OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2001

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2001

Nutrition and Dietetics journal rankings 2001

24 ranked journals · Subfield in Nursing

Nutrition and Dietetics has 24 ranked journals in 2001. The median OJR rose 0.07 on 2000 to 0.66, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.14. The top three are American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition Research Reviews, and Journal of Nutrition.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2001. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 score is computed on.

24
80% of Nursing
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.66+0.07 vs 2000
This subfieldAll 0.68World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

8%
All fields: 12%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$4,010
Median positive listed APC: $4,010 among 14 journals. 10 have no known price. All fields: $3,560.

Subfields of Nursing (4)

24 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Nutrition and Dietetics ranking, 2001

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2000. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 1998–2000 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2001.

Compare
1American Journal of Clinical NutritionElsevier BV · United States
2.75Q15.19 0.35 up from 20001,30699%$5,200
2Nutrition Research ReviewsCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
2.22Q13.41 1.16 up from 20004038%$3,550
3Journal of NutritionElsevier BV · United States
1.82Q13.62 0.41 up from 20001,32599%$5,200
1.20Q12.11 0.05 up from 20002468%$4,110
5Journal of the American College of NutritionTaylor & Francis · United States
1.19Q12.11 0.51 up from 20002604%—
6LipidsWiley · United States
1.14Q12.36 0.38 up from 20005713%$3,589
7Journal of Cereal ScienceElsevier BV · United States
1.11Q21.52 0.22 up from 20001030%$3,930
8BioMetalsSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
0.96Q21.24 0.32 down from 20001423%$4,090
0.75Q21.75 0.51 up from 20003141%$3,790
0.74Q20.93 0.41 up from 2000882%—
11Cereal ChemistryWiley · United States
0.74Q21.16 0.06 down from 20004764%$3,750
0.67Q20.85 0.02 up from 20001033%$3,700
13Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic CareLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.65Q31.52 0.37 up from 20002512%—
0.61Q31.14 0.20 up from 20001070%—
15Cereal Foods WorldAmerican Association of Cereal Chemists · United States
0.61Q30.69 0.20 up from 20001080%—
16Starch - StärkeWiley · Germany
0.58Q30.74 0.41 up from 2000411%$4,260
17Biological Trace Element ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.56Q30.70 0.26 down from 20004666%$4,290
18Annals of Nutrition and MetabolismKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.54Q31.01 0.24 up from 200012820%—
0.38Q40.64 0.03 up from 200016848%$4,150
20Ecology of Food and NutritionTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.29Q40.27 0.26 down from 2000864%—
21Journal of Applied GlycoscienceOAJapanese Society of Applied Glycoscience · Japan
0.22Q40.43 0.17 up from 200013689%—
22Nutrition & Food ScienceEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
0.22Q40.13 0.02 down from 20004140%—
0.21Q40.49 0.07 up from 20001086%—
24Nutrition in Clinical PracticeWiley · United States
0.20Q40.31 0.12 down from 20001885%$3,570

Citations made in 2001. Corpus-wide, 67.0% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

6 additional Nutrition and Dietetics journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1998–2000, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2001. Publication window: 1998–2000. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
24
Window papers (baseline)
18,730 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Median OJR
0.66 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1998–2000 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2424242424242425272831343438414647525555595558605651
Window papers (baseline)16,95118,73019,52720,90421,28323,09424,62526,54128,39030,81934,79037,78040,07140,63143,27645,96648,18748,91150,09152,39655,33859,78563,14664,70364,17967,159
Median OJR0.590.660.690.730.810.800.910.9970.971.011.161.131.211.181.081.0011.030.960.9380.9200.9430.9980.9400.930.880.917

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.