OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2010

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2010

Cell Biology journal rankings 2010

20 ranked journals · Subfield in Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Cell Biology has 20 ranked journals in 2010. The median OJR rose 0.17 on 2009 to 1.09, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.49. The top three are The Journal of Cell Biology, Studies in Mycology, and Molecular Biology of the Cell.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2010. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2007–2009, the window the 2010 score is computed on.

20
2% of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.09+0.17 vs 2009
This subfieldAll 0.93World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

15%
All fields: 20%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,585
Median positive listed APC: $3,585 among 10 journals. 10 have no known price. All fields: $3,490.

Subfields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (14)

20 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Cell Biology ranking, 2010

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2009. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2007–2009, the window the 2010 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2007–2009 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2001 to 2010.

Compare
1The Journal of Cell BiologyRockefeller University Press · United States
2.20Q16.63 0.62 up from 20091,99889%—
2Studies in MycologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.19Q13.67 1.80 down from 20097393%$1,430
3Molecular Biology of the CellAmerican Society for Cell Biology · United States
2.19Q16.20no change1,393100%—
4TrafficWiley · United Kingdom
2.07Q15.33 1.08 down from 200951463%$4,650
5Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of FungiNational Herbarium of the Netherlands · Netherlands
1.49Q13.49 0.47 down from 20095855%—
6Matrix BiologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.47Q23.22 0.23 down from 200920442%$4,280
7Pigment Cell ResearchWiley · United Kingdom
1.29Q2—no 2009 value59100%—
8Cell Motility and the CytoskeletonWiley · United States
1.28Q23.70 0.59 up from 2009235——
1.14Q22.84 0.83 up from 200913713%—
10Cell Structure and FunctionOAJapan Society of Cell Biology · Japan
1.12Q23.68 0.38 up from 200950100%$753
11Fungal DiversitySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.06Q36.12 4.38 up from 20093019%$3,490
12Pigment Cell & Melanoma ResearchWiley · United Kingdom
0.93Q32.82 0.34 up from 200924957%$5,000
13Cellular and Molecular BioengineeringSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.88Q31.99 1.19 up from 20099271%$3,690
14Journal of the International Society of Sports NutritionOASpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.77Q32.14 0.59 up from 200989100%$2,490
15ZebrafishMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.72Q31.64 0.48 up from 200913638%—
16Plant DiseaseAmerican Phytopathological Society · United States
0.69Q41.21 0.04 down from 20091,51112%—
17Forest PathologyWiley · Germany
0.65Q41.34 0.20 up from 200915011%$3,680
0.38Q41.00 0.02 up from 200912699%—
19MycotaxonMycotaxon Publications · United States
0.18Q40.42 0.21 up from 200977299%—
20MycobiologyOATaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.15Q40.45 0.25 up from 200916295%$1,134

Citations made in 2010. Corpus-wide, 73.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

9 additional Cell Biology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2007–2009, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2010. Publication window: 2007–2009. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
20
Window papers (baseline)
39,550 +18.1% from indicator year 2007
Median OJR
1.09 +20.6% from indicator year 2007
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2007–2009 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals913131414151517171820212323252626262628292726262628
Window papers (baseline)24,17526,09526,84828,23028,59530,38631,57133,48034,99737,21939,55041,49542,94243,74644,74445,78646,28746,55546,30146,57347,05048,57249,89750,58849,67049,714
Median OJR0.520.480.510.690.580.630.640.900.680.921.091.171.060.940.910.8651.021.070.960.8590.850.930.820.8640.760.75

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.