.16 up from 20171,917100%$11,400
2Nature GeneticsNature Portfolio · United States
9.20Q122.22 1.01 down from 201781277%$12,690
3The Journal of Peasant StudiesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
7.90Q14.56 0.50 up from 201726628%—
4Pharmacological ReviewsAmerican Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · United States
7.79Q120.58 0.35 down from 20177369%$4,500
5NatureNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
7.29Q114.69 0.68 up from 20179,15053%$12,690
6Nature NeuroscienceNature Portfolio · United States
7.18Q118.87 0.13 up from 201776971%$12,690
7Nature Human BehaviourNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
6.66Q17.63 0.15 down from 201724636%$12,690
8Inflammatory Intestinal DiseasesOAKarger Publishers · Switzerland
6.38Q113.07 10.54 down from 201745100%$990
9Science AdvancesOAAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science · United States
6.29Q115.02 0.96 up from 20171,530100%$4,500
10Cell MetabolismCell Press · United States
6.24Q117.68 1.20 up from 2017734100%$10,400
11Ecology LettersWiley · United Kingdom
6.20Q19.88 0.40 down from 201745247%$5,300
12FEMS Microbiology ReviewsOAOxford University Press · Netherlands
6.13Q112.39 1.37 down from 201716089%$3,297
13Nature Ecology & EvolutionNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
5.76Q19.80 0.64 up from 201738452%$12,690
14ImmunityCell Press · United States
5.57Q116.75 0.23 up from 2017769100%$10,400
15Nature Cell BiologyNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
5.56Q113.76 3.50 down from 201752054%$12,690
5.55Q19.93 0.16 up from 201717829%$5,000
17Fungal DiversitySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
5.50Q115.86 0.64 up from 20177029%$3,490
18Nature BiotechnologyNature Portfolio · United States
5.31Q111.66 1.47 down from 20171,03534%$12,690
19Nature CommunicationsOANature Portfolio · United Kingdom
5.30Q113.84 0.58 down from 201711,182100%$6,990
20Nature ProtocolsNature Portfolio · United States
5.24Q113.22 0.81 down from 201745058%—
21Trends in Food Science & TechnologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
5.20Q19.50 0.89 up from 201755324%$5,440
22Nature MicrobiologyNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
5.13Q112.29 2.21 up from 201746965%$12,690
23Biotechnology AdvancesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
5.13Q111.33 1.91 down from 201734335%$5,460
24Current Protocols in BioinformaticsWiley · United States
5.10Q119.38 5.89 up from 20176137%$5,050
25Journal of Extracellular VesiclesOATaylor & Francis · United States
5.08Q112.15 6.82 down from 2017118100%$4,410
26Cell Host & MicrobeCell Press · United States
5.05Q111.88 1.79 down from 2017606100%$10,400
27Genome biologyOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
4.93Q114.47 0.41 up from 2017751100%$5,490
28MicrobiomeOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
4.93Q113.39 1.54 up from 2017294100%$4,990
29Microbial Ecology in Health and DiseaseTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
4.77Q14.77 6.08 down from 201761100%$1,725
30Journal of Rural StudiesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.74Q14.33 0.74 up from 201748944%$4,090
31Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United States
4.72Q16.16 1.56 down from 201758641%$3,900
32Cell stem cellElsevier BV · United States
4.71Q113.38 1.54 down from 2017612100%$10,400
33Current Directions in Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
4.70Q16.76 0.62 down from 201723850%$3,900
34Molecular Biology and EvolutionOAOxford University Press · United States
4.66Q113.65 4.57 up from 201799986%$3,418
35NeuronCell Press · United States
4.63Q112.29 0.37 down from 20171,57499%$10,400
36Progress in NeurobiologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.59Q110.54 3.23 down from 201717543%$5,190
37Bone ResearchOASpringer Nature · China
4.59Q112.09 1.28 up from 201778100%$3,405
38Psychological ReviewAmerican Psychological Association · United States
4.54Q18.21 1.01 up from 201711847%—
39Journal of Pineal ResearchWiley · Denmark
4.53Q116.00 3.20 up from 201723620%$5,000
40Nature MethodsNature Portfolio · United States
4.51Q112.39 1.85 up from 20171,23139%$12,690
41Circulation ResearchLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
4.50Q111.90 0.38 down from 201796043%—
42Nature ImmunologyNature Portfolio · United States
4.50Q112.50 0.98 down from 201775343%$12,690
43Journal of Clinical InvestigationOAAmerican Society for Clinical Investigation · United States
4.47Q111.73 0.89 down from 20171,294100%$5,200
44Drug Resistance UpdatesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.43Q113.69 0.65 up from 20176717%$5,410
45ACS Central ScienceOAAmerican Chemical Society · United States
4.42Q113.32 2.30 up from 2017330100%$0 listed
46Progress in Lipid ResearchElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.38Q18.66 1.64 up from 201712629%$5,530
47Studies in MycologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
4.36Q18.84 4.32 down from 201753100%$1,430
48Journal of Agrarian ChangeWiley · United Kingdom
4.29Q12.73 0.52 up from 201711522%$3,820
49Molecular CellElsevier BV · United States
4.21Q113.32 0.02 up from 20171,194100%$10,400
50Food and Energy SecurityOAWiley · United Kingdom
4.14Q15.54 0.98 up from 201755100%$4,190

Citations made in 2018. Corpus-wide, 81.5% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

902 additional Life Sciences journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2015–2017, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2018. Publication window: 2015–2017. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
3,027
Window papers (baseline)
1,653,566 +2.8% from indicator year 2015
Median OJR
0.80925 -2.6% from indicator year 2015
Rising journals (2025)
273

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2015–2017 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1,4161,5281,6151,7121,7311,8011,8651,9562,0042,0962,2222,3552,4842,5992,7052,8382,9232,9833,0273,0373,0153,0003,0303,0323,0143,016
Window papers (baseline)681,698747,894789,157838,563854,790911,302969,9831,041,3011,106,2851,194,9951,291,8161,389,1751,451,1511,495,4991,547,9781,608,2801,646,1561,651,7901,653,5661,677,6611,731,4631,821,7341,907,3161,955,1911,960,7792,008,547
Median OJR0.590.620.630.690.710.740.7780.8100.8130.8690.86750.900.910.8730.86780.830.81770.81800.809250.8060.8140.809310.800.7840.770.79
Category context (2025)
MeasureCategory statisticEligible population
Journal self-citation shareMedian: 2.5%2,489 journals
Retracted papers per 1,000Pooled rate: 3.276 per 1,0002,252 journals
Output growthMedian: -7.1%2,737 journals
Open access shareMedian: 99.1%3,016 journals
Listed APC (USD)Median including $0 listed prices: $3,2581,900 ranked journals with a known listed price, including $0 listed prices
International collaboration shareMedian: 25.1%2,917 journals
Review shareMedian: 0.3%3,016 journals
Articles-only OJRMedian: 0.792,965 journals
Uncited shareMedian: 26.6%3,016 journals
Citation concentrationMedian: 42.9%3,011 journals

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.