OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2006

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2006

Aquatic Science journal rankings 2006

21 ranked journals · Subfield in Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Aquatic Science has 21 ranked journals in 2006. The median journal has an OJR of 0.32, below the world average of 1.00, up 0.04 on 2005; Q1 starts at OJR 0.70. The top three are Aquaculture Nutrition, Aquaculture, and Marine Drugs.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2006. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2003–2005, the window the 2006 score is computed on.

21
3% of Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.32+0.04 vs 2005
This subfieldAll 0.84World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

48%
All fields: 15%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$2,590
Median positive listed APC: $2,590 among 11 journals. 10 have no known price. All fields: $3,550.

Subfields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences (11)

21 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Aquatic Science ranking, 2006

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2005. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2003–2005, the window the 2006 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2003–2005 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2006.

Compare
1Aquaculture NutritionOAWiley · United Kingdom
2.34Q12.07 0.02 up from 200514660%$2,350
2AquacultureElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.02Q11.94 0.02 up from 20051,7196%$3,910
3Marine DrugsOAMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute · Switzerland
1.00Q11.90 0.40 up from 200540100%$3,499
4Aquaculture ResearchOAWiley · United Kingdom
0.89Q11.39 0.31 up from 200559962%$2,700
5Aquaculture InternationalSpringer Science+Business Media · Switzerland
0.71Q10.78 0.20 down from 200517019%$3,990
0.70Q10.98 0.10 up from 200515510%$2,430
7Fisheries ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · Japan
0.54Q20.97 0.06 up from 20055262%$2,490
0.53Q20.93 0.17 up from 200526054%$2,430
9Journal of Applied AquacultureTaylor & Francis · United States
0.42Q20.41 0.08 down from 20051250%—
0.35Q20.63 0.15 down from 20051750%$3,500
11Fish Physiology and BiochemistrySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.32Q20.45 0.24 down from 20053006%$2,590
12Avances en Nutrición AcuicolaPublisher not listed
0.15Q30.31 0.22 up from 2005320%—
0.14Q30.23 0.15 up from 2005131100%—
14Acta Ichthyologica Et PiscatoriaOASzczecin Scientific Society · Poland
0.12Q30.29 0.09 up from 200554100%$593
15Asian Fisheries ScienceOAAsian Fisheries Society
0.10Q30.14 0.13 down from 200510891%—
16Fisheries and aquatic sciencesThe Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science · South Korea
0.08Q30.20 0.13 up from 200510664%—
17Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesOACentral Fisheries Research Institute of Türkiye · Türkiye
0.08Q40.13 0.07 up from 2005450%—
18Acta Hydrobiologica SinicaScience Press · China
0.05Q40.07 0.03 up from 200552366%—
19Indian Journal of FisheriesOAIndian Council of Agricultural Research · India
0.05Q40.02 0.02 down from 2005175100%—
20JOURNAL OF FISHERIES OF CHINAOAShanghai Ocean University · China
0.04Q40.06 0.01 up from 20053220%—
0.00Q40.00no 2005 value710%——

Citations made in 2006. Corpus-wide, 71.3% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

13 additional Aquatic Science journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2003–2005, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2006. Publication window: 2003–2005. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
21
Window papers (baseline)
8,005 +2.0% from indicator year 2003
Median OJR
0.319 -23.1% from indicator year 2003
Rising journals (2025)
8

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2003–2005 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1616151717192123222424283131373639384443393734363435
Window papers (baseline)5,7707,0467,3487,8517,2617,6138,0058,8029,83410,88112,14713,29814,65516,03217,67719,46521,26722,95225,18225,80526,29827,18329,40531,08431,92133,289
Median OJR0.340.3060.3250.41430.3100.280.3190.300.360.570.40920.580.40940.560.500.4670.4080.400.41360.450.4610.420.4680.530.520.462

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.