OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2000

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2000

Anthropology journal rankings 2000

24 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences

Anthropology has 24 ranked journals in 2000. Its median journal scores above the world average: OJR 1.32 against 1.00. A journal needs OJR 1.92 to reach Q1. The top three are Journal of Human Evolution, Current Anthropology, and Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2000. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1997–1999, the window the 2000 score is computed on.

24
2% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.32
This subfieldAll 0.66World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

0%
All fields: 12%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,400
Median positive listed APC: $3,400 among 12 journals. 12 have no known price. All fields: $3,570.

Subfields of Social Sciences (22)

Show all 22 subfields

24 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Anthropology ranking, 2000

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 1999. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1997–1999, the window the 2000 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 1997–1999 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2000.

Compare
1Journal of Human EvolutionElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.78Q12.36no 1999 value2149%$3,990—
2Current AnthropologyUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
2.92Q11.36no 1999 value2642%——
3Journal of Archaeological Method and TheorySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.49Q11.47no 1999 value310%$3,190—
4Historical ArchaeologySpringer Science+Business Media · United States
2.43Q10.79no 1999 value1126%$2,190—
5American EthnologistWiley · United States
2.28Q10.66no 1999 value5902%$3,400—
6The Journal of African HistoryCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
1.92Q10.36no 1999 value611%$3,550—
1.71Q21.63no 1999 value11710%$5,000—
8American AnthropologistWiley · United States
1.69Q20.68no 1999 value8531%$3,400—
9World ArchaeologyRoutledge · United Kingdom
1.55Q20.72no 1999 value864%——
1.44Q20.19no 1999 value48—$3,090—
11African Archaeological ReviewSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
1.43Q20.67no 1999 value420%$3,390—
12International Journal of Historical ArchaeologySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.33Q20.29no 1999 value460%$3,290—
13Lithic TechnologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.31Q30.45no 1999 value440%——
14Journal of world historyWorld History Association · United States
1.14Q30.40no 1999 value1200%——
1.14Q30.31no 1999 value23344%——
16Journal of Anthropological ResearchUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
0.97Q30.44no 1999 value1020%——
17Annual Review of AnthropologyAnnual Reviews · United States
0.64Q31.60no 1999 value7713%——
18Plains AnthropologistTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.53Q30.22no 1999 value1332%——
19BritanniaCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.49Q40.20no 1999 value1558%$3,550—
20Archaeological DialoguesCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.43Q40.33no 1999 value7410%$3,550—
21PaléoFrance
0.25Q40.03no 1999 value775%——
22Human EvolutionSpringer Nature · Italy
0.23Q40.24no 1999 value805%——
23KIVATaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.19Q40.26no 1999 value630%——
24Wicazo Sa ReviewUniversity of Minnesota Press · United States
0.11Q40.12no 1999 value840%——

Citations made in 2000. Corpus-wide, 66.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

11 additional Anthropology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1997–1999, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2000. Publication window: 1997–1999. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
24
Window papers (baseline)
22,731 Change unavailable from indicator year 1997
Median OJR
1.32 Change unavailable from indicator year 1997
Rising journals (2025)
2

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1997–1999 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2427262930292930333534343637363740413837373837383637
Window papers (baseline)22,73123,85424,88925,80526,82227,93929,18930,66732,41034,30836,95038,91540,59141,37642,78244,29547,37949,73451,04550,92550,83051,20350,65148,99447,12447,101
Median OJR1.320.800.9350.920.94301.09130.94261.1820.841.041.131.291.1231.09111.1781.161.351.051.241.111.0901.1211.0331.0891.0051.031

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.