OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2021

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2021

Anthropology journal rankings 2021

38 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences

Anthropology has 38 ranked journals in 2021. Its median journal scores above the world average: OJR 1.12 against 1.00, up 0.03 on 2020. A journal needs OJR 1.90 to reach Q1. The top three are Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, Current Anthropology, and Journal of Human Evolution.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2021. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2018–2020, the window the 2021 score is computed on.

38
1% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.12+0.03 vs 2020
This subfieldAll 0.79World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

8%
All fields: 36%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,340
Median positive listed APC: $3,340 among 18 journals. 20 have no known price. All fields: $3,290.

Subfields of Social Sciences (22)

Show all 22 subfields

38 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Anthropology ranking, 2021

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2020. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2018–2020, the window the 2021 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2018–2020 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2012 to 2021.

Compare
1Journal of Paleolithic ArchaeologySpringer Science+Business Media · Switzerland
4.71Q13.27 0.15 down from 20206647%$3,190
2Current AnthropologyUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
3.02Q14.06 0.86 down from 202023123%—
3Journal of Human EvolutionElsevier BV · United Kingdom
2.62Q13.80 1.29 down from 202036049%$3,990
4Journal of Social ArchaeologySAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
2.48Q11.94 0.81 down from 20205150%$3,650
5Journal of Archaeological Method and TheorySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.45Q13.27 0.83 down from 202011359%$3,190
6PaleoAmericaTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.03Q12.34 0.75 up from 20209712%—
7Azania Archaeological Research in AfricaRoutledge · United Kingdom
1.99Q11.26 0.20 down from 202012326%—
8World ArchaeologyRoutledge · United Kingdom
1.97Q11.97 0.71 down from 202013447%—
9ArchaeologiesSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.91Q10.92 0.92 down from 20207132%$3,290
10Archaeological DialoguesCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
1.90Q12.73 1.70 up from 20206248%$3,550
1.85Q23.09 1.42 down from 202012334%$5,000
12American EthnologistWiley · United States
1.84Q21.58 0.70 down from 202011829%$3,400
13Social AnalysisOABerghahn Books · United States
1.76Q20.93 0.23 up from 2020109100%—
14American AnthropologistWiley · United States
1.72Q22.41 0.94 up from 202038214%$3,400
1.38Q20.84 0.12 down from 2020356%$3,090
1.35Q21.18 0.10 down from 202018913%—
17International Journal of Historical ArchaeologySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.33Q21.22 0.39 up from 202012133%$3,290
18Journal of African Cultural StudiesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.32Q21.22 0.54 up from 20209717%—
19African Archaeological ReviewSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
1.25Q21.07 0.62 down from 202013041%$3,390
20Lithic TechnologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.99Q31.48 0.52 up from 20207127%—
21Annual Review of AnthropologyAnnual Reviews · United States
0.95Q36.39 1.78 up from 20208641%—
22Historical ArchaeologySpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.94Q30.58 0.08 down from 202018525%$2,190
23Asian ArchaeologySpringer Science+Business Media · Singapore
0.84Q30.86 0.26 down from 2020370%$3,190
24L AnthropologieElsevier BV · France
0.82Q30.87 0.29 up from 202010520%$3,000
25Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and HeritageTaylor & Francis · United States
0.79Q30.25 0.68 down from 20204510%—
26Journal of Anthropological ResearchUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
0.76Q30.64 0.62 down from 2020614%—
27Journal of Lithic StudiesOAUniversity of Edinburgh · United Kingdom
0.72Q30.93 0.23 up from 202054100%—
28The Journal of African HistoryCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.54Q30.69 0.21 up from 20208030%$3,550
29Plains AnthropologistTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.47Q30.56 0.24 up from 20206511%—
30PaléoFrance
0.40Q40.54 0.02 down from 202052100%—
31Post-Medieval ArchaeologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.36Q40.34 0.04 up from 20207726%—
32Journal of world historyWorld History Association · United States
0.36Q40.25 0.23 down from 202019511%—
33eTropic electronic journal of studies in the tropicsOAJames Cook University · Australia
0.25Q40.64 0.19 up from 202065100%—
34KIVATaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.21Q40.26 0.06 down from 2020950%—
35BritanniaCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.19Q40.37 0.03 down from 20209820%$3,550
36General AnthropologyWiley · United States
0.08Q40.08 0.13 down from 20203518%$3,090
37Wicazo Sa ReviewUniversity of Minnesota Press · United States
0.07Q40.04no change384%—
38Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales (English edition)Cambridge University Press · France
0.00Q40.00 0.05 down from 2020550%—

Citations made in 2021. Corpus-wide, 87.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

11 additional Anthropology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2018–2020, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2021. Publication window: 2018–2020. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
38
Window papers (baseline)
51,203 +0.3% from indicator year 2018
Median OJR
1.121 -9.4% from indicator year 2018
Rising journals (2025)
2

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2018–2020 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2427262930292930333534343637363740413837373837383637
Window papers (baseline)22,73123,85424,88925,80526,82227,93929,18930,66732,41034,30836,95038,91540,59141,37642,78244,29547,37949,73451,04550,92550,83051,20350,65148,99447,12447,101
Median OJR1.320.800.9350.920.94301.09130.94261.1820.841.041.131.291.1231.09111.1781.161.351.051.241.111.0901.1211.0331.0891.0051.031

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.