OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2018

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2018

Radiation journal rankings 2018

25 ranked journals · Subfield in Physics and Astronomy

Radiation has 25 ranked journals in 2018. The median OJR fell 0.07 on 2017 to 0.52, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 0.74. The top three are Radiation Oncology, Medical Physics, and Journal of Synchrotron Radiation.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2018. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2015–2017, the window the 2018 score is computed on.

25
7% of Physics and Astronomy
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.52-0.07 vs 2017
This subfieldAll 0.83World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

44%
All fields: 33%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,160
Median positive listed APC: $3,160 among 16 journals. 9 have no known price. All fields: $3,330.

Subfields of Physics and Astronomy (8)

25 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Radiation ranking, 2018

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2017. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2015–2017, the window the 2018 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2015–2017 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2009 to 2018.

Compare
1Radiation OncologyOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
1.66Q13.79 0.12 up from 2017626100%$3,290
2Medical PhysicsWiley · United States
1.40Q12.97 0.20 up from 20171,94749%$3,360
3Journal of Synchrotron RadiationOAWiley · United Kingdom
1.29Q12.55 0.72 down from 201757265%$3,180
1.08Q11.87 0.21 up from 2017696100%$900
5Physica MedicaElsevier BV · Italy
0.93Q12.10 0.16 up from 201793937%$2,780
6X-Ray SpectrometryWiley · United Kingdom
0.81Q11.48 0.28 up from 201721527%$3,250
7Radiation MeasurementsElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.74Q11.62 0.18 up from 201754737%$3,690
8Applied Radiation and IsotopesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.67Q21.36 0.15 up from 20171,35118%$3,220
9Medical dosimetryElsevier BV · United States
0.66Q21.23 0.15 up from 20171784%$2,500
10Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in MedicineSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.65Q21.21 0.11 down from 201726817%$3,140
0.61Q21.09 0.15 down from 2017190100%$1,713
12Journal of Medical PhysicsOAMedknow · India
0.56Q20.93 0.06 down from 2017146100%—
0.52Q21.33 0.13 down from 20172,19423%$2,810
0.34Q30.57 0.34 up from 201737100%—
15Synchrotron Radiation NewsTaylor & Francis · United States
0.32Q30.77 0.04 down from 201714638%—
16Journal of Neutron ResearchIOS Press · Netherlands
0.32Q30.45 0.32 up from 20173411%$4,150
17NukleonikaOADe Gruyter Open · Poland
0.29Q30.59 0.15 down from 2017274100%$800
0.25Q30.10 0.36 down from 2017690%—
0.25Q30.41 0.04 up from 2017115100%—
20Nuclear Technology and Radiation ProtectionOAVinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences · Serbia
0.24Q40.63 0.18 up from 2017143100%$161
21Neutron NewsTaylor & Francis · United States
0.23Q40.37 0.13 down from 201713023%—
0.18Q40.40 0.01 down from 2017114100%—
0.18Q40.31 0.02 up from 2017113——
24Journal of Radiotherapy in PracticeCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.16Q40.38 0.13 up from 201718715%$3,550
25International Journal of PIXEWorld Scientific · Singapore
0.05Q40.08 0.26 down from 2017470%—

Citations made in 2018. Corpus-wide, 81.5% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

8 additional Radiation journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2015–2017, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2018. Publication window: 2015–2017. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
25
Window papers (baseline)
21,528 +6.2% from indicator year 2015
Median OJR
0.521 +1.7% from indicator year 2015
Rising journals (2025)
4

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2015–2017 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1517181616191921232424222323242424252530292928262625
Window papers (baseline)11,07810,95111,56511,95212,53413,15613,95514,79515,36615,76016,75317,54218,22218,29118,98820,28021,13521,43621,52821,63421,62520,84320,05819,00118,52518,640
Median OJR0.4570.440.3770.5150.5220.3850.320.270.310.340.3750.56390.5350.540.56410.5130.5750.5870.5210.5320.5690.4580.4780.490.4810.589

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.