OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2003

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2003

Oceanography journal rankings 2003

47 ranked journals · Subfield in Earth and Planetary Sciences

Oceanography has 47 ranked journals in 2003. The median OJR rose 0.08 on 2002 to 1.06, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.80. The top three are Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Limnology and Oceanography, and Progress In Oceanography.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2003. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2000–2002, the window the 2003 score is computed on.

47
16% of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.06+0.08 vs 2002
This subfieldAll 0.75World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

15%
All fields: 13%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,280
Median positive listed APC: $3,280 among 25 journals. 22 have no known price. All fields: $3,550.

Subfields of Earth and Planetary Sciences (8)

47 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Oceanography ranking, 2003

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2002. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2000–2002, the window the 2003 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2000–2002 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2003.

Compare
1Global Biogeochemical CyclesWiley · United States
4.37Q14.40 0.22 down from 200231167%$4,070
2Limnology and OceanographyWiley · United States
3.61Q13.72 0.27 up from 200263162%$3,530
3Progress In OceanographyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.02Q12.72 0.33 down from 20022186%$3,720
2.81Q12.97 0.50 down from 20023429%$3,270
2.76Q12.82 0.37 down from 20026717%$3,760
6Marine ChemistryElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.60Q12.89 0.48 up from 20022506%$3,280
7Continental Shelf ResearchElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.18Q11.60 0.12 down from 20023834%$3,260
8Journal of Physical OceanographyAmerican Meteorological Society · United States
1.96Q12.47 0.14 up from 200265945%—
9Ocean ModellingElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.88Q12.48no change492%$3,140
10Journal of Marine SystemsElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.84Q11.83 0.08 up from 20022899%$3,510
1.84Q11.79 0.33 down from 20025987%$3,270
12Journal of Marine ResearchYale University · United States
1.80Q11.57 0.42 down from 200211415%—
13EstuariesSpringer Nature · United States
1.74Q21.78 0.19 up from 20022901%—
14Journal of Plankton ResearchOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.74Q21.99 0.34 up from 200237427%$4,533
15Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologyAmerican Meteorological Society · United States
1.63Q21.87 0.20 up from 200245049%—
16Journal of Sea ResearchOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.62Q21.60 0.19 up from 20021707%$2,610
17OceanographyOAOceanography Society · United States
1.60Q21.13 0.27 up from 2002145100%$500
18Estuarine Coastal and Shelf ScienceElsevier BV · United States
1.54Q21.58 0.12 up from 20023995%$3,410
19Journal of PhycologyWiley · United Kingdom
1.49Q21.99 0.01 up from 20024663%$3,900
20Aquatic BotanyElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.43Q21.40 0.24 up from 20022585%$3,180
21Dynamics of Atmospheres and OceansElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.29Q20.78 0.31 down from 2002949%$3,000
22PhycologiaTaylor & Francis · United States
1.17Q21.20 0.10 down from 20022310%—
23Journal of OceanographySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.09Q21.35 0.38 up from 20022030%$4,090
24Oceanologica ActaEDP Sciences · France
1.06Q21.03 0.05 up from 200215828%—
25Marine Environmental ResearchElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.04Q31.78 0.60 up from 20024243%$3,440
26European Journal of PhycologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.99Q31.33 0.38 up from 200221692%—
27OpheliaTaylor & Francis · Denmark
0.86Q31.06 0.32 up from 2002860%—
28Helgoland Marine ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.78Q30.90 0.10 down from 200285100%$2,190
29Botanica MarinaDe Gruyter · Germany
0.70Q30.86 0.19 down from 20021974%$2,712
30Marine EcologyWiley · Germany
0.62Q30.59 0.17 down from 20021047%$3,560
31SarsiaTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.61Q30.62 0.18 down from 20021337%—
32Records of the Australian MuseumOAAustralian Museum · Australia
0.57Q30.66 0.07 down from 200247100%—
0.57Q30.68 0.10 up from 2002450%—
34Senckenbergiana maritimaE. Schweizerbart · Germany
0.56Q31.17 0.85 up from 2002470%—
0.54Q30.71 0.10 up from 2002630%—
36Estuarine and Coastal ModelingPublisher not listed
0.48Q3—no 2002 value75——
37Gulf of Mexico ScienceOAUniversity of Southern Mississippi · United States
0.48Q40.47 0.08 down from 200248100%—
0.48Q40.46no change3692%—
39Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid DynamicsTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.37Q40.77 0.19 down from 20026912%—
40OceanologiaOAElsevier BV · Poland
0.37Q40.71 0.27 up from 2002380%—
41Marine GeodesyTaylor & Francis · United States
0.37Q40.39 0.14 up from 2002697%—
42Phycological ResearchWiley · Australia
0.34Q40.38 0.01 up from 20022120%$3,800
43ALGAEOAKorean Society of Phycology · South Korea
0.15Q40.29 0.03 down from 200210458%—
44Indian Journal of Marine SciencesPublisher not listed
0.12Q40.14 0.02 up from 20021360%—
0.12Q40.22 0.14 up from 20021710%—
46Acta Oceanologica SinicaSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.04Q40.04no change2120%$3,090
47Journal of Ocean University of ChinaSpringer Science+Business Media · China
0.00Q40.03no 2002 value380%$2,990—

Citations made in 2003. Corpus-wide, 70.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

14 additional Oceanography journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2000–2002, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2003. Publication window: 2000–2002. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
47
Window papers (baseline)
26,729 +55.7% from indicator year 2000
Median OJR
1.059 +50.8% from indicator year 2000
Rising journals (2025)
2

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2000–2002 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals4545474750505247474846505254545755555656545352505050
Window papers (baseline)17,17224,44425,44726,72922,27623,15123,47023,73624,79226,73527,75729,26830,11232,03834,05036,18237,06538,25038,75138,83838,40738,04638,34537,53537,03037,438
Median OJR0.700.780.981.0591.021.161.171.311.361.221.271.261.0921.111.0601.191.0621.0931.051.030.960.840.820.830.810.79

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.