OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2009

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Field ranking · 2009

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology journal rankings 2009

951 ranked journals · Field in Life Sciences

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology has 951 ranked journals in 2009. The median journal has an OJR of 0.95, below the world average of 1.00, up 0.03 on 2008; Q1 starts at OJR 1.49. The top three are Nature Genetics, Pharmacological Reviews, and Cell.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2009. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2006–2008, the window the 2009 score is computed on.

951
45% of Life Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.95+0.03 vs 2008
This fieldAll 0.92World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

25%
All fields: 18%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,750
Median positive listed APC: $3,750 among 575 journals. Another 4 list $0; 372 have no known price. All fields: $3,510.

Subfields in Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (14)

Up to Life Sciences

951 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ranking, 2009

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2008. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2006–2008, the window the 2009 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2006–2008 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2009.

Compare
1Nature GeneticsNature Portfolio · United States
10.20Q126.81 2.65 up from 200897162%$12,690
2Pharmacological ReviewsAmerican Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · United States
9.58Q119.03 4.69 down from 20087133%$4,500
3CellCell Press · United States
8.90Q122.26 0.06 down from 20081,78498%$11,400
8.57Q122.55 2.20 up from 200840——
5NatureNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
6.80Q110.99 0.45 up from 20089,77126%$12,690
6Journal of Clinical InvestigationOAAmerican Society for Clinical Investigation · United States
5.85Q113.62 0.92 down from 20081,39799%$5,200
7Cell stem cellElsevier BV · United States
5.68Q114.86 3.88 up from 2008289100%$10,400
8Cell MetabolismCell Press · United States
5.41Q114.10 1.30 up from 2008392100%$10,400
9Biotechnology AdvancesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
5.36Q110.37 3.22 up from 200814710%$5,460
10Nature Cell BiologyNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
5.26Q114.08 1.40 up from 200871149%$12,690
11FEMS Microbiology ReviewsOAOxford University Press · Netherlands
5.25Q111.05 1.32 up from 200814968%$3,297
12Progress in Lipid ResearchElsevier BV · United Kingdom
5.23Q19.60 3.09 down from 20086812%$5,530
13ScienceAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science · United States
5.01Q16.94 0.27 up from 200813,88820%—
14Nature BiotechnologyNature Portfolio · United States
5.00Q110.51 1.56 up from 20081,13428%$12,690
15Molecular CellElsevier BV · United States
4.83Q114.35 1.76 up from 20081,09599%$10,400
16Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNational Academy of Sciences · United States
4.70Q110.80 0.09 up from 200811,119100%—
17Molecular Systems BiologyOASpringer Nature · United Kingdom
4.68Q112.61 0.82 up from 2008231100%$7,990
18Systematic BiologyOxford University Press · United States
4.67Q19.99 2.95 up from 200826932%$2,166
19The American Journal of Human GeneticsElsevier BV · United States
4.54Q111.61 1.31 up from 200880698%$5,150
20PLoS BiologyOAPublic Library of Science · United States
4.39Q111.03 1.67 up from 20081,036100%$5,500
21PLoS GeneticsOAPublic Library of Science · United States
4.36Q111.03 0.03 down from 2008783100%$3,043
22Pharmacology & TherapeuticsElsevier BV · United States
4.33Q19.88 0.93 down from 200831927%$5,660
23Drug Resistance UpdatesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.27Q111.55 3.08 up from 20086438%$5,410
4.18Q19.67 1.37 down from 20088930%$5,070
25Molecular Biology and EvolutionOAOxford University Press · United States
4.08Q111.69 3.60 up from 200884478%$3,418
26Cell Host & MicrobeCell Press · United States
4.06Q19.31 3.89 up from 2008234100%$10,400
27Molecular Aspects of MedicineElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.95Q18.12 1.80 up from 20089726%$5,220
28Developmental CellElsevier BV · United States
3.84Q110.56 0.72 up from 2008629100%$10,400
29Medicinal Research ReviewsWiley · United States
3.72Q18.50 0.51 up from 20089019%$4,980
30The EMBO JournalOASpringer Nature · Germany
3.59Q110.30 0.88 up from 20081,28694%$7,990
3.51Q17.95 2.52 up from 20081089%$4,160
32TrAC Trends in Analytical ChemistryElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.49Q15.18 0.83 up from 200838710%$5,150
33Molecular & Cellular ProteomicsOAElsevier BV · United States
3.44Q18.64 0.23 down from 2008627100%$3,430
34Molecular EcologyWiley · United Kingdom
3.39Q16.46 0.38 down from 20081,20630%$5,150
35Nature MethodsNature Portfolio · United States
3.39Q19.30 2.34 up from 200888434%$12,690
36BiofoulingTaylor & Francis · Netherlands
3.37Q15.48 0.88 up from 200814510%—
37Nature Structural & Molecular BiologyNature Portfolio · United States
3.37Q19.72 1.37 up from 200869760%$12,690
38Circulation ResearchLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
3.26Q18.71 0.48 down from 20081,15270%—
39Cellular MicrobiologyOAWiley · United Kingdom
3.21Q17.14 0.15 down from 200861274%$2,350
40Human Molecular GeneticsOxford University Press · United Kingdom
3.20Q17.93 0.47 down from 20081,16878%$4,390
41Briefings in BioinformaticsOAOxford University Press · United Kingdom
3.19Q17.98 2.33 up from 200815885%$3,885
42Stem CellsOxford University Press · United States
3.17Q18.76 0.42 up from 200899359%$4,477
43Cancer ResearchAmerican Association for Cancer Research · United States
3.16Q18.51 0.09 up from 20084,34420%—
44Cell Death and DifferentiationSpringer Nature · United Kingdom
3.11Q18.33 0.52 up from 200864341%$5,790
45Nature Chemical BiologyNature Portfolio · United States
3.09Q17.57 0.57 up from 200857850%$12,690
46Evolutionary ApplicationsOAWiley · United Kingdom
3.07Q15.33no 2008 value55100%$4,320—
47Drug Metabolism ReviewsTaylor & Francis · United States
3.07Q14.81 0.50 down from 200812439%—
48Drug Discovery TodayElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.03Q16.01 0.69 up from 20085098%$4,720
49Nature ProtocolsNature Portfolio · United States
3.03Q18.02 2.36 up from 200896945%—
50Critical Reviews in Analytical ChemistryTaylor & Francis · United States
3.01Q12.86 1.34 down from 2008500%—

