OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2008

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2008

Music journal rankings 2008

20 ranked journals · Subfield in Arts and Humanities

Music has 20 ranked journals in 2008. The median journal has an OJR of 0.35, below the world average of 1.00, down 0.04 on 2007; Q1 starts at OJR 1.07. The top three are Arts Education Policy Review, International Journal of Music Education, and Journal of Research in Music Education.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2008. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2005–2007, the window the 2008 score is computed on.

20
6% of Arts and Humanities
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.35-0.04 vs 2007
This subfieldAll 0.89World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

15%
All fields: 17%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,550
Median positive listed APC: $3,550 among 7 journals. 13 have no known price. All fields: $3,540.

Subfields of Arts and Humanities (13)

20 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Music ranking, 2008

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2007. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2005–2007, the window the 2008 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2005–2007 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2008.

Compare
1Arts Education Policy ReviewTaylor & Francis · United States
1.71Q10.42 0.01 up from 2007810%—
2International Journal of Music EducationSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.69Q10.71 0.46 up from 20077410%$3,650
3Journal of Research in Music EducationSAGE Publishing · United States
1.22Q10.48 0.08 up from 200714011%$3,650
4Music Education ResearchTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.09Q10.46 0.45 down from 20077411%—
5British Journal of Music EducationCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
1.07Q10.93 0.20 up from 20077718%$3,550
6Research Studies in Music EducationSAGE Publishing · Australia
0.90Q20.68 0.32 up from 2007346%$3,650
0.87Q20.23 0.05 down from 2007370%$3,400
8Journal of Music Teacher EducationSAGE Publishing · United States
0.79Q20.24 0.20 down from 20075011%$3,400
9Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music EducationUniversity of Illinois Press · United States
0.52Q20.23 0.05 down from 2007600%—
10Philosophy of Music Education ReviewIndiana University Press · United States
0.43Q20.12 0.04 down from 20071050%—
11Empirical Musicology ReviewOAThe Ohio State University Libraries · United States
0.27Q30.45 0.02 down from 200740100%—
12Yearbook for Traditional MusicCambridge University Press · United States
0.25Q30.05 0.01 up from 20071173%$3,450
13Music Theory OnlineOASociety for Music Theory · United States
0.23Q30.25 0.17 up from 200770100%—
14The American Journal of SemioticsPhilosophy Documentation Center · United States
0.17Q30.13 0.11 up from 2007704%—
15Perspectives of New MusicPerspectives of New Music · United States
0.12Q30.06 0.04 down from 2007810%—
16Journal of Music TheoryDuke University · United States
0.12Q40.04 0.14 down from 2007575%—
17Fontes artis musicaeUnited States
0.07Q40.00no change730%—
18Music Reference Services QuarterlyTaylor & Francis · United States
0.05Q40.00 0.02 down from 200757——
19Voice and Speech ReviewTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.00Q40.00 0.05 down from 2007117——
0.00Q40.00no change4669%—

Citations made in 2008. Corpus-wide, 71.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

5 additional Music journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2005–2007, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2008. Publication window: 2005–2007. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
20
Window papers (baseline)
11,836 +25.3% from indicator year 2005
Median OJR
0.3493 -39.0% from indicator year 2005
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2005–2007 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1316151515151719202021222425252526282931323233333130
Window papers (baseline)7,3407,3267,7188,1468,6799,44410,19211,15911,83612,67613,35913,89414,27114,48514,78415,47316,14216,18115,69415,44015,54815,95316,50517,74518,17018,914
Median OJR0.6160.270.730.440.580.5730.34940.390.34930.500.56140.760.600.680.6240.650.700.540.5680.6260.610.5660.490.56090.420.629

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.