Journal rankings · indicator year 2014
Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.
Subfield ranking · 2014
Cognitive Neuroscience journal rankings 2014
228 ranked journals · Subfield in Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience has 228 ranked journals in 2014. Its median journal scores above the world average: OJR 1.12 against 1.00, down 0.03 on 2013. A journal needs OJR 1.61 to reach Q1. The top three are Current Directions in Psychological Science, Nature Neuroscience, and Neuron.
Ranks and citation indicators: 2014. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.
Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2011–2013, the window the 2014 score is computed on.
The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.
The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.
The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.
Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.
Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.
Subfields of Neuroscience (8)
228 ranked journals
Filters
Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest. | OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields. The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list. | Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field. ▲ or ▼ is the change from 2013. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. | Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2011–2013, the window the 2014 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked. | Share of the journal’s 2011–2013 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal. | List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed. | The line is the journal’s OJR from 2005 to 2014. | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1Current Directions in Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom | 5.83Q1 | 9.18 0.68 up from 2013 | 221 | 32% | $3,900 | ||
2Nature NeuroscienceNature Portfolio · United States | 5.75Q1 | 16.79 1.74 up from 2013 | 861 | 65% | $12,690 | ||
3NeuronCell Press · United States | 5.37Q1 | 14.58 1.35 down from 2013 | 1,377 | 99% | $10,400 | ||
4Psychological ReviewAmerican Psychological Association · United States | 5.20Q1 | 9.05 0.48 down from 2013 | 111 | 31% | — | ||
5Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United States | 4.83Q1 | 7.34 0.10 up from 2013 | 829 | 36% | $3,900 | ||
6Progress in NeurobiologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 4.54Q1 | 12.76 1.63 up from 2013 | 230 | 34% | $5,190 | ||
7Cognitive PsychologyElsevier BV · United States | 3.98Q1 | 7.47 2.33 up from 2013 | 64 | 19% | $3,570 | ||
8Neuropsychology ReviewSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 3.92Q1 | 7.22 0.09 up from 2013 | 78 | 61% | $3,890 | ||
9Molecular PsychiatrySpringer Nature · United Kingdom | 3.73Q1 | 10.41 0.26 up from 2013 | 529 | 71% | $5,490 | ||
10Neuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsElsevier BV · United States | 3.53Q1 | 10.99 0.32 up from 2013 | 461 | 33% | $4,860 | ||
11Journal of Experimental Psychology GeneralAmerican Psychological Association | 3.14Q1 | 5.29 0.18 down from 2013 | 310 | 48% | — | ||
12Biological PsychiatryElsevier BV · United States | 2.95Q1 | 6.97 0.41 up from 2013 | 1,417 | 46% | $5,489 | ||
13NeuroImageOAElsevier BV · United States | 2.84Q1 | 6.98 0.74 down from 2013 | 3,080 | 56% | $3,540 | ||
14Journal of NeuroscienceSociety for Neuroscience · United States | 2.79Q1 | 7.73 0.54 down from 2013 | 5,452 | 97% | — | ||
15Translational PsychiatryOASpringer Nature · United States | 2.74Q1 | 8.13 1.25 up from 2013 | 322 | 100% | $5,290 | ||
16Annual Review of PsychologyAnnual Reviews · United States | 2.73Q1 | 18.10 1.62 down from 2013 | 66 | 64% | — | ||
17CognitionElsevier BV · Netherlands | 2.73Q1 | 4.47 0.01 down from 2013 | 503 | 37% | $3,910 | ||
18Molecular AutismOABioMed Central · United Kingdom | 2.70Q1 | 7.57 0.97 down from 2013 | 87 | 100% | $3,990 | ||
19Brain ConnectivityMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States | 2.68Q1 | 6.11 1.45 down from 2013 | 135 | 74% | — | ||
20Adaptive BehaviorSAGE Publishing · United States | 2.60Q1 | 3.76 1.57 up from 2013 | 96 | 20% | $4,150 | ||
21The NeuroscientistSAGE Publishing · United States | 2.56Q1 | 5.84 1.14 down from 2013 | 193 | 32% | $4,400 | ||
22Current BiologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 2.56Q1 | 6.16 0.01 up from 2013 | 2,205 | 99% | $7,030 | ||
23Social Cognitive and Affective NeuroscienceOAUniversity of Oxford · United Kingdom | 2.54Q1 | 5.25 0.38 down from 2013 | 437 | 100% | $2,379 | ||
24Cerebral CortexOxford University Press · United States | 2.50Q1 | 5.86 0.92 down from 2013 | 1,127 | 67% | $5,038 | ||
25Mind & LanguageWiley · United Kingdom | 2.42Q1 | 3.07 0.19 up from 2013 | 85 | 23% | $4,150 | ||
26Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesWiley · United States | 2.38Q1 | 5.38 0.44 down from 2013 | 1,214 | 41% | $5,080 | ||
27Topics in Cognitive ScienceWiley · United States | 2.38Q1 | 3.57 0.92 up from 2013 | 166 | 66% | $3,470 | ||
