OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2003

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2003

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty journal rankings 2003

22 ranked journals · Subfield in Decision Sciences

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty has 22 ranked journals in 2003. The median OJR fell 0.17 on 2002 to 0.45, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.21. The top three are Structural Safety, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, and Reliability Engineering & System Safety.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2003. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2000–2002, the window the 2003 score is computed on.

22
25% of Decision Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.45-0.17 vs 2002
This subfieldAll 0.75World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

0%
All fields: 13%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,470
Median positive listed APC: $3,470 among 13 journals. 9 have no known price. All fields: $3,550.

Subfields of Decision Sciences (4)

22 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty ranking, 2003

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2002. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2000–2002, the window the 2003 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2000–2002 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2003.

Compare
1Structural SafetyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.93Q11.25 0.33 up from 2002896%$4,430
2Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyElsevier BV · United States
1.76Q12.63 0.32 up from 20025486%$4,210
3Reliability Engineering & System SafetyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.67Q11.37 0.44 up from 20023651%$4,830
4Journal of Quality TechnologyTaylor & Francis · United States
1.66Q11.51 0.39 up from 20022052%—
5ScientometricsSpringer Nature (Netherlands) · Hungary
1.34Q11.40 0.54 up from 20022968%$3,190
6Probabilistic Engineering MechanicsElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.21Q10.86 0.20 down from 20021143%$3,370
7Learned PublishingWiley · United Kingdom
1.18Q20.55 0.17 up from 200214454%$2,080
8Research EvaluationOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.16Q20.61 0.20 up from 20025218%$3,470
0.82Q20.85 0.37 up from 20021818%$4,550
10MetrologiaIOP Publishing
0.81Q20.62 0.13 up from 200246033%$3,325
11Quality EngineeringTaylor & Francis · United States
0.46Q20.29 0.01 down from 200222817%—
12Process Safety ProgressWiley · United States
0.44Q30.26 0.03 down from 20021259%$3,570
13Safety and ReliabilityTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.34Q30.18 0.04 up from 2002470%—
14Accreditation and Quality AssuranceSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.32Q30.32 0.20 up from 20023412%$3,890
15Science & Technology LibrariesTaylor & Francis · United States
0.30Q30.13 0.09 down from 20021464%—
16Sequential AnalysisTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.28Q30.26 0.05 up from 2002470%—
17Journal of Scholarly PublishingUniversity of Toronto Press · Canada
0.19Q30.15no change440%—
18Quality AssuranceTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.17Q40.00 0.15 down from 2002580%—
19Economic Quality ControlDe Gruyter · Germany
0.16Q40.18 0.12 down from 2002340%—
20Publishing Research QuarterlySpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.08Q40.04 0.03 down from 2002793%$3,290
0.07Q40.07 0.03 down from 20021904%$3,300
0.04Q40.08 0.17 down from 20026250%—

Citations made in 2003. Corpus-wide, 70.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

3 additional Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2000–2002, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2003. Publication window: 2000–2002. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
22
Window papers (baseline)
8,530 +11.4% from indicator year 2000
Median OJR
0.45 -28.0% from indicator year 2000
Rising journals (2025)
1

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2000–2002 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1718192221212221222426272830333540404142414243424243
Window papers (baseline)7,6557,8818,2618,5308,8999,38510,13611,11812,00013,29514,46515,54416,41617,45818,88719,79220,29020,36620,77621,44122,51123,11923,51723,02022,64622,974
Median OJR0.630.690.620.450.480.550.760.8501.150.920.8420.8480.960.8401.010.870.860.7490.8460.880.950.8540.790.7470.740.90

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.