Citations made in 2009. Corpus-wide, 71.4% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

273 additional Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2006–2008, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2009. Publication window: 2006–2008. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
951
Window papers (baseline)
532,780 +20.6% from indicator year 2006
Median OJR
0.95 +8.8% from indicator year 2006
Rising journals (2025)
141Comparison-group list (141)

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2006–2008 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals6096506967427658068358889199511,0031,0641,1251,1721,2171,2711,3111,3391,3651,3691,3491,3391,3581,3661,3551,367
Window papers (baseline)310,927335,262354,210375,343388,415415,247441,606472,036497,712532,780565,943595,190615,359631,115652,778672,042683,714684,441678,826679,352690,127717,801750,552768,440764,327768,613
Median OJR0.6280.6340.680.760.810.84650.8720.8940.9210.950.981.031.020.9900.9860.970.960.930.9250.9150.9120.900.8900.84740.8530.871
Category context (2025)
MeasureCategory statisticEligible population
Journal self-citation shareMedian: 1.9%1,206 journals
Retracted papers per 1,000Pooled rate: 4.798 per 1,0001,059 journals
Output growthMedian: -6.4%1,233 journals
Open access shareMedian: 100.0%1,367 journals
Listed APC (USD)Median including $0 listed prices: $3,300943 ranked journals with a known listed price, including $0 listed prices
International collaboration shareMedian: 24.4%1,335 journals
Review shareMedian: 0.3%1,367 journals
Articles-only OJRMedian: 0.871,336 journals
Uncited shareMedian: 22.7%1,367 journals
Citation concentrationMedian: 42.1%1,363 journals

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.