OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2001

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2001

Oceanography journal rankings 2001

45 ranked journals · Subfield in Earth and Planetary Sciences

Oceanography has 45 ranked journals in 2001. The median OJR rose 0.08 on 2000 to 0.78, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.44. The top three are Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Limnology and Oceanography, and Deep Sea Research Part I Oceanographic Research Papers.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2001. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 score is computed on.

45
16% of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.78+0.08 vs 2000
This subfieldAll 0.68World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

16%
All fields: 12%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,440
Median positive listed APC: $3,440 among 23 journals. 22 have no known price. All fields: $3,560.

Subfields of Earth and Planetary Sciences (8)

45 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Oceanography ranking, 2001

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2000. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 1998–2000 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2001.

Compare
1Global Biogeochemical CyclesWiley · United States
4.35Q14.34 0.48 up from 200022660%$4,070
2Limnology and OceanographyWiley · United States
3.29Q13.20 0.20 up from 200065856%$3,530
3.11Q13.29 0.88 up from 20002884%$3,270
4Progress In OceanographyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
2.76Q12.29 0.56 up from 20001166%$3,720
2.40Q12.77 0.35 up from 20003646%$3,760
6Marine ChemistryElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.18Q12.12 0.21 up from 20002897%$3,280
7Journal of Physical OceanographyAmerican Meteorological Society · United States
1.91Q12.42 0.26 up from 200055337%—
8EstuariesSpringer Nature · United States
1.87Q11.84 0.35 up from 20002513%—
9Journal of Marine ResearchYale University · United States
1.73Q11.56 0.23 up from 200011920%—
1.55Q11.53 0.05 up from 20006253%$3,270
11Continental Shelf ResearchElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.49Q11.54 0.47 up from 20002856%$3,260
12Journal of PhycologyWiley · United Kingdom
1.44Q11.95 0.20 up from 20004203%$3,900
13Aquatic BotanyElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.39Q21.58 0.31 up from 20002263%$3,180
14Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologyAmerican Meteorological Society · United States
1.36Q21.33 0.16 down from 200043824%—
15Journal of Sea ResearchOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.31Q21.69 0.32 up from 20001587%$2,610
16Estuarine Coastal and Shelf ScienceElsevier BV · United States
1.31Q21.17 0.04 down from 20004022%$3,410
17Journal of Plankton ResearchOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.29Q21.35 0.26 up from 200044326%$4,533
18Journal of Marine SystemsElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.28Q21.34 0.26 up from 200034710%$3,510
19OceanographyOAOceanography Society · United States
1.18Q20.62 0.21 up from 200093100%$500
20PhycologiaTaylor & Francis · United States
0.96Q21.06 0.36 up from 20002133%—
21Dynamics of Atmospheres and OceansElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.96Q21.46 0.84 up from 20001066%$3,000
22SarsiaTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.96Q21.04 0.07 up from 20001249%—
23Botanica MarinaDe Gruyter · Germany
0.78Q21.07 0.24 up from 20001978%$2,712
24Marine EcologyWiley · Germany
0.73Q30.71 0.26 up from 2000639%$3,560
25European Journal of PhycologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.73Q30.83 0.28 up from 200027563%—
26Helgoland Marine ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.71Q30.73 0.04 up from 20009794%$2,190
27Oceanologica ActaEDP Sciences · France
0.68Q30.59 0.08 down from 200021615%—
28OpheliaTaylor & Francis · Denmark
0.66Q30.63 0.02 up from 2000973%—
29Journal of OceanographySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.59Q30.77 0.17 down from 20001862%$4,090
30Marine Environmental ResearchElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.56Q30.61 0.48 down from 20004897%$3,440
31Phycological ResearchWiley · Australia
0.49Q30.64 0.24 up from 20002060%$3,800
0.48Q30.71 0.49 up from 2000570%—
33Ocean DynamicsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.47Q30.17 0.05 down from 20009110%$3,690
34Marine GeodesyTaylor & Francis · United States
0.45Q30.26 0.12 down from 2000650%—
35Records of the Australian MuseumOAAustralian Museum · Australia
0.42Q40.37 0.06 up from 200047100%—
0.33Q40.56 0.32 up from 2000840%—
37Gulf of Mexico ScienceOAUniversity of Southern Mississippi · United States
0.28Q40.32 0.22 up from 20006089%—
38Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid DynamicsTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.24Q40.43 0.47 down from 20008313%—
39OceanologiaOAElsevier BV · Poland
0.22Q40.23no change810%—
40Senckenbergiana maritimaE. Schweizerbart · Germany
0.21Q40.15 0.28 down from 2000848%—
41Estuarine and Coastal ModelingPublisher not listed
0.18Q40.07 0.18 down from 2000124——
0.17Q40.25 0.11 down from 20003783%—
43ALGAEOAKorean Society of Phycology · South Korea
0.10Q40.09 0.03 up from 2000970%—
0.07Q40.12 0.02 up from 20001910%—
45Indian Journal of Marine SciencesPublisher not listed
0.07Q40.08 0.03 up from 20001210%—

Citations made in 2001. Corpus-wide, 67.0% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

12 additional Oceanography journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1998–2000, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2001. Publication window: 1998–2000. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
45
Window papers (baseline)
24,444 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Median OJR
0.78 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Rising journals (2025)
2

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1998–2000 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals4545474750505247474846505254545755555656545352505050
Window papers (baseline)17,17224,44425,44726,72922,27623,15123,47023,73624,79226,73527,75729,26830,11232,03834,05036,18237,06538,25038,75138,83838,40738,04638,34537,53537,03037,438
Median OJR0.700.780.981.0591.021.161.171.311.361.221.271.261.0921.111.0601.191.0621.0931.051.030.960.840.820.830.810.79

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.