OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2001

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2001

Occupational Therapy journal rankings 2001

17 ranked journals · Subfield in Health Professions

Occupational Therapy has 17 ranked journals in 2001. The median OJR fell 0.06 on 2000 to 0.48, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 0.69. The top three are Augmentative and Alternative Communication, American Journal of Occupational Therapy, and Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2001. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 score is computed on.

17
6% of Health Professions
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.48-0.06 vs 2000
This subfieldAll 0.68World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

18%
All fields: 12%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,810
Median positive listed APC: $3,810 among 6 journals. 11 have no known price. All fields: $3,560.

Subfields of Health Professions (11)

17 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Occupational Therapy ranking, 2001

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2000. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 1998–2000 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2001.

Compare
1Augmentative and Alternative CommunicationTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.21Q11.11 0.66 up from 2000682%—
2American Journal of Occupational TherapyAmerican Occupational Therapy Association · United States
1.01Q10.67 0.33 down from 20003731%—
0.99Q10.66 0.28 down from 20001025%$4,150
4The Occupational Therapy Journal of ResearchSAGE Publishing · United States
0.69Q10.56 0.03 up from 2000565%—
5Assistive TechnologyTaylor & Francis · United States
0.69Q10.50 0.07 up from 2000420%—
6Journal of Tissue ViabilityElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.68Q20.71 0.10 up from 2000690%$2,790
7Journal of Occupational ScienceTaylor & Francis · Australia
0.62Q20.56 0.25 down from 2000420%—
8Occupational Therapy InternationalOAHindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom
0.58Q20.26 0.25 down from 20006238%$1,630
0.48Q20.71 0.15 up from 2000513%$3,470
10British Journal of Occupational TherapySAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.46Q30.61 0.14 down from 20002787%$4,150
11Military MedicineOxford University Press · United Kingdom
0.44Q30.55 0.03 down from 200016322%$4,748
0.39Q30.49 0.10 up from 2000612%—
13Physiotherapy Theory and PracticeTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.31Q30.44 0.11 down from 2000670%—
14Occupational Therapy in Mental HealthTaylor & Francis · United States
0.19Q40.21 0.16 down from 2000430%—
15British Journal of Therapy and RehabilitationMark Allen Group · United Kingdom
0.14Q40.19 0.12 down from 20002680%—
16Occupational Therapy In Health CareTaylor & Francis · United States
0.07Q40.07 0.08 down from 2000430%—
17The AnthropologistOAKamla Raj Enterprises · India
0.05Q40.04 0.04 up from 2000750%—

Citations made in 2001. Corpus-wide, 67.0% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

4 additional Occupational Therapy journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1998–2000, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2001. Publication window: 1998–2000. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
17
Window papers (baseline)
3,403 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Median OJR
0.48 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Rising journals (2025)
5

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1998–2000 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1617192019201919201922222222222323242426292727272525
Window papers (baseline)3,1703,4033,5953,8524,0174,4454,8045,3485,8606,4316,9017,4527,8988,8099,71411,19612,45613,84815,14616,65818,37820,57222,58624,17326,33529,176
Median OJR0.540.480.660.510.600.530.630.640.7370.7360.8370.860.870.911.020.920.880.8400.8120.8100.7350.7260.770.650.760.75

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.