28Human Brain MappingOAWiley · United States | 2.34Q1 | 5.27 0.61 down from 2013 | 796 | 96% | $3,520 | ||
29Journal of Memory and LanguageElsevier BV · United States | 2.30Q1 | 5.05 1.93 up from 2013 | 239 | 40% | $4,670 | ||
30IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringOAInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States | 2.25Q1 | 4.48 0.04 down from 2013 | 329 | 41% | $2,075 | ||
31Annual Review of NeuroscienceAnnual Reviews · United States | 2.23Q1 | 25.76 4.39 down from 2013 | 75 | 69% | — | ||
32Neurobiology of AgingElsevier BV · United States | 2.22Q1 | 5.44 0.25 down from 2013 | 950 | 38% | $3,430 | ||
33Cognitive ScienceWiley · United States | 2.21Q1 | 2.95 0.43 down from 2013 | 259 | 46% | $4,000 | ||
34Developmental Cognitive NeuroscienceOAElsevier BV · Netherlands | 2.16Q1 | 4.47 0.58 down from 2013 | 172 | 100% | $3,650 | ||
35Behavior Research MethodsSpringer Science+Business Media · United States | 2.09Q1 | 2.98 0.15 down from 2013 | 370 | 55% | $3,990 | ||
36International Journal of Neural SystemsWorld Scientific · Singapore | 2.07Q1 | 6.34 0.07 up from 2013 | 133 | 24% | — | ||
36Nature reviews. NeuroscienceNature Portfolio · United Kingdom | 2.07Q1 | 9.96 0.72 down from 2013 | 684 | 17% | — | ||
38Brain Imaging and BehaviorSpringer Science+Business Media · United States | 2.04Q1 | 5.16 0.47 up from 2013 | 168 | 51% | $3,790 | ||
39Trends in Cognitive SciencesElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 2.04Q1 | 13.49 1.20 down from 2013 | 341 | 51% | $7,030 | ||
40NeuroImage ClinicalOAElsevier BV · Netherlands | 2.03Q1 | 4.36 2.51 up from 2013 | 201 | 100% | $3,490 | ||
41Journal of Neural EngineeringIOP Publishing · United Kingdom | 2.02Q1 | 5.87 0.19 up from 2013 | 435 | 74% | $3,325 | ||
42IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental DevelopmentInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States | 2.01Q1 | 2.22 0.19 up from 2013 | 82 | 47% | — | ||
43Frontiers in Systems NeuroscienceOAFrontiers Media · Switzerland | 1.92Q1 | 5.10 0.06 down from 2013 | 311 | 100% | $3,801 | ||
44Ear and HearingLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States | 1.89Q1 | 3.04 2.60 down from 2013 | 265 | 42% | — | ||
45Journal of Cognitive NeuroscienceThe MIT Press · United States | 1.82Q1 | 4.24 0.83 down from 2013 | 604 | 56% | — | ||
46Biological PsychologyElsevier BV · Netherlands | 1.80Q1 | 4.05 0.03 down from 2013 | 489 | 36% | $3,440 | ||
47Brain and LanguageElsevier BV · Netherlands | 1.79Q1 | 3.74 0.01 up from 2013 | 367 | 37% | $3,170 | ||
48CortexElsevier BV · Italy | 1.77Q1 | 4.26 0.19 up from 2013 | 578 | 34% | $3,830 | ||
49Reviews in the NeurosciencesDe Gruyter · Germany | 1.68Q1 | 4.50 0.09 down from 2013 | 146 | 18% | $2,712 | ||
50Psychiatry Research NeuroimagingElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 1.66Q1 | 3.86 0.17 down from 2013 | 451 | 36% | $3,110 |
Subfields of Neuroscience, with Cognitive Neuroscience highlighted.
- Cognitive Neuroscience228
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience30
- Neurology19
- Sensory Systems7
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems4
- Behavioral Neuroscience3
- Biological Psychiatry3
- Developmental Neuroscience1
Journals
Citations made in 2014. Corpus-wide, 77.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.
72 additional Cognitive Neuroscience journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2011–2013, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.
At a glance
Indicator year: 2014. Publication window: 2011–2013. How these summaries are calculated
- Ranked journals
- 228
- Window papers (baseline)
- 73,499 +11.3% from indicator year 2011
- Median OJR
- 1.12 +3.7% from indicator year 2011
- Rising journals (2025)
- 26
Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2011–2013 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.
| Measure | Year series | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked journals | 150 | 154 | 162 | 170 | 174 | 177 | 177 | 181 | 185 | 193 | 208 | 215 | 222 | 226 | 228 | 240 | 247 | 250 | 255 | 260 | 260 | 270 | 279 | 285 | 290 | 287 | |
| Window papers (baseline) | 28,433 | 30,521 | 32,268 | 34,371 | 36,150 | 39,427 | 41,997 | 45,015 | 47,192 | 51,957 | 56,014 | 66,018 | 69,858 | 74,025 | 73,499 | 76,687 | 79,536 | 79,867 | 81,209 | 83,221 | 87,071 | 90,824 | 95,729 | 98,039 | 100,191 | 100,706 | |
| Median OJR | 0.84 | 0.877 | 0.904 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 1.01 | 1.05 | 1.016 | 1.0179 | 1.069 | 1.10 | 1.08 | 1.17 | 1.15 | 1.12 | 1.061 | 1.066 | 1.058 | 1.0181 | 1.068 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.901 | 0.89 | 0.880 |
How to read these rankings
- OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
- A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
- Quartiles
- Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
- Impact factor (2-year)
- Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
- Rank ranges
- Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.