OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2011

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2011

Media Technology journal rankings 2011

19 ranked journals · Subfield in Engineering

Media Technology has 19 ranked journals in 2011. The median OJR fell 0.31 on 2010 to 1.14, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 2.26. The top three are Telecommunications Policy, Information Technologies and International Development, and IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2011. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2008–2010, the window the 2011 score is computed on.

19
1% of Engineering
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.14-0.31 vs 2010
This subfieldAll 0.94World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

16%
All fields: 22%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,870
Median positive listed APC: $3,870 among 7 journals. 12 have no known price. All fields: $3,470.

Subfields of Engineering (16)

Show all 16 subfields

19 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Media Technology ranking, 2011

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2010. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2008–2010, the window the 2011 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2008–2010 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2002 to 2011.

Compare
1Telecommunications PolicyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.11Q13.88 2.01 up from 201018011%$3,870
2Information Technologies and International DevelopmentOAUniversity of Southern California · United States
3.21Q11.02 0.79 down from 201065100%—
3IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.95Q13.88 0.50 up from 20101,3266%$2,645
4Information Technology for DevelopmentTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.34Q11.17 0.05 up from 20107421%—
5Journal of Urban TechnologyTaylor & Francis · United States
2.26Q11.13 0.09 up from 20104711%—
6IEEE Transactions on EducationIEEE Education Society · United States
2.22Q21.67 0.15 down from 20103108%$2,645
7IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote SensingOAInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
1.83Q22.02 0.40 up from 20102014%$1,800
8InfoEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
1.75Q20.86 0.24 down from 20101434%—
9International Journal of Remote SensingTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.38Q21.71 0.18 down from 20101,2098%—
10International Journal of Digital TelevisionIntellect · United Kingdom
1.14Q20.53no 2010 value365%——
11Remote Sensing LettersTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.08Q31.25no 2010 value4011%——
12Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and PracticeAmerican Society of Civil Engineers · United States
1.04Q30.72 0.21 up from 201012213%—
13Journal of Applied Remote SensingSPIE · United States
0.96Q31.03 0.25 down from 201024110%—
14Australasian journal of engineering educationTaylor & Francis · Australia
0.80Q30.59 0.24 up from 20104424%—
15Education for Chemical EngineersElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.78Q30.90 0.15 down from 20103313%$3,880
0.36Q40.34 0.11 down from 2010978%$4,400
0.26Q40.19 0.05 down from 201013714%—
18Chemical Engineering EducationAmerican Society for Engineering Education · United States
0.25Q40.21 0.02 down from 2010740%—
0.22Q40.11 0.08 down from 2010907%$4,150

Citations made in 2011. Corpus-wide, 75.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

15 additional Media Technology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2008–2010, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2011. Publication window: 2008–2010. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
19
Window papers (baseline)
22,320 +28.8% from indicator year 2008
Median OJR
1.14 +4.1% from indicator year 2008
Rising journals (2025)
2

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2008–2010 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1211101111131315161817192326282931272926292724242221
Window papers (baseline)7,7718,4309,16110,07910,78111,67313,12815,17117,32419,10920,71022,32024,15325,49826,34626,43426,00024,95924,26324,26625,85027,68329,55429,97131,01134,383
Median OJR0.460.630.861.081.381.361.0341.2111.091.051.451.141.341.131.221.121.2081.180.891.0020.9991.060.980.760.941.025

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.