OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2001

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2001

Anthropology journal rankings 2001

27 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences

Anthropology has 27 ranked journals in 2001. The median OJR fell 0.52 on 2000 to 0.80, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.88. The top three are Journal of Human Evolution, World Archaeology, and Current Anthropology.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2001. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 score is computed on.

27
2% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.80-0.52 vs 2000
This subfieldAll 0.68World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

0%
All fields: 12%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,400
Median positive listed APC: $3,400 among 12 journals. 15 have no known price. All fields: $3,560.

Subfields of Social Sciences (22)

Show all 22 subfields

27 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Anthropology ranking, 2001

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2000. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 1998–2000 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2001.

Compare
1Journal of Human EvolutionElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.47Q13.02 0.66 up from 20002333%$3,990
2World ArchaeologyRoutledge · United Kingdom
3.26Q11.49 0.76 up from 20001072%—
3Current AnthropologyUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
3.25Q11.32 0.04 down from 20002671%—
4Journal of Archaeological Method and TheorySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
3.21Q11.73 0.26 up from 2000310%$3,190
5American EthnologistWiley · United States
2.44Q10.65 0.01 down from 20005953%$3,400
2.03Q11.37 0.25 down from 200014614%$5,000
7American AnthropologistWiley · United States
1.88Q10.57 0.10 down from 20008342%$3,400
8African Archaeological ReviewSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
1.84Q20.58 0.09 down from 2000340%$3,390
1.68Q20.55 0.24 up from 200025168%—
10The Journal of African HistoryCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
1.02Q20.36no change641%$3,550
11Historical ArchaeologySpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.90Q20.34 0.45 down from 20001200%$2,190
12International Journal of Historical ArchaeologySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.90Q20.25 0.04 down from 2000430%$3,290
13BritanniaCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.87Q20.29 0.10 up from 20001445%$3,550
14Annual Review of AnthropologyAnnual Reviews · United States
0.80Q22.09 0.49 up from 2000720%—
15KIVATaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.67Q30.55 0.29 up from 2000700%—
16Journal of Anthropological ResearchUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
0.66Q30.28 0.16 down from 20001100%—
17PaléoFrance
0.58Q30.30 0.27 up from 20007694%—
18Journal of world historyWorld History Association · United States
0.55Q30.18 0.22 down from 20001430%—
19Azania Archaeological Research in AfricaRoutledge · United Kingdom
0.47Q30.10 0.14 down from 20003911%—
20L AnthropologieElsevier BV · France
0.41Q30.11 0.11 up from 2000644%$3,000
21Plains AnthropologistTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.38Q30.06 0.16 down from 20001470%—
22Journal of African Cultural StudiesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.22Q40.03 0.05 down from 20004123%—
23Lithic TechnologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.20Q40.03 0.41 down from 2000440%—
24Human EvolutionSpringer Nature · Italy
0.18Q40.05 0.19 down from 2000650%—
25Archaeological DialoguesCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.17Q40.04 0.29 down from 2000710%$3,550
26Wicazo Sa ReviewUniversity of Minnesota Press · United States
0.16Q40.06 0.06 down from 2000760%—
27Acta Anthropologica SinicaPublisher not listed
0.07Q40.07 0.07 up from 2000330%—

Citations made in 2001. Corpus-wide, 67.0% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

9 additional Anthropology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1998–2000, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2001. Publication window: 1998–2000. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
27
Window papers (baseline)
23,854 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Median OJR
0.80 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Rising journals (2025)
2

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1998–2000 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2427262930292930333534343637363740413837373837383637
Window papers (baseline)22,73123,85424,88925,80526,82227,93929,18930,66732,41034,30836,95038,91540,59141,37642,78244,29547,37949,73451,04550,92550,83051,20350,65148,99447,12447,101
Median OJR1.320.800.9350.920.94301.09130.94261.1820.841.041.131.291.1231.09111.1781.161.351.051.241.111.0901.1211.0331.0891.0051.031

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.