OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2001

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2001

Public Administration journal rankings 2001

39 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences

Public Administration has 39 ranked journals in 2001. The median OJR fell 0.21 on 2000 to 1.03, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.75. The top three are European Journal of Industrial Relations, British Journal of Industrial Relations, and Public Administration.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2001. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 score is computed on.

39
3% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.03-0.21 vs 2000
This subfieldAll 0.68World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

0%
All fields: 12%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,650
Median positive listed APC: $3,650 among 18 journals. 21 have no known price. All fields: $3,560.

Subfields of Social Sciences (22)

Show all 22 subfields

39 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Public Administration ranking, 2001

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2000. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 1998–2000 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2001.

Compare
1European Journal of Industrial RelationsSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
7.23Q14.74 2.64 up from 20004637%$3,650
3.29Q11.63 0.22 down from 2000848%$3,860
3Public AdministrationWiley · United Kingdom
3.26Q10.80 0.61 down from 20001399%$3,950
4Public Administration ReviewWiley · United States
3.17Q11.25 0.32 down from 200020013%$4,250
5Journal of Public Administration Research and TheoryOxford University Press · United Kingdom
2.07Q11.20 0.13 up from 20009257%$4,029
2.00Q10.83 0.20 up from 2000617%$2,900
1.95Q10.90 0.31 up from 20001152%$3,470
8Social WorkOxford University Press · United States
1.78Q10.83 0.12 down from 20002285%—
9Industrial Relations JournalWiley · United Kingdom
1.77Q10.66 0.29 down from 20008417%$2,900
10Public Money & ManagementTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.75Q10.63 0.08 down from 20008410%—
11Social Work ResearchOxford University Press · United States
1.69Q21.32 0.26 up from 2000420%—
12Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial ManagementEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
1.61Q20.88 0.86 up from 200068——
13Administration & SocietySAGE Publishing · United States
1.54Q20.89 0.21 up from 2000997%$3,650
14The American Review of Public AdministrationSAGE Publishing · United States
1.52Q20.72 0.07 up from 20006111%$3,900
15The British Journal of Social WorkOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.49Q20.97 0.10 up from 20001406%$4,492
16Economic and Industrial DemocracySAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.38Q20.52 0.48 down from 2000843%$3,650
17Journal of Social Work EducationTaylor & Francis · United States
1.37Q20.82 0.20 down from 20001270%—
18Public Policy and AdministrationSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.25Q20.46 0.29 down from 2000813%$3,650
19International Review of Administrative SciencesSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.13Q20.42no change1292%$3,650
20International Public Management JournalTaylor & Francis · United States
1.03Q20.59 0.19 up from 2000470%—
21International Journal of Public Sector ManagementEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
1.00Q30.53 0.27 down from 20001163%—
22Public Management ReviewTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.93Q30.42 0.31 down from 2000894%—
23Labor Studies JournalSAGE Publishing · United States
0.90Q30.41 0.27 down from 2000601%$3,400
24Journal of Industrial RelationsSAGE Publishing · Australia
0.75Q30.50 0.13 up from 2000986%$3,650
25Canadian Public AdministrationWiley · United Kingdom
0.74Q30.23 0.09 down from 2000803%$2,900
26European Journal of Social WorkTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.64Q30.15 0.06 down from 20001035%—
27International Social WorkSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.61Q30.33 0.06 up from 2000930%$3,650
28Administration in Social WorkHaworth Press · United States
0.56Q30.30 0.63 down from 2000664%—
29Journal of Social Work PracticeTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.54Q30.34 0.04 up from 2000570%—
30Smith College Studies in Social WorkTaylor & Francis · United States
0.51Q30.31 0.08 up from 2000660%—
31Social Work With GroupsTaylor & Francis · United States
0.37Q40.26 0.01 up from 2000510%—
32Journal of Teaching in Social WorkTaylor & Francis · United States
0.35Q40.18 0.01 up from 2000760%—
33The Journal of Sociology & Social WelfareWestern Michigan University · United States
0.34Q40.21 0.10 up from 200029377%—
34Australian Social WorkTaylor & Francis · Australia
0.31Q40.42 0.06 up from 20001139%—
35Social Work EducationTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.30Q40.22 0.12 down from 20001211%—
36PracticeTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.29Q40.27 0.15 up from 2000690%—
0.23Q40.14 0.07 up from 2000680%—
0.07Q40.02no change820%—
39Comparative labor law & policy journalCambridge University Press · United States
0.05Q40.02 0.06 down from 2000520%—

Citations made in 2001. Corpus-wide, 67.0% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

8 additional Public Administration journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1998–2000, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2001. Publication window: 1998–2000. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
39
Window papers (baseline)
5,454 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Median OJR
1.03 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Rising journals (2025)
6

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1998–2000 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals3939444646464546484848484849505151515051515252525149
Window papers (baseline)5,2915,4545,7376,0966,3096,4597,0697,5508,0598,1528,3908,5388,6879,0649,2839,7219,88610,2579,8669,6309,3569,5199,5979,3489,0658,961
Median OJR1.231.030.940.790.800.871.040.931.201.071.33171.511.411.211.2391.481.33241.2431.1921.461.361.341.221.181.1891.37

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.