OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2006

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2006

Cancer Research journal rankings 2006

20 ranked journals · Subfield in Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Cancer Research has 20 ranked journals in 2006. The median OJR rose 0.10 on 2005 to 0.67, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 0.99. The top three are Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, and Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2006. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2003–2005, the window the 2006 score is computed on.

20
2% of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.67+0.10 vs 2005
This subfieldAll 0.84World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

25%
All fields: 15%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,350
Median positive listed APC: $3,350 among 13 journals. 7 have no known price. All fields: $3,550.

Subfields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (14)

20 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Cancer Research ranking, 2006

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2005. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2003–2005, the window the 2006 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2003–2005 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2006.

Compare
2.35Q17.27 1.69 up from 20051180%$4,160
2Journal of Molecular DiagnosticsElsevier BV · United States
1.43Q13.39 0.16 up from 200517398%$3,000
3Breast Cancer Research and TreatmentSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.27Q13.59 0.02 down from 20057137%$4,190
1.00Q12.65 0.22 up from 2005835%—
0.99Q12.32 0.20 up from 20055235%$3,350
6MutagenesisOxford University Press · United Kingdom
0.97Q22.67 0.49 up from 200520029%$4,170
7Clinical Breast CancerElsevier BV · United States
0.92Q22.41no change2183%$3,470
0.92Q22.66 0.56 up from 20052629%$3,750
9The BreastOAElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.75Q21.46 0.31 down from 20054071%$3,200
10The Breast JournalOAWiley · United Kingdom
0.71Q21.72 0.18 up from 200535760%$2,350
11Breast DiseaseIOS Press · Netherlands
0.64Q31.80 1.20 up from 20054213%—
12Breast CancerSpringer Science+Business Media · Japan
0.51Q31.35 0.11 up from 20051897%$3,890
13Pathology - Research and PracticeElsevier BV · Germany
0.50Q31.18 0.17 up from 20053476%$2,780
14British Journal of Biomedical ScienceOATaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.34Q30.71 0.14 down from 2005442%$2,506
15The Women s Oncology ReviewTaylor & Francis · United States
0.25Q30.59 0.03 up from 20052760%—
16Breast Diseases A Year Book QuarterlyElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.11Q40.24 0.48 down from 20052500%—
17Seminars in Breast DiseaseElsevier BV · United States
0.09Q40.15 0.01 down from 2005580%—
18Environmental Mutagen ResearchPublisher not listed
0.05Q40.14 0.01 up from 2005104——
0.02Q40.23 0.22 up from 2005135100%$500
20International Journal of Human GeneticsOAKamla Raj Enterprises · India
0.01Q40.11 0.01 down from 20052261%—

Citations made in 2006. Corpus-wide, 71.3% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

5 additional Cancer Research journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2003–2005, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2006. Publication window: 2003–2005. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
20
Window papers (baseline)
22,718 +28.0% from indicator year 2003
Median OJR
0.67 +12.7% from indicator year 2003
Rising journals (2025)
2

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2003–2005 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1214151616192021212221202124232526272827292727262729
Window papers (baseline)14,24715,31216,61517,74518,77420,52922,71825,25927,53530,13532,91435,94038,83941,42444,72247,64050,01951,18252,32854,53057,57661,69864,50864,64660,80656,699
Median OJR0.490.500.460.600.710.580.670.6800.7680.81390.720.7980.930.920.880.840.79690.81430.8040.820.760.6790.700.790.7700.7966

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.