OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2011

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2011

Pollution journal rankings 2011

44 ranked journals · Subfield in Environmental Science

Pollution has 44 ranked journals in 2011. The median OJR rose 0.11 on 2010 to 1.01, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 2.02. The top three are Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, Journal of Environmental Management, and Water Research.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2011. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2008–2010, the window the 2011 score is computed on.

44
6% of Environmental Science
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.01+0.11 vs 2010
This subfieldAll 0.94World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

23%
All fields: 22%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,740
Median positive listed APC: $3,740 among 25 journals. 19 have no known price. All fields: $3,470.

Subfields of Environmental Science (11)

44 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Pollution ranking, 2011

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2010. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2008–2010, the window the 2011 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2008–2010 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2002 to 2011.

Compare
5.44Q16.38 0.84 up from 20105810%—
2Journal of Environmental ManagementElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.73Q13.73 0.16 up from 201091914%$3,750
3Water ResearchElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.55Q14.91 0.20 up from 20101,6229%$4,660
4Journal of Hazardous MaterialsElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.10Q14.20 0.47 up from 20104,9318%$4,340
5Bioresource TechnologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.04Q15.39 0.44 up from 20103,66110%$4,880
6The Science of The Total EnvironmentElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.93Q14.03 0.14 up from 20101,98813%$4,250
7Environmental PollutionElsevier BV · United Kingdom
2.91Q14.15 0.38 up from 20101,33512%$4,090
8Aquatic ToxicologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.56Q14.52 0.75 up from 201062011%$3,320
9ChemosphereElsevier BV · United Kingdom
2.49Q13.64 0.02 up from 20102,66211%$4,010
10Marine Pollution BulletinElsevier BV · United Kingdom
2.08Q13.09 0.38 up from 20101,03312%$3,740
2.02Q13.13 1.77 up from 201012113%$2,750
12Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/TechnologySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.80Q21.77 0.52 down from 20109424%$5,190
1.69Q22.37 0.05 down from 201040811%$3,870
14Environmental Geochemistry and HealthSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.64Q22.35 0.35 up from 201023310%$2,590
15BiodegradationSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.46Q21.89 0.19 down from 201027514%$3,590
16Environmental Chemistry LettersSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.30Q21.27 0.21 down from 201017515%$3,190
17Environmental Monitoring and AssessmentSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.19Q21.48 0.32 up from 20101,6898%$2,790
18Water Air & Soil PollutionSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.15Q21.45 0.01 down from 20101,07714%$3,890
1.14Q21.56 0.46 up from 201036011%$3,500
1.05Q21.54 1.05 up from 20107249%—
1.04Q21.44 0.66 up from 201030992%—
22Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and ToxicologySpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.03Q21.42 0.17 up from 20108557%$3,990
1.00Q31.45 0.19 up from 20106118%—
24CLEAN - Soil Air WaterWiley · Germany
0.97Q32.10 0.76 up from 201044210%$4,220
25Environmental Engineering ScienceMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.78Q31.11 0.08 up from 201048013%—
26Water Environment ResearchWiley · United States
0.74Q31.01 0.02 up from 201050919%$3,240
0.68Q31.01 0.06 up from 20101550%—
0.67Q30.86 0.40 up from 201019947%—
29Chemistry and EcologyTaylor & Francis · United States
0.64Q30.87 0.03 down from 20101949%—
30Bioremediation JournalTaylor & Francis · United States
0.57Q31.08 0.30 up from 2010574%—
31International Journal of Environment and PollutionInderscience Publishers · United Kingdom
0.55Q30.48 0.30 down from 201036510%—
32Journal of Environmental ProtectionOAScientific Research Publishing · United States
0.50Q30.63 0.63 up from 201056100%—
33Environmental Quality ManagementWiley · United States
0.44Q30.36 0.14 up from 20101135%$3,300
34Chemical Speciation and BioavailabilityOATaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.42Q40.53 0.21 down from 20108359%$1,270
35International Journal of Environment and HealthOAInderscience Publishers · United Kingdom
0.41Q40.59 0.12 up from 20107813%—
0.40Q40.47 0.10 down from 2010116——
37International Oil Spill Conference ProceedingsAtlantis Press · United States
0.40Q4—no 2010 value2053%—
38International Journal on Environmental SciencesNational Environmental Science Academy · India
0.35Q40.45 0.45 up from 2010590%—
39Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry ReviewsTaylor & Francis · Netherlands
0.34Q40.51 0.10 up from 20104653%—
40Journal of Energy in Southern AfricaOAUniversity of Cape Town · South Africa
0.31Q40.48 0.31 up from 201049100%$271
41Environmental Sciences EuropeOASpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.21Q40.43 0.21 down from 201088100%$3,290
42Journal of Urban and Environmental EngineeringOAUniversity do Vale do Paraíba · Brazil
0.18Q40.11 0.03 down from 201051100%—
43Water PracticeWater Environment Federation · United States
0.12Q40.00 0.19 down from 201036——
0.10Q40.19no change66100%—

Citations made in 2011. Corpus-wide, 75.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

6 additional Pollution journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2008–2010, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2011. Publication window: 2008–2010. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
44
Window papers (baseline)
25,933 +26.6% from indicator year 2008
Median OJR
1.01 +10.1% from indicator year 2008
Rising journals (2025)
5

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2008–2010 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2828293132333535394142444748515356585859615861676967
Window papers (baseline)11,57012,50112,96414,04514,76416,05117,16618,64720,48822,39824,12225,93327,93330,14032,68534,95736,08636,73237,60939,89943,42949,24956,18962,92168,04573,512
Median OJR0.7850.8430.890.960.8550.8640.9450.9330.9210.7890.901.010.8780.9170.9190.8750.870.9090.780.8310.8340.8390.9350.9110.9271.04

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.