Journal rankings · indicator year 2013
Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.
Subfield ranking · 2013
Small Animals journal rankings 2013
48 ranked journals · Subfield in Veterinary
Small Animals has 48 ranked journals in 2013. The median journal has an OJR of 0.63, below the world average of 1.00, down 0.05 on 2012; Q1 starts at OJR 1.00. The top three are International Journal for Parasitology Drugs and Drug Resistance, Veterinary Parasitology, and Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.
Ranks and citation indicators: 2013. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.
Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2010–2012, the window the 2013 score is computed on.
The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.
The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.
The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.
Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.
Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.
Subfields of Veterinary (2)
48 ranked journals
Filters
Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest. | OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields. The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list. | Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field. ▲ or ▼ is the change from 2012. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. | Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2010–2012, the window the 2013 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked. | Share of the journal’s 2010–2012 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal. | List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed. | The line is the journal’s OJR from 2004 to 2013. | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1International Journal for Parasitology Drugs and Drug ResistanceOAElsevier BV · Netherlands | 1.97Q1 | 3.13 0.38 up from 2012 | 39 | 100% | $2,700 | ||
2Veterinary ParasitologyElsevier BV · Netherlands | 1.58Q1 | 3.06 0.49 up from 2012 | 1,511 | 19% | $3,680 | ||
3Journal of Veterinary Internal MedicineOAWiley · United States | 1.48Q1 | 2.77 0.16 up from 2012 | 553 | 57% | $2,000 | ||
4Applied Animal Behaviour ScienceElsevier BV · Netherlands | 1.46Q1 | 2.21 0.33 up from 2012 | 481 | 15% | $3,220 | ||
5Veterinary Anaesthesia and AnalgesiaElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 1.39Q1 | 2.13 0.42 up from 2012 | 258 | 21% | $3,000 | ||
6BMC Veterinary ResearchOABioMed Central · United Kingdom | 1.34Q1 | 2.42 0.33 down from 2012 | 389 | 100% | $3,190 | ||
7The Veterinary JournalElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 1.17Q1 | 1.99 0.03 up from 2012 | 866 | 17% | $3,310 | ||
8Animal WelfareOACambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 1.17Q1 | 1.68 0.29 up from 2012 | 267 | 32% | $3,550 | ||
9American Journal of Veterinary ResearchOAAmerican Veterinary Medical Association · United States | 1.13Q1 | 1.83 0.02 up from 2012 | 681 | 65% | — | ||
10Veterinary SurgeryWiley · United Kingdom | 1.12Q1 | 1.34 0.36 down from 2012 | 464 | 11% | $3,000 | ||
11Acta veterinaria ScandinavicaOABioMed Central · Denmark | 1.11Q1 | 1.87 0.09 up from 2012 | 248 | 100% | $2,990 | ||
12ILAR JournalOxford University Press · United States | 1.00Q1 | 1.65 0.71 down from 2012 | 125 | 88% | — | ||
13Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal PracticeElsevier BV · United States | 1.00Q2 | 1.33 0.76 down from 2012 | 228 | 5% | $2,950 | ||
14Journal of the American Veterinary Medical AssociationAmerican Veterinary Medical Association · United States | 1.00Q2 | 1.52 0.08 up from 2012 | 884 | 51% | — | ||
15Topics in companion animal medicineElsevier BV · United States | 0.96Q2 | 1.62 0.22 up from 2012 | 81 | 0% | $2,740 | ||
16Research in Veterinary ScienceElsevier BV · Netherlands | 0.95Q2 | 1.66 0.18 up from 2012 | 787 | 16% | $3,290 | ||
17New Zealand Veterinary JournalTaylor & Francis · New Zealand | 0.86Q2 | 1.26 0.24 down from 2012 | 220 | 8% | — | ||
18Zoo BiologyWiley · United States | 0.80Q2 | 1.14 0.09 up from 2012 | 177 | 13% | $3,920 | ||
19Veterinary Clinics of North America Exotic Animal PracticeElsevier BV · United States | 0.79Q2 | 0.87 0.23 down from 2012 | 103 | 14% | $3,000 | ||
20Journal of Feline Medicine and SurgeryOASAGE Publishing · United Kingdom | 0.76Q2 | 1.63 0.19 up from 2012 | 444 | 100% | $1,800 | ||
21Journal of Applied Animal Welfare ScienceTaylor & Francis · United States | 0.73Q2 | 0.93 0.35 down from 2012 | 69 | 48% | — | ||
22Journal of Veterinary ScienceOAKorean Society of Veterinary Science · South Korea | 0.71Q2 | 1.34 0.15 down from 2012 | 185 | 100% | $300 | ||
23Journal of Small Animal PracticeWiley · United Kingdom | 0.70Q2 | 1.16 0.35 down from 2012 | 356 | 21% | $4,520 | ||
24Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and TraumatologySchattauer Verlag | 0.65Q2 | 1.15 0.03 up from 2012 | 288 | 4% | — | ||
25Alternatives to Laboratory AnimalsSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom | 0.61Q3 | 1.17 0.01 up from 2012 | 150 | 24% | $4,150 | ||
26Laboratory AnimalsSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom | 0.57Q3 | 1.02 0.40 down from 2012 | 146 | 28% | $3,400 | ||
27Veterinární MedicínaOACzech Academy of Agricultural Sciences · Czechia | 0.55Q3 | 1.10 0.19 up from 2012 | 240 | 100% | $609 | ||
28The journal of applied research in veterinary medicineUnited States | 0.55Q3 | 0.80 0.08 down from 2012 | 37 | 0% | — | ||
29Acta Veterinaria HungaricaAkadémiai Kiadó · Hungary | 0.51Q3 | 0.87 0.37 down from 2012 | 160 | 35% | — | ||
30Journal of Zoo and Wildlife MedicineAmerican Association of Zoo Veterinarians · United States | 0.47Q3 | 0.78 0.19 up from 2012 | 413 | 3% | — | ||
31Laboratory Animal ResearchOABioMed Central · South Korea | 0.44Q3 | 1.46 0.69 up from 2012 | 159 | 100% | $0 listed | ||
32Journal of Exotic Pet MedicineElsevier BV · United States | 0.43Q3 | 0.91 0.40 up from 2012 | 126 | 5% | $3,620 | ||
33In PracticeWiley · United Kingdom | 0.33Q3 | 0.37 0.18 down from 2012 | 180 | 15% | $2,900 | ||
34Acta Veterinaria BrnoOAUniversity of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno · Czechia | 0.32Q3 | 0.50 0.04 up from 2012 | 356 | 94% | — | ||
35Journal of the South African Veterinary AssociationOAAOSIS · South Africa | 0.31Q3 | 0.51 0.02 up from 2012 | 138 | 100% | $65 | ||
36Slovenian Veterinary ResearchOASlovenia | 0.29Q3 | 0.41 0.27 down from 2012 | 54 | 0% | — | ||
37Wiener Tierarztliche MonatsschriftAustrian Society of Veterinarians | 0.23Q4 | 0.14 0.18 down from 2012 | 48 | 0% | — | ||
38Schweizer Archiv für TierheilkundeSociety of Swiss Veterinarians · Switzerland | 0.20Q4 | 0.21 0.03 down from 2012 | 486 | 5% | — | ||
39Acta veterinariaOADe Gruyter Open · Serbia | 0.19Q4 | 0.36 0.05 down from 2012 | 181 | 100% | $129 | ||
40Tierärztliche Praxis Ausgabe G Großtiere / NutztiereSchattauer Verlag · Germany | 0.17Q4 | 0.40 0.28 up from 2012 | 195 | 3% | — | ||
41Vlaams Diergeneeskundig TijdschriftGhent University · Belgium | 0.15Q4 | 0.21 0.02 up from 2012 | 180 | 36% | — | ||
42Tierärztliche Praxis Ausgabe K Kleintiere / HeimtiereSchattauer Verlag · Germany | 0.14Q4 | 0.29 0.10 up from 2012 | 194 | 1% | — | ||
43The Thai Journal of Veterinary MedicinePublisher not listed | 0.11Q4 | 0.25 0.01 up from 2012 | 238 | 97% | — | ||
44Veterinary Science DevelopmentOAPAGEPress (Italy) · Italy | 0.10Q4 | 0.15 0.11 down from 2012 | 71 | 100% | — | ||
45LivestockUnited Kingdom | 0.07Q4 | 0.11 0.06 up from 2012 | 201 | 3% | — | ||
46Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche WochenschriftOASchluetersche GmbH and Co · Germany | 0.03Q4 | 0.03 0.02 down from 2012 | 57 | 0% | — | ||
47Companion animalUnited Kingdom | 0.03Q4 | 0.04 0.02 up from 2012 | 315 | 1% | — | ||
48The Veterinary NurseMark Allen Group · United Kingdom | 0.02Q4 | 0.14no change | 212 | 2% | — |
Citations made in 2013. Corpus-wide, 76.9% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.
11 additional Small Animals journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2010–2012, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.
At a glance
Indicator year: 2013. Publication window: 2010–2012. How these summaries are calculated
- Ranked journals
- 48
- Window papers (baseline)
- 14,423 +18.9% from indicator year 2010
- Median OJR
- 0.63 +14.1% from indicator year 2010
- Rising journals (2025)
- 7
Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2010–2012 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.
| Measure | Year series | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked journals | 28 | 33 | 35 | 35 | 36 | 36 | 37 | 43 | 43 | 42 | 45 | 46 | 48 | 48 | 49 | 51 | 55 | 58 | 62 | 59 | 61 | 61 | 63 | 63 | 60 | 60 | |
| Window papers (baseline) | 5,959 | 6,619 | 6,728 | 7,217 | 7,093 | 7,527 | 8,162 | 9,019 | 9,862 | 10,734 | 12,132 | 13,551 | 14,194 | 14,423 | 14,750 | 15,717 | 16,212 | 16,177 | 16,212 | 16,502 | 17,026 | 17,717 | 18,291 | 18,631 | 18,602 | 18,615 | |
| Median OJR | 0.43 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.525 | 0.572 | 0.55 | 0.665 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.592 | 0.5931 | 0.656 | 0.5928 | 0.590 | 0.594 | 0.58 | 0.566 | 0.585 | 0.60 | 0.519 |
How to read these rankings
- OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
- A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
- Quartiles
- Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
- Impact factor (2-year)
- Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
- Rank ranges
- Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.