OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2009

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2009

Cell Biology journal rankings 2009

18 ranked journals · Subfield in Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Cell Biology has 18 ranked journals in 2009. The median OJR rose 0.24 on 2008 to 0.92, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.50. The top three are Traffic, Molecular Biology of the Cell, and The Journal of Cell Biology.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2009. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2006–2008, the window the 2009 score is computed on.

18
2% of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.92+0.24 vs 2008
This subfieldAll 0.92World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

17%
All fields: 18%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,680
Median positive listed APC: $3,680 among 9 journals. 9 have no known price. All fields: $3,510.

Subfields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (14)

18 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Cell Biology ranking, 2009

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2008. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2006–2008, the window the 2009 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2006–2008 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2009.

Compare
1TrafficWiley · United Kingdom
2.26Q16.40 0.66 up from 200849362%$4,650
2Molecular Biology of the CellAmerican Society for Cell Biology · United States
2.18Q16.20 0.24 up from 20081,42499%—
3The Journal of Cell BiologyRockefeller University Press · United States
2.15Q16.01 0.26 up from 20082,14189%—
4Studies in MycologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.07Q15.47 1.07 up from 200893100%$1,430
5Matrix BiologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.50Q13.45 0.19 up from 200820640%$4,280
6Pigment Cell ResearchWiley · United Kingdom
1.45Q23.24 0.75 down from 2008120——
7Cell Structure and FunctionOAJapan Society of Cell Biology · Japan
1.14Q23.30 1.05 up from 200854100%$753
8Cell Motility and the CytoskeletonWiley · United States
1.13Q23.11 0.29 up from 200821834%—
9Pigment Cell & Melanoma ResearchWiley · United Kingdom
0.92Q22.48 0.20 up from 200812455%$5,000
0.91Q32.01 0.16 down from 20081378%—
11Plant DiseaseAmerican Phytopathological Society · United States
0.71Q31.25 0.13 up from 20081,5049%—
12Journal of the International Society of Sports NutritionOASpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.70Q31.55 0.58 up from 200874100%$2,490
13ZebrafishMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.62Q31.16 0.07 up from 200812843%—
14Forest PathologyWiley · Germany
0.51Q31.14 0.39 down from 20081346%$3,680
0.50Q40.98 0.16 down from 200812895%—
16Cellular and Molecular BioengineeringSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.38Q40.79no 2008 value3960%$3,690—
17MycotaxonMycotaxon Publications · United States
0.11Q40.21 0.03 up from 200870598%—
18MycobiologyOATaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.09Q40.20 0.04 down from 2008146100%$1,134

Citations made in 2009. Corpus-wide, 71.4% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

9 additional Cell Biology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2006–2008, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2009. Publication window: 2006–2008. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
18
Window papers (baseline)
37,219 +17.9% from indicator year 2006
Median OJR
0.92 +42.0% from indicator year 2006
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2006–2008 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals913131414151517171820212323252626262628292726262628
Window papers (baseline)24,17526,09526,84828,23028,59530,38631,57133,48034,99737,21939,55041,49542,94243,74644,74445,78646,28746,55546,30146,57347,05048,57249,89750,58849,67049,714
Median OJR0.520.480.510.690.580.630.640.900.680.921.091.171.060.940.910.8651.021.070.960.8590.850.930.820.8640.760.75

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.