Journal rankings · indicator year 2001
Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.
Subfield ranking · 2001
Automotive Engineering journal rankings 2001
Journals meeting ranking eligibility: 9. Rank rows and quartiles require at least 10 journals.
Nine Automotive Engineering journals meet eligibility for 2001, below the ten-journal minimum for publishing ranks. Browse Engineering rankings.
Ranks and citation indicators: 2001. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.
Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 score is computed on.
The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.
The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.
The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.
Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.
Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.
Subfields of Engineering (16)
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering202
- Mechanical Engineering165
- Aerospace Engineering106
- Biomedical Engineering102
- Civil and Structural Engineering98
- Mechanics of Materials81
- Control and Systems Engineering66
- Computational Mechanics65
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering34
- Building and Construction30
- Ocean Engineering27
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality14
- Automotive Engineering9
Show all 16 subfields
0 ranked journals
Filters
Subfields of Engineering, with Automotive Engineering highlighted.
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering202
- Mechanical Engineering165
- Aerospace Engineering106
- Biomedical Engineering102
- Civil and Structural Engineering98
- Mechanics of Materials81
- Control and Systems Engineering66
- Computational Mechanics65
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering34
- Building and Construction30
- Ocean Engineering27
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality14
- Media Technology11
- Automotive Engineering9
- Architecture0
- General Engineering0
Journals
Citations made in 2001. Corpus-wide, 67.0% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.
6 additional Automotive Engineering journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1998–2000, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.
At a glance
Indicator year: 2001. Publication window: 1998–2000. How these summaries are calculated
- Ranked journals
- 9
- Window papers (baseline)
- 10,537 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
- Median OJR
- 0.63 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
- Rising journals (2025)
- 1
Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1998–2000 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.
| Measure | Year series | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked journals | 7 | 9 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 14 | 16 | 21 | 20 | 21 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 24 | 25 | 27 | 30 | 34 | 36 | 38 | 43 | 44 | 42 | 42 | |
| Window papers (baseline) | 9,304 | 10,537 | 11,367 | 12,178 | 13,008 | 13,901 | 14,737 | 15,538 | 16,415 | 17,511 | 18,718 | 20,216 | 21,879 | 23,571 | 25,526 | 27,965 | 29,514 | 29,929 | 30,697 | 33,469 | 37,929 | 42,344 | 47,177 | 51,087 | 55,634 | 62,840 | |
| Median OJR | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 1.01 | 1.11 | 0.749 | 0.68 | 0.84 | 0.755 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.476 | 0.484 | 0.53 | 0.405 | 0.45 | 0.483 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.410 |
How to read these rankings
- OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
- A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
- Quartiles
- Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
- Impact factor (2-year)
- Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
- Rank ranges
- Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.