Journal rankings · indicator year 2002
Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.
Subfield ranking · 2002
Aquatic Science journal rankings 2002
15 ranked journals · Subfield in Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Aquatic Science has 15 ranked journals in 2002. The median journal has an OJR of 0.32, below the world average of 1.00, up 0.02 on 2001; Q1 starts at OJR 0.74. The top three are Aquaculture Nutrition, Aquaculture, and Aquaculture Research.
Ranks and citation indicators: 2002. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.
Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1999–2001, the window the 2002 score is computed on.
The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.
The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.
The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.
Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.
Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.
Subfields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences (11)
15 ranked journals
Filters
Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest. | OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields. The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list. | Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field. ▲ or ▼ is the change from 2001. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. | Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1999–2001, the window the 2002 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked. | Share of the journal’s 1999–2001 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal. | List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed. | The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2002. | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1Aquaculture NutritionOAWiley · United Kingdom | 1.58Q1 | 1.03 0.01 down from 2001 | 105 | 54% | $2,350 | ||
2AquacultureElsevier BV · Netherlands | 1.18Q1 | 1.72 0.28 down from 2001 | 958 | 7% | $3,910 | ||
3Aquaculture ResearchOAWiley · United Kingdom | 0.78Q1 | 0.93 0.05 down from 2001 | 411 | 51% | $2,700 | ||
4Journal of the World Aquaculture SocietyOAWiley · United States | 0.74Q1 | 0.79 0.28 down from 2001 | 204 | 6% | $2,430 | ||
5Fish Physiology and BiochemistrySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 0.71Q2 | 1.13 0.21 up from 2001 | 224 | 2% | $2,590 | ||
6North American Journal of AquacultureWiley · United States | 0.48Q2 | 0.56 0.03 up from 2001 | 163 | 4% | $3,500 | ||
7Journal of Applied AquacultureTaylor & Francis · United States | 0.45Q2 | 0.38 0.09 up from 2001 | 91 | 4% | — | ||
8Fisheries ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · Japan | 0.32Q2 | 0.70 0.09 up from 2001 | 638 | 88% | $2,490 | ||
9Aquaculture InternationalSpringer Science+Business Media · Switzerland | 0.32Q3 | 0.24 0.32 down from 2001 | 139 | 2% | $3,990 | ||
10Journal of Applied IchthyologyWiley · Germany | 0.31Q3 | 0.53 0.15 up from 2001 | 313 | 55% | $2,430 | ||
11Acta Ichthyologica Et PiscatoriaOASzczecin Scientific Society · Poland | 0.12Q3 | 0.25 0.03 up from 2001 | 67 | 100% | $593 | ||
12Acta Hydrobiologica SinicaScience Press · China | 0.04Q3 | 0.04 0.03 down from 2001 | 370 | 55% | — | ||
13Asian Fisheries ScienceOAAsian Fisheries Society | 0.04Q4 | 0.09 0.04 up from 2001 | 143 | 100% | — | ||
14JOURNAL OF FISHERIES OF CHINAOAShanghai Ocean University · China | 0.03Q4 | 0.04 0.04 up from 2001 | 250 | 0% | — | ||
15Indian Journal of FisheriesOAIndian Council of Agricultural Research · India | 0.03Q4 | 0.01 0.06 down from 2001 | 148 | 100% | — |
Subfields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with Aquatic Science highlighted.
- Plant Science265
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics105
- Food Science63
- Insect Science40
- Animal Science and Zoology36
- Soil Science27
- Agronomy and Crop Science25
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences17
- Aquatic Science15
- Forestry2
- Horticulture0
Journals
Citations made in 2002. Corpus-wide, 69.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.
11 additional Aquatic Science journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1999–2001, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.
At a glance
Indicator year: 2002. Publication window: 1999–2001. How these summaries are calculated
- Ranked journals
- 15
- Window papers (baseline)
- 7,348 Change unavailable from indicator year 1999
- Median OJR
- 0.325 Change unavailable from indicator year 1999
- Rising journals (2025)
- 8
Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1999–2001 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.
| Measure | Year series | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked journals | 16 | 16 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 19 | 21 | 23 | 22 | 24 | 24 | 28 | 31 | 31 | 37 | 36 | 39 | 38 | 44 | 43 | 39 | 37 | 34 | 36 | 34 | 35 | |
| Window papers (baseline) | 5,770 | 7,046 | 7,348 | 7,851 | 7,261 | 7,613 | 8,005 | 8,802 | 9,834 | 10,881 | 12,147 | 13,298 | 14,655 | 16,032 | 17,677 | 19,465 | 21,267 | 22,952 | 25,182 | 25,805 | 26,298 | 27,183 | 29,405 | 31,084 | 31,921 | 33,289 | |
| Median OJR | 0.34 | 0.306 | 0.325 | 0.4143 | 0.310 | 0.28 | 0.319 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.57 | 0.4092 | 0.58 | 0.4094 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.467 | 0.408 | 0.40 | 0.4136 | 0.45 | 0.461 | 0.42 | 0.468 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.462 |
How to read these rankings
- OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
- A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
- Quartiles
- Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
- Impact factor (2-year)
- Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
- Rank ranges
- Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.