OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2010

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2010

Pathology and Forensic Medicine journal rankings 2010

21 ranked journals · Subfield in Medicine

Pathology and Forensic Medicine has 21 ranked journals in 2010. The median journal has an OJR of 0.48, below the world average of 1.00, down 0.03 on 2009; Q1 starts at OJR 1.11. The top three are Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Dermato-Endocrinology, and Rehabilitation Psychology.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2010. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2007–2009, the window the 2010 score is computed on.

21
<1% of Medicine
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.48-0.03 vs 2009
This subfieldAll 0.93World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

19%
All fields: 20%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,935
Median positive listed APC: $3,935 among 8 journals. 13 have no known price. All fields: $3,490.

Subfields of Medicine (42)

Show all 42 subfields

21 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Pathology and Forensic Medicine ranking, 2010

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2009. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2007–2009, the window the 2010 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2007–2009 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2001 to 2010.

Compare
1Multiple Sclerosis JournalSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.85Q14.31 0.77 up from 200961118%$4,400
2Dermato-EndocrinologyOATaylor & Francis · United States
1.68Q12.51no 2009 value53100%——
3Rehabilitation PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
1.57Q12.78 1.03 up from 200916318%—
4Pain PhysicianAmerican Society of Interventional Pain Physicians · United States
1.48Q17.65 0.26 up from 200924649%—
1.39Q13.03 0.11 down from 200960826%$3,980
6Journal of Spinal Cord MedicineTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.11Q12.06 0.01 down from 200920688%—
7Familial CancerSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.95Q21.87 0.54 down from 200919125%$2,990
8Hematological OncologyWiley · United Kingdom
0.91Q22.41 0.10 up from 200911913%$4,650
9Spinal CordSpringer Nature · United Kingdom
0.86Q22.29 0.44 up from 200943713%$4,990
10Journal of HematopathologySpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.65Q21.45 0.20 up from 20094093%$3,890
11Wiener Medizinische WochenschriftSpringer Science+Business Media · Austria
0.48Q20.60 0.46 down from 20092975%$3,490
12Hereditary Cancer in Clinical PracticeOABioMed Central · Poland
0.47Q31.37 1.10 up from 200950100%$2,690
13PathobiologyKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.43Q30.92 0.02 down from 200951120%—
14SAS JournalElsevier BV · United States
0.33Q30.73 0.45 up from 20097473%—
15StrabismusTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.32Q30.72 0.11 up from 20099310%—
0.20Q30.49 0.06 up from 200910227%—
0.19Q40.44 0.18 up from 20096829%—
0.09Q40.24 0.14 up from 2009740%—
19American Orthoptic JournalUniversity of Wisconsin Press · United States
0.04Q40.14 0.02 up from 2009590%—
20Chaye kexueOAChina Tea Society · China
0.02Q40.02no change1640%—
0.02Q40.04 0.08 down from 2009217——

Citations made in 2010. Corpus-wide, 73.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

6 additional Pathology and Forensic Medicine journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2007–2009, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2010. Publication window: 2007–2009. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
21
Window papers (baseline)
52,322 +26.9% from indicator year 2007
Median OJR
0.48 -29.7% from indicator year 2007
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2007–2009 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1014151516171717181821212022212324253031302629292929
Window papers (baseline)24,17927,58029,29831,40932,00234,87637,94441,22844,11947,92452,32256,15758,69860,35063,26065,47367,58868,12469,16770,31272,20475,79579,93582,31082,34282,497
Median OJR0.530.390.5600.350.610.710.5550.680.8810.500.480.470.830.7940.900.800.820.740.760.7880.8770.850.7520.7470.720.67

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.