OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2017

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2017

Anthropology journal rankings 2017

41 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences

Anthropology has 41 ranked journals in 2017. The median OJR fell 0.31 on 2016 to 1.05, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 2.24. The top three are American Ethnologist, Current Anthropology, and Journal of Human Evolution.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2017. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2014–2016, the window the 2017 score is computed on.

41
1% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.05-0.31 vs 2016
This subfieldAll 0.84World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

12%
All fields: 32%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,395
Median positive listed APC: $3,395 among 16 journals. 25 have no known price. All fields: $3,350.

Subfields of Social Sciences (22)

Show all 22 subfields

41 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Anthropology ranking, 2017

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2016. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2014–2016, the window the 2017 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2014–2016 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2008 to 2017.

Compare
1American EthnologistWiley · United States
7.84Q13.96 0.78 up from 20161447%$3,400
2Current AnthropologyUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
3.88Q12.58 0.17 up from 201627624%—
3Journal of Human EvolutionElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.85Q14.14 0.08 down from 201641358%$3,990
4Journal of Archaeological Method and TheorySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
3.76Q13.42 0.34 up from 201610230%$3,190
5Journal of Social ArchaeologySAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
3.70Q12.17 0.14 up from 20165327%$3,650
6Journal of African Cultural StudiesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
3.43Q11.25 0.48 up from 20169927%—
7African Archaeological ReviewSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
3.02Q11.90 0.13 down from 20168724%$3,390
8World ArchaeologyRoutledge · United Kingdom
2.97Q12.13 0.30 down from 201615629%—
9Social AnalysisOABerghahn Books · United States
2.93Q11.13 0.19 up from 20168514%—
10Azania Archaeological Research in AfricaRoutledge · United Kingdom
2.63Q10.98 0.29 down from 201613717%—
2.24Q13.64 1.46 up from 20161156%$5,000
12PaleoAmericaTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.96Q21.97 0.08 up from 2016763%—
13The Journal of African HistoryCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
1.80Q20.60 0.20 down from 20168813%$3,550
14Archaeological DialoguesCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
1.76Q21.24 0.37 up from 20167335%$3,550
15Lithic TechnologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.63Q21.13 0.51 down from 2016666%—
16Journal of Anthropological ResearchUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
1.51Q20.89 0.16 up from 2016646%—
17Post-Medieval ArchaeologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.48Q20.46 0.90 down from 20167915%—
18American AnthropologistWiley · United States
1.39Q20.78no change54114%$3,400
19International Journal of Historical ArchaeologySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.39Q20.76 0.36 down from 201613332%$3,290
20Annual Review of AnthropologyAnnual Reviews · United States
1.20Q24.89 1.20 up from 20169854%—
21L AnthropologieElsevier BV · France
1.05Q20.48 0.25 down from 20169710%$3,000
0.98Q30.48 0.01 up from 20161656%—
0.95Q30.79 0.14 down from 20165429%$3,090
24Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and HeritageTaylor & Francis · United States
0.90Q30.36 0.42 down from 2016337%—
25ArchaeologiesSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.90Q30.62 0.05 down from 20164717%$3,290
26General AnthropologyWiley · United States
0.76Q30.14 0.41 down from 2016317%$3,090
27PaléoFrance
0.73Q30.30 0.25 down from 201673100%—
28KIVATaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.62Q30.59 0.32 up from 20167511%—
29Journal of Lithic StudiesOAUniversity of Edinburgh · United Kingdom
0.61Q30.41 0.28 down from 2016144100%—
30AfriquesOAInstitut des Mondes Africains · France
0.57Q30.05 0.13 down from 201636100%—
31Journal of world historyWorld History Association · United States
0.52Q30.16 0.03 up from 20161955%—
32Historical ArchaeologySpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.46Q40.35 0.09 up from 20161174%$2,190
33Acta Anthropologica SinicaPublisher not listed
0.44Q40.15 0.09 down from 201635——
34Rock Art ResearchOAAustralia
0.38Q40.17 0.67 down from 201640100%—
35Wicazo Sa ReviewUniversity of Minnesota Press · United States
0.35Q40.30 0.18 up from 2016780%—
36Plains AnthropologistTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.33Q40.21 0.10 down from 2016759%—
37BritanniaCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.24Q40.41 0.10 up from 20168115%$3,550
0.22Q40.15 0.03 down from 20162650%—
39eTropic electronic journal of studies in the tropicsOAJames Cook University · Australia
0.20Q40.06 0.07 down from 201695100%—
40Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales (English edition)Cambridge University Press · France
0.16Q40.08 0.11 down from 20167851%—
0.01Q40.01no change3,404——

Citations made in 2017. Corpus-wide, 77.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

9 additional Anthropology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2014–2016, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2017. Publication window: 2014–2016. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
41
Window papers (baseline)
49,734 +16.2% from indicator year 2014
Median OJR
1.05 -11.0% from indicator year 2014
Rising journals (2025)
2

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2014–2016 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2427262930292930333534343637363740413837373837383637
Window papers (baseline)22,73123,85424,88925,80526,82227,93929,18930,66732,41034,30836,95038,91540,59141,37642,78244,29547,37949,73451,04550,92550,83051,20350,65148,99447,12447,101
Median OJR1.320.800.9350.920.94301.09130.94261.1820.841.041.131.291.1231.09111.1781.161.351.051.241.111.0901.1211.0331.0891.0051.031

